References
- Angelo, T. A., and K. P. Cross. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Archer, C. C., and M. K. Miller. 2011. “Prioritizing Active Learning: An Exploration of Gateway Courses in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (02):429–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000291.
- Bonwell, C., and J. Eison. 1991. Active Learning Creating Excitement. ERIC Clearing House on Higher Education. Washington, DC: George Washington University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED340272.pdf
- Burch, K. 2000. “A Primer on Problem-Based Learning for International Relations Courses.” International Studies Perspectives 1 (1):31–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.00003.
- Chase, B., R. Germundsen, J. C. Brownstein, and L. S. Distad. 2001. “Making the Connection Between Increased Student Learning and Reflective Practice.” Educational Horizons 79 (3):143–147.
- Chin, J., R. Dukes, and W. Gamson. 2009. “Assessment in Simulation and Gaming. A Review of the Last 40 Years.” Simulation and Gaming 40 (4):239–244.
- Ciliotta-Rubery, A., and D. Levy. 2000. “Congressional Committee Simulation: An Active Learning Experiment.” PS: Political Science and Politics 33 :847–852.
- Colliver, J. 2000. “Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Curricula.” Academic Medicine 75 (3):259–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200003000-00017.
- Deslauriers, L., E. Schelew, and C. Wieman. 2011. “Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class.” Science 332 (6031):862–864. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783.
- Dougherty, B. 2003. “Byzantine Politics: Using Simulations to Make Sense of the Middle East.” Political Science and Politics 36 (02):239–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503002154.
- Elias, A. 2014. “Simulating the European Union: Reflections on Module Design.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (4):407–422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12009.
- Gosen, J., and J. Washbush. 2004. “A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness.” Simulation & Gaming 35 (2):270–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878104263544.
- Hake, R. R. 1998. “Interactive-Engagement vs Traditional Methods: A Six- Thousand- Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66 (1):64–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
- Ishiyama, J. 2013. “Frequently Used Active Learning Techniques and Their Impact: A Critical Review of Existing Journal Literature in the United States.” European Political Science 12 (1):116–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2012.3.
- Jones, R., and P. Bursens. 2015. “The Effects of Active Learning Environments: How Simulations Trigger Affective Learning.” European Political Science 14 (3):254–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.22.
- Knight, J. K., and W. B. Wood. 2005. “Teaching More by Lecturing Less.” Cell Biology Education 4 (4):298–310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082.
- Lantis, J., L. M. Kuzma, and J. Boehrer. 2000. The New International Studies Classroom: Active Teaching, Active Learning. New York: Lynne Rienner.
- Loggins, J. 2009. “Simulating the Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process in the Undergraduate Classroom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (02):401–407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096509090544.
- Lowman, J. 1984. Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- McKeachie, W. J., P. R. Pintrich, Y.-G. Lin, and D. A. F. Smith. (1986). Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom: A Review of the Research Literature. Ann Arbor, MI: Regents of The University of Michigan.
- Meltzer, David E., and Kandiah Manivannan. 1996. “Promoting Interactivity in Physics Lecture Classes.” The Physics Teacher 34 (2):72–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344349.
- Meyers, C., and T. Jones. 1993. Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- National Research Council, Committee on Undergraduate Science Education 1997. Science Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council, Committee on Undergraduate Science Education 2003. Improving undergraduate instruction in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Science Foundation. 1996. Shaping the Future: New Experiences for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology. Report of the Advisory Committee to the NSF Directorate for Education and Human Resources. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
- Novak, J. D. 1990. “Concept Mapping: A Useful Tool for Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (10):937–949. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660271003.
- Novak, J. D., and D. B. Gowin. 1984. Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Ortega, R. A., and C. J. Brame. 2015. “The Synthesis Map is a Multidimensional Educational Tool That Provides Insight into Students’ Mental Models and Promotes Students’ Synthetic Knowledge Generation.”CBE—Life Sciences Education 14 (2):ar14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-07-0114.
- Prince, M. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3):223–231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
- Rowe, M. B. 1980. “Pausing Principles and Their Effect Upon Reasoning in Science.” In Teaching the Sciences, ed. F. B. Brawer. New Directions in Community Colleges, No. 31. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 7–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.36819803106.
- Ruhl, K. L., C. A. Hughes, and P. J. Schloss. 1987. “Using the Pause Procedure to Enhance Lecture Recall.” Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children 10(1):14–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/088840648701000103.
- Schaible, R., and G. Rhodes. 1992. “Metaphor in Science and Literature: Creating an Environment for Active Interdisciplinary Learning.” Journal of College Science Teaching 12 :100.
- Shellman, S.M., and K. Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):19–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160500484168.
- Sidelinger, R. J. 2010. “College Student Involvement: An Examination of Student Characteristics and Perceived Instructor Communication Behaviors in the Classroom.” Communication Studies 61 (1):87–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970903400311.
- Silberman, M. 1996. Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach any Subject. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Waitkus, J. 2006. “Active Learning in Humanities Courses: Helping Students to Think Critically.” Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC) 3(10):57–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v3i10.1671.
- Wankat, P. 2002. The Effective Efficient Professor: Teaching Scholarship and Service. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.