Quantitative Political Science Education in the Past and Future

References

• Alharthi, Majed. 2019. “Students’ Attitudes toward the Use of Technology in Online Courses.” International Journal of Technology in Education 3 (1):14–23. doi: 10.46328/ijte.v3i1.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, Z., T. Tanveer, S. Aziz, M. Usman, and A. Azam. 2022. Reassessing the Performance of ARM vs x86 with Recent Technological Shift of Apple. Paper Presented at the 2022 International Conference on IT and Industrial Technologies (ICIT), 3–4 Oct. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Elaine I., and Jeff Seaman. 2007. "Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning." In. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Kristi, and Dana Michael Harsell. 2005. “Assessing the Impact of a Quantitative Skills Course for Undergraduates.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (1):17–27. doi: 10.1080/15512160490921824.
   Google Scholar
• Ariel, Yaron, and Vered Elishar-Malka. 2019. “Learning in the Smartphone Era: Viewpoints and Perceptions on Both Sides of the Lectern.” Education and Information Technologies 24 (4):2329–2340. doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09871-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, Zachary D., Kathleen Marchetti, and Benjamin Soltoff. 2015. “What’s the Payoff?: Assessing the Efficacy of Student Response Systems.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (3):249–263. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2015.1047104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergbower, Matthew L. 2017. “When Are Students Ready for Research Methods? A Curriculum Mapping Argument for the Political Science Major.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (2):200–210. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2017.1292917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, Melissa, Katja Buntins, Svenja Bedenlier, Olaf Zawacki-Richter, and Michael Kerres. 2020. “Mapping Research in Student Engagement and Educational Technology in Higher Education: A Systematic Evidence Map.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 17 (1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, David S., Katherine V. Bryant, and Andrew Q. Philips. 2022. “Integrating the Use of Statistical Software into Undergraduate Political Methodology Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (1):210–215. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521001177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, Sean. "Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft Battle for K-12 Market, and Loyalties of Educators." Editorial Projects in Education, Accessed June 5, 2023. https://marketbrief.edweek.org/special-report/amazon-apple-google-and-microsoft-battle-for-k-12-market-and-loyalties-of-educators/.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, Monica. 2023. File Not Found: A Generation that Grew Up with Google is Forcing Professors to Rethink Their Lesson Plans." The Verge, Accessed June 5, https://www.theverge.com/22684730/students-file-folder-directory-structure-education-gen-z.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Dean. 2022. "Student device usage report: April 2022." In. Milton Keynes, England: The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, Laura, Daniel J. Mallinson, James Emery, William Illingworth, and Clare Cruz. 2022. “Engaging Engagement: A Multi-Disciplinary Study of App-Based Student Response Technology.” Journal of Excellence in College Teaching 33 (3):123–146.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, Susan. "Colleges Race to Higher and Build Amid AI 'Gold Rush’." Inside Higher Education, Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2023/05/19/colleges-race-hire-and-build-amid-ai-gold.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, Maureen, and Renée Van Vechten. 2021. “Whither the Political Science Major? Curricular Design and Program Learning Outcomes at 110 US Colleges and Universities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2):363–367. doi: 10.1017/S1049096520001882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazier, Rebecca A., Kerstin Hamann, Philip H. Pollock, and Bruce M. Wilson. 2020. “Age, Gender, and Student Success: Mixing Face-to-Face and Online Courses in Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 16 (2):142–157. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1515636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawlitschek, Anja, Sarah Berndt, and Sandra Schulz. 2023. “Empirical Research on Pair Programming in Higher Education: A Literature Review.”Computer Science Education 33(3):400–428. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2022.2039504.
   Google Scholar
• Heaven, Will Douglas. " 2023. ChatGPT is Going to Change Education, Not Destroy It." MIT Technology Review, Accessed June 5, https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/04/06/1071059/chatgpt-change-not-destroy-education-openai/.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, Ivan Dinev. 2021. “The Use of Interactive Student Response Software in an Introductory International Relations Course.”Journal of Political Science Education 17(sup1):421–439. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1694533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Jae Yeon, and Yee Man Margaret Ng. 2022. “Teaching Computational Social Science for All.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (3):605–609. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521001815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner, Anne, Elizabeth Farris, and Bernard Greene. 2002. "Internet access in U.S. Public schools and classrooms: 1994-2001." In. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kvavik, Bob, Judy Caruso, and Morgan Mogan. 2004. "ECAR study of students and information technology, 2004: Convenience, connection, and control." In. Boulder, CO: Educause.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Ruoxi. 2021. “Teaching Undergraduates R in an Introductory Research Methods Course: A Step-by-Step Approach.” Journal of Political Science Education 17 (4):653–671. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1667811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson, Daniel J., Julia Marin Hellwege, and Eric D. Loepp. 2021. "The palgrave handbook of political research pedagogy." In. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mallinson, Daniel J., and Laura Cruz. 2022. “Fostering Civic Agency in an American Government Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 18 (4):476–491. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2022.2098137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, Emma. 2019. “No Longer a Silent Partner: How Mentimeter Can Enhance Teaching and Learning within Political Science.”Journal of Political Science Education 15(4):546–551. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1538882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, Sioux, Dan Dixon, Daniel Oppenheimer, Margaret Blackie, and Sam Illingworth. " 2023. ChatGPT is the Push Higher Education Needs to Rethink Assessment." The Conversation, Accessed June 5, https://theconversation.com/chatgpt-is-the-push-higher-education-needs-to-rethink-assessment-200314.
   Google Scholar
• McMurtrie, Beth. " 2023. ChatGPT is Everywhere: Love It or Hate It, Academics Can’t Ignore the Already Pervasive Technology." The Chronicle of Higher Education, Accessed June 5, https://www.chronicle.com/article/chatgpt-is-already-upending-campus-practices-colleges-are-rushing-to-respond.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Michael S., and Lawrence S. Bacow. 2015. “Online Higher Education: Beyond the Hype Cycle.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (4):135–154. doi: 10.1257/jep.29.4.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, Beatrice. " 2023. Here are the Schools and Colleges that have Banned the Use of ChatGPT Over Plagiarism and Misinformation Fears." Business Insider, Accessed June 5, https://www.businessinsider.com/chatgpt-schools-colleges-ban-plagiarism-misinformation-education-2023-1.
   Google Scholar
• Reisdorf, Bianca C., Whisnu Triwibowo, and Aleksandr Yankelevich. 2020. “Laptop or Bust: How Lack of Technology Affects Student Achievement.” American Behavioral Scientist 64 (7):927–949. doi: 10.1177/0002764220919145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sana, Faria, Tina Weston, and Nicholas J. Cepeda. 2013. “Laptop Multitasking Hinders Classroom Learning for Both Users and Nearby Peers.” Computers & Education 62 :24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocum-Schaffer, Stephanie A., and Robert E. Bohrer. 2021. “Information Literacy for Everyone: Using Practical Strategies to Overcome ‘Fear and Loathing’ in the Undergraduate Research Methods Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 17 (sup1):363–379. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1694935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slootmaeckers, Koen, Bart Kerremans, and Johan Adriaensen. 2014. “Too Afraid to Learn: Attitudes towards Statistics as a Barrier to Learning Statistics and to Acquiring Quantitative Skills.” Politics 34 (2):191–200. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thought Leadership Team 2022. "Maximizing mobile Value - To BYOD or not to BYOD?" In. New York, NY: Oxford Economics.
   Google Scholar
• TIOBE. "TIOBE Index for June 2023: Will Python Remain Number 1?" 2023. TIOBE Programming Community, Accessed June 5, https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/.
   Google Scholar
• University of Wisconsin-Madison 2004. "SurveyL students using more portable technology." In. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Rob. 2022. “Teaching Programming Skills in Methods Courses is an Opportunity, Not a Burden.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55(1):221–224. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521001153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar