Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate: Pedagogical Innovation to Enhance Attainment, Engagement, Satisfaction and Employability in Political Science

References

• Baranowski, M. K., and K. A. Weir. 2015. “Political Simulations: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Still Need to Know.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(4):391–403. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2015.1065748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, N. H., H. V. Phu, T. Yen, N. Vinh, and H. T. Duc. 2022. “CDIO-Based Syllabus Design in the Context of Teacher Education.” Paper presented at the 18th International CDIO Conference, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, B., and V. Haufler. 2020. “What Can I Do with This Class? Building Employment-Related Skills in International Relations Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 16(1):67–78. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1515634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradberry, L., and J. De Maio. 2019. “Learning by Doing: The Long Term Impact of Experiential Learning Programs on Student Success.” Journal of Political Science Education 15(1):94–111. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1485571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, A. B. R., A. D. O. Sandoval, and G. Odamtten. 2022. “Up around the Bend? How Transport Poverty Can Lead to Social Exclusion in a Low-Income Community in Lagos, Nigeria.” Journal of Transport Geography 102:103388. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDIO.org. n.d.a. “Standards 3.0.” Accessed 20 July 2023. http://cdio.org/files/CDIO%20STANDARDS%203.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CDIO.org. n.d.b. “Member Schools.” Accessed 20 January 2023. http://www.cdio.org/cdio-collaborators/school-profiles.
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, S., L. Y. Lim, and Y. C. Chao. 2022. “CDIO for Education for Sustainable Development using common core curriculum.” Paper presented at the 18th International CDIO Conference, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. C. G., L. Liote, and C. Colomer. 2023. “We Need to Talk about Engineering Policy.” Technology in Society 72:102196. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, E., and T. Vanoutrive. 2022. “Is Accessibility Inequality Morally Irrelevant? An Exploration Using Local Residents’ Assessments in Modesto, California.” Journal of Transport Geography 99:103281. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, J. 2014. “What Have We Been Writing about? Patterns and Trends in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 10(1):23–36. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.859086.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, E. F., J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. R. Brodeur, and K. Edstrom. 2007. Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 2022. “2020 UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Final Figures.” Accessed 25 July 2023. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1051408/2020-final-greenhouse-gas-emissions-statistical-release.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dionne, K. Y. 2023. “Teaching Political Science Using Design Thinking: Insights from “Contemporary African Politics” and “Elections around the World.” Journal of Political Science Education 19(1):16–33. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2022.2104163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• En, D. A. W., R. Hoh, Y. S. Meng, G. Lim, and H. S. Hui. 2022. “Solving Real-World Problems in Accounting Industry Using CDIO Framework.” Paper presented at the 18th International CDIO Conference, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Audit Committee 2018. “Disposable Packaging Coffee Cups. Second Report of Session 2017-2019.” Accessed 20 July 2023 https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmenvaud/657/657.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J. 2020. “Integrating the “Science” and “Practice” of Politics in a Single Course: A Proof of Concept.” Journal of Political Science Education 16(3):277–299. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1574587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friere, P. 2017. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 13th ed. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Glazier, R., and M. Bowman. 2021. “Teaching through Community-Based Research: Undergraduate and Graduate Collaboration on the 2016 Little Rock Congregations Study.” Journal of Political Science Education 17(2):234–252. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1629299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, R. W., D. C. Lewis, R. Meagher, and K. A. Owens. 2021. “Advocating for Engagement: Do Experiential Learning Courses Boost Civic Engagement?” Journal of Political Science Education 17(sup1):599–615. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2020.1831932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosman, L., and G. Jacobs. 2018. “From Active Learning to Taking Action: Incorporating Political Context into Project-Based, Interdisciplinary, International Service Learning Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 14(4):473–490. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2017.1419876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imam, A., N. Joyce, and A. Nortcliffe. 2023. “Engineering learning of sustainable produce lifecycle through CDIO.” Paper presented at the 18th International CDIO Conference, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Isacoff, J. B. 2014. “Achieving What Political Science is For.” Journal of Political Science Education 10(4):414–423. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2014.947416.
   Google Scholar
• Jary, C. 2015. “Working with Ministers.” Accessed 27 January 2023. https://www.civilservant.org.uk/library/2015_Working_with_Ministers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, S. 2015. “Development and Social Policy: The Role of Transport in the UK Context.” In International Handbook on Transport and Development, eds. R. Hickman, D. Bonilla, M. Givoni, and D. Banister, 430–440. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, S. 2023. “Embedding the Social Sciences in Engineering Education: Collaboration with a Politics Degree.” In Lyng, R., Bennedsen, J., Bettaieb, L., Bodsberg, N. R., Edstrom, K., Guojonsdottir, M. S., Roslof, J., Solbjorg, O. K. and Oien, G. Eds. The 19th CDIO Conference Proceedings – full papers. Trondheim: NTNU SEED. 155–165. ISBN: 978-82-303-6186-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, S., G. Lyons, and J. Rafferty. 2002. “Transport and Social Exclusion: Investigating the Possibility of Promoting Inclusion through Virtual Mobility.” Journal of Transport Geography 10(3):207–219. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, S., R. Phillips, and B. Robinson. 2021. “Authentic Assessment: Supporting Community, Confidence, Engagement and Well-Being.” Political Studies Association Teaching and Learning Network blog post. Accessed 16 November 2023. https://www.psa.ac.uk/specialist-groups/group-news/authentic-assessmentsupporting-community-confidence-engagement-and.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, R. D. 2019. “How the Journal of Transport Geography Has Evolved since 1993.” Journal of Transport Geography 81:102525. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, S., S. Patil, and R. Pawar. 2020. “Adoption of the Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate Approach to a Third Year Project in a Team-Based Design-Build Environment.” Procedia Computer Science 172:559–567. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.068.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M., S. Perry, and A. Steinberg. 2023. “From Classroom to Community: An Assessment and Potential Implications of an Undergraduate Civic Engagement Research and Learning Program.” Journal of Political Science Education 19(2):250–269. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2022.2128811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, A. B. 2011. “A Real CDIO Mechanical Engineering Project in 4th Semester.” Paper Presented at the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. 2019. “A New Evolution for Transport-Related Social Exclusion Research?” Journal of Transport Geography 81:102529. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonagle, R. J., and R. Savitz. 2023. “Active Learning: Beyond Structured Debates in Political Science Pedagogy.” Journal of Political Science Education 19(3):355–370. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2022.2132164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., H. Huay, J. Kontio, and T. Minh. 2016. Paper presented at the 12th International CDIO Conference, University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., U. Lundqvist, A. Rosen, K. Edstrom, R. Gupta, H. Leong, S. M. Cheah, J. Bennesden, R. Hugo, A. Kamp, O. Leifler, S. Gunnarson, J. Roslof, and D. Spooner. 2022. “The CDIO Syllabus 3.0 – An Updated Statement of Goals.” Paper presented at the 18th International CDIO Conference. Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Manna, S. K., N. Joyce, and A. Nortcliffe. 2023. “Integration of Graduate Employability Skills through Industry Outsourced CDIO Project.” Paper presented at the 18th International CDIO Conference, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. A., E. Conlon, and B. Bowe. 2021. “A Multi-Level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-Technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 27(5):60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. S. 2019. “Virtual Integration in U.S. Senate Campaigns: An Active Learning Tool for Teaching American Government.” Journal of Political Science Education 15(2):206–217. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1464458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, S., and B. Tan. 2022. “Improving Teamwork with a Rotation Leadership Model.” Paper presented at the 18th International CDIO Conference, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, Juan P., Juan C. Duque, Verónica Botero-Fernández, and Mark Brussel. 2022. “Understanding the Effect of Sociodemographic, Natural and Built Environment Factors on Cycling Accessibility.” Journal of Transport Geography 102:103386. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, T. J., and C. Robichaud. 2020. “Teaching Ethics Using Simulations: Active Learning Exercises in Political Theory.” Journal of Political Science Education 16(2):225–242. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1568879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. L. 2023. “High-Impact Teaching Practices and Undergraduates’ Political Efficacy.” Journal of Political Science Education 19(1):107–118. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2022.2130071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinfret, S. R., and M. C. Pautz. 2015. “Understanding Public Policy Making through the Work of Committees: Utilizing a Student-Led Congressional Hearing Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(4):442–454. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2015.1060886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., M. Roser, and P. Rosado. 2020. “CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Accessed 25 July 2022. https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, W. 2000. “Mobility and Accessibility: The Yin and Yang of Planning.” World Transport Policy and Practice 6(2):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C., and J. Tiatia-Seath. 2022. “Travel Inequities Experienced by Pacific Peoples in Aotearoa/New Zealand.” Journal of Transport Geography 99:103305. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solop, F. I., H. N. Anderson, C. Barsky, E. Schnurr, and E. Witlacil. 2022. “Introducing Client-Focused Research (CFR) Projects into the Research Methods Curriculum: Key Considerations for Political Science Instructors.” Journal of Political Science Education 18(3):284–300. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2022.2058518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangkijviwat, U., W. Sunthorn, and N. Meeusah. 2018. Paper presented at the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Tholler, S., and J. Rian. 2020. “Education for Engineers or Re-engineering Education? CDIO in Non-Engineering Programmes.” Paper presented at the 16th International CDIO Conference, Chalmers University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• van Dülmen, Christoph, Martin Šimon, and Andreas Klärner. 2022. “Transport Poverty Meets Car Dependency: A GPS Tracking Study of Social Disadvantaged Groups in European Rural Peripheries.” Journal of Transport Geography 101:103351. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., C. Liu, and H. Zhang. 2022. “Where Are Equity and Service Effectiveness? A Tale from Public Transport in Shanghai.” Journal of Transport Geography 98:103275. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, M. K., P. Goodhew, and J. Malmqvist. 2007. “CDIO Applied in the Context of Materials Science.” Paper presented at the 3rd International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• West, L., and D. Halvorson. 2021. “Student Engagement and Deep Learning in the First-Year International Relations Classroom: Simulating a UN Security Council Debate on the Syrian Crisis.” Journal of Political Science Education 17(2):173–190. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2019.1616298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar