64
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Simulations, Role-Play, and Games

Wargames as Pedagogical Tools: Using Wargames for Higher Education

Received 17 Aug 2023, Accepted 24 Apr 2024, Published online: 10 May 2024

References

  • Anderson, L., D. Krathwohl, and B. Bloom. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Appleget, J., R. Burks, and F. Cameron. 2020. The Craft of Wargaming: A Detailed Planning Guide for Defense Planners and Analysts. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
  • Archer, C. C., and M. K. Miller. 2011. “Prioritizing Active Learning: An Exploration of Gateway Courses in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (2):429–434. doi: 10.1017/S1049096511000291.
  • Asal, V. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6 (3):359–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00213.x.
  • Asal, V., L. Griffith, and M. Schulzke. 2014. “The Dalig and Vadan Exercise: Teaching Students about Strategy and the Challenges of Friction and Fog.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (4):477–490. doi: 10.1111/insp.12056.
  • Asal, V., and J. Kratoville. 2013. “Constructing International Relations Simulations: Examining the Pedagogy of IR Simulations through a Constructivist Learning Theory Lens.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2):132–43. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.770982.
  • Asal, V., S. S. Sin, N. P. Fahrenkopf, and X. She. 2014. “The Comparative Politics Game Show: Using Games to Teach Comparative Politics Theories.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (3):347–58. doi: 10.1111/insp.12010.
  • Asal, V., N. Jahanbani, D. Lee, and J. Ren. 2018. “Mini-Games for Teaching Political Science Methodology.” Political Science & Politics 51 (4):900–902.
  • Bain, K. 2004. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bartels, E. M. 2020. Building Better Games for National Security Policy Analysis: Towards a Social Scientific Approach. California: RAND.
  • Bartels, E. M. 2023. “Wargames as an Educational Tool.” The Forge.
  • Bartles, E., M. McCown, and T. Wilkie. 2012. “Designing Peace and Conflict Exercises: Level of Analysis, Scenario, and Role Specification.” Simulation & Gaming 44 (1):36–50. doi: 10.1177/1046878112455486.
  • Bryant, S., and T. Nagle. 2021. Wargaming for the New Great Game. West Point: Modern War Institute.
  • Caffrey, M. 2019. On Wargaming: How Wargames Have Shaped History and How They May Shape the Future. Newport, RI: Naval War College Press.
  • Christopher, E. M. 1999. “Simulations and Games as Subversive Activities.” Simulation & Gaming 30 (4):441–55. doi: 10.1177/104687819903000403.
  • Clark, C. 2017. Inside the Wargame: The Challenges Facing Air Force’s MDC2. Breaking Defense.
  • Coffey, D. J., W. J. Miller, and D. Feuerstein. 2011. “Classroom as Reality: Demonstrating Campaign Effects through Live Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (1):14–33. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2011.539906.
  • Crookall, D., and W. Thorngate. 2009. “Acting, Knowing, Learning, Simulating, Gaming.” Simulation & Gaming 40 (1):8–26. doi: 10.1177/1046878108330364.
  • Davis, D. L. 2012. “Truth, Lies, and Afghanistan.” Armed Forces Journal. http://armedforcesjournal.com/truth-lies-and-afghanistan/
  • Dorn, D. S. 1989. “Simulation Games: One More Tool on the Pedagogical Shelf.” Teaching Sociology 17 (1):1–18. doi: 10.2307/1317920.
  • Doughery, C. 2020. “It’s Time to Rethink Our Wargames.” Inkstick.
  • Ducharme, D. R. 2020. Handbook for Survey Development. Newport, RI: US Naval War College.
  • Dunnigan, J. F. 1992. The Complete Wargames Handbook: How to Play, Design, and Find Them. NY: William Morrow and Company.
  • Fielder, J. D. 2018. “The Narrative History of the Chocolate Wars: A Short and Tasty Bargaining Game.” Journal of Political Science Education 15 (1):82–93. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1446343.
  • Fielder, J. D. 2022. “Gaming to Lose: Learning from Failure in Classroom Games.” In Simulations in the Political Science Classroom: Games without Frontiers, eds. M. Harvey, J. D. Fielder, and R. Gibb. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Frank, A. 2012. “Gaming the Game: A Study of Gamer Mode in Educational Wargaming.” Simulation & Gaming 43:118–32. doi: 10.1177/1046878111408796.
  • Glick, S. P., and L. I. Charters. 1983. “War, Games, and Military History.” Journal of Contemporary History 18 (4):567–582.
  • Goldblum, B. L., A. W. Reddie, and J. C. Reinhardt. 2019. “Wargames as Experiments: The Project on Nuclear Gaming’s SIGNAL Framework.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
  • Gorton, W., and J. Havercroft. 2012. “Using Historical Simulations to Teach Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 8 (1):50–68. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2012.641399.
  • Haffa, R. P., and J. H. Patton. 2001. “Wargames: Winning and Losing.” Parameters 31 (1):9.
  • Heath, T. R. 2023. “Wargames Can’t Tell Us How to Deter a Chinese Attack on Taiwan – but Different Games Might.” Lawfare.
  • Ip, A., and R. Linser. 2001. “Evaluation of a Role-Play Simulation in Political Science.” The Technology Source 2 (1). http://technologysource.org/article/evaluation_of_a_role_play_simulation_in_political_science/
  • Jensen, B. 2017. “Next War: #Wargaming the Changing Character of Competition and Conflict.” The Strategy Bridge.
  • Jensen, B., and M. Strohmeyer. 2022. “The Changing Character of Combined Arms.” War on the Rocks.
  • Juul, J. 2016. The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kanner, M. D. 2007. “War and Peace: Simulating Security Decision Making in the Classroom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (4):795–800. doi: 10.1017/S1049096507071259.
  • Keuhn, K. 2021. “Assessment Strategies for Educational Wargames.” Journal of Advanced Military Studies 12 (2):139–153.
  • Kitchen, V. 2022. “Using Games and Simulations to Scaffold Experiential Learning in Global Politics.” Journal of Political Science Education 18 (1):119–37. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2021.1987258.
  • Knight, J. K., and W. B. Wood. 2005. “Teaching More by Lecturing Less.” Cell Biology Education 4 (4):298–310. doi: 10.1187/05-06-0082.
  • Koster, K. 2014. A Theory of Fun for Game Design. 2nd ed. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
  • Lacey, J. 2016. “Wargaming in the Classroom: An Odyssey.” War on the Rocks.
  • Lean, J., J. Moizer, M. Towler, and C. Abbey. 2006. “Simulations and Games: Use and Barriers in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 7 (3):227–42. doi: 10.1177/1469787406069056.
  • Levin-Banchik, L. 2018. “Assessing Knowledge Retention, with and without Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (3):341–359. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2017.1405355.
  • Lin-Greenberg, E., R. B. C. Pauly, and J. G. Scheider. 2022. “Wargaming for International Relations Research.” European Journal of International Relations 28 (I):83–109. doi: 10.1177/13540661211064090.
  • Mattlin, M. 2020. “Anarchy is What Students Make of It: Playing out Wendt’s Three Cultures of Anarchy.” Journal of Political Science Education 17 (1):226–36. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2020.1861457.
  • Mason, R. C. 2018. “Wargaming: its History and Future.” The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs 20 (2):77–101. doi: 10.1080/23800992.2018.1484238.
  • McGrady, E. 2019. “Getting the Story Right about Wargaming.” War on the Rocks.
  • McLeary, P. 2015. “DOD Wargaming Push to Study Tech Capabilities.” Defense News.
  • Medeiros, S., and L. Campani. 2023. “Tracing the Chinese Wargaming Knowledge and Application within Strategic Thinking Frameworks.” Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval 29 (2):249–66. doi: 10.21544/2359-3075.29205.
  • Meibauer, G., and A. A. Nohr. 2018. “Teaching Experience: How to Make and Use PowerPoint-Based Interactive Simulations for Undergraduate IR Teaching.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (1):42–62. Iss. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2017.1377083.
  • Milley, M. A. 2020. Developing Today’s Joint Officers for Tomorrow’s Ways of War: The Joint Chiefs of Staff Vision and Guidance for Professional Military Education & Talent Management. Washington: Joint Chiefs of Staff.
  • Moizer, J., J. Lean, M. Towler, and C. Abbey. 2009. “Simulations and Games: Overcoming the Barriers to Their Use in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 10 (3):207–24. doi: 10.1177/1469787409343188.
  • Nygaard, C., Courtney, N. & Leigh, E. (Eds.). 2012. Simulations, Games and Role Play in University Education. Oxfordshire, UK: Libri.
  • Scott, D., and S. D. Orr. 2022. “The Fast Fashion War: Wargaming the Role of Machine Learning and Agile Technology in near-Future Conflicts.” Small Wars Journal.
  • Perla, P. 1990. The Art of Wargaming: A Guide for Professionals and Hobbyists. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
  • Perla, P. 2022. “Wargaming and the Cycle of Research and Learning.” Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies 5 (1):197–208. doi: 10.31374/sjms.124.
  • Perla, P., and E. McGrady. 2011. “Why Wargaming Works.” Naval War College Review 64 (3):8.
  • Pettenger, M., D. West, and N. Young. 2013. “Assessing the Impact of Role-Play Simulations on Learning in Canadian and US Classrooms.” International Studies Perspectives 15 (4):491–508. doi: 10.1111/insp.12063.
  • Reddie, A. W., B. L. Goldblum, K. Lakkaraju, J. Reinhardt, M. Nacht, and L. Epifanovskaya. 2018. “Next-Generation Wargames.” Science 362 (6421):1362–1364. doi: 10.1126/science.aav2135.
  • Rubel, R. C. 2019. “Squeezing the Turnip: The Limits of Wargaming.” PAXsims.
  • Sabin, P. 2015. “Wargaming in Higher Education: Contributions and Challenges.” Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 15 (4):329–48. doi: 10.1177/1474022215577216.
  • Sasley, B. E. 2010. “Teaching Students How to Fail: Simulations as Tools of Explanation.” International Studies Perspectives 11 (1):61–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2009.00393.x.
  • Schechter, B., J. Schneider, and R. Shaffer. 2021. “Wargaming as a Methodology: The International Crisis Wargame and Experimental Wargaming.” Simulation & Gaming 52 (4):513–26. doi: 10.1177/1046878120987581.
  • Schneider, J. 2017. “Cyber Attacks on Critical Infrastructure: Insights from War Gaming.” War on the Rocks.
  • Sepinsky, J. 2021. “Is It a Wargame? It Doesn’t Matter: Rigorous Wargames versus Effective Wargaming.” War on the Rocks.
  • Shaw, C. M. 2004. “Using Role-Play Scenarios in the IR Classroom: An Examination of Exercises on Peacekeeping Operations and Foreign-Policy Decision Making.” International Studies Perspectives 5 (1):1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00151.x.
  • Shaw, C. M., and B. Switky. 2018. “Designing and Using Simulations in the International Relations Classroom.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (4):523–34. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1433543.
  • Shellman, S. M., and K. Turan. 2003. “The Cyprus Crisis: A Multilateral Bargaining Simulation.” Simulation & Gaming 34 (2):281–91. doi: 10.1177/1046878103034002007.
  • Shellman, S. M., and K. Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/15512160500484168.
  • Stapleton, P. A. 2020. “Knowledge Surveys as an Assessment Tool of Simulation Course Outcomes.” Journal of Political Science Education 16 (4):413–29. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1526089.
  • Tee, D. D., and P. K. Ahmed. 2014. “360 Degree Feedback: An Integrative Framework for Learning and Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (6):579–91. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.901961.
  • Wedig, T. 2010. “Getting the Most from Classroom Simulations: Strategies for Maximizing Learning Outcomes.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (3):547–55. doi: 10.1017/S104909651000079X.
  • Wong, Y. H., S. J. Bae, E. M. Bartels, and B. M. Smith. 2019. Next-Generation Wargaming for the U.S. Marine Corps. Santa Monica: RAND.
  • Wong, Y. H., and G. Heath. 2021. “Is the Department of Defense Making Enough Progress in Wargaming?” War on the Rocks.
  • Work, B., and P. Selva. 2015. “Revitalizing Wargaming is Necessary to Be Prepared for Future Wars.” War on the Rocks.
  • Wunische, A. 2019. “Lecture versus Simulation: Testing the Long-Term Effects.” Journal of Political Science Education 15 (1):37–48. Issdoi: 10.1080/15512169.2018.1492416.
  • Zenko, M. 2015. Red Team: How to Succeed by Thinking like the Enemy. New York: Basic Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.