179
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

From Laughter to Learning: Teaching Methods through Engaging Narrative Workshops

&
Received 30 Nov 2023, Accepted 08 May 2024, Published online: 20 May 2024

References

  • Adriaensen, Johan, Bart Kerremans, and Koen Slootmaeckers. 2015. “Editors’ Introduction to the Thematic Issue: Mad about Methods? Teaching Research Methods in Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (1):1–10. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2014.985017.
  • Alasuutari, Pertti, Leonard Bickman, and Julia Brannen. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Asal, Victor, Nakissa Jahanbani, Donnett Lee, and Jiacheng Ren. 2018. “Mini-Games for Teaching Political Science Methodology.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4):838–41. doi: 10.1017/S1049096518000902.
  • Aslan, Serkan. 2019. “The Impact of Argumentation-Based Teaching and Scenario-Based Learning Method on the Students’ Academic Achievement.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 18 (2):171–83. doi: 10.33225/jbse/19.18.171.
  • Banas, John A., Norah Dunbar, Dariela Rodriguez, and Shr-Jie Liu. 2011. “A Review of Humor in Educational Settings: Four Decades of Research.” Communication Education 60 (1):115–44. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.496867.
  • Bardach, Lisa, Robert M. Klassen, Tracy L. Durksen, Jade V. Rushby, Keiko C. P. Bostwick, and Lynn Sheridan. 2021. “The Power of Feedback and Reflection: Testing an Online Scenario-Based Learning Intervention for Student Teachers.” Computers & Education 169 (August):104194. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104194.
  • Berk, Ronald A. 1996. “Student Ratings of 10 Strategies for Using Humor in College Teaching.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 7 (3):71–92.
  • Berk, Ronald A., and Joy P. Nanda. 1998. “Effects of Jocular Instructional Methods on Attitudes, Anxiety, and Achievement in Statistics Courses.” Humor 11 (4):383–409.
  • Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, and Jane Sampson, eds. 2001. Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from & with Each Other. London, UK: Kogan Page
  • Bowden, John, and Ference Morton. 1998. The University of Learning: Beyond Quality and Competence in Higher Education. 1st ed. London: Kogan Page.
  • Christ, Thomas W. 2009. “Designing, Teaching, and Evaluating Two Complementary Mixed Methods Research Courses.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3 (4):292–325. doi: 10.1177/1558689809341796.
  • Coffey, Daniel J., William J. Miller, and Derek Feuerstein. 2011. “Classroom as Reality: Demonstrating Campaign Effects through Live Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (1):14–33. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2011.539906.
  • Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084444.
  • Elman, Colin, Diana Kapiszewski, and Dessislava Kirilova. 2015. “Learning through Research: Using Data to Train Undergraduates in Qualitative Methods.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (01):39–43. doi: 10.1017/S1049096514001577.
  • Fisher, Sarah, and Florian Justwan. 2018. “Scaffolding Assignments and Activities for Undergraduate Research Methods.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (1):63–71. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2017.1367301.
  • Frels, Rebecca K., Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, Nancy L. Leech, and Kathleen M. T. Collins. 2014. “Pedagogical Strategies Used by Selected Leading Mixed Methodologists in Mixed Research Courses.” Journal of Effective Teaching 14 (2):5–34.
  • Gamlath, Sharmila. 2022. “Peer Learning and the Undergraduate Journey: A Framework for Student Success.” Higher Education Research & Development 41 (3):699–713. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2021.1877625.
  • Garner, R. L. 2006. “Humor in Pedagogy: How Ha-Ha Can Lead to Aha!.” College Teaching 54 (1):177–80. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180.
  • Hesse-Biber, Sharlene. 2015. “The Problems and Prospects in the Teaching of Mixed Methods Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (5):463–77. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1062622.
  • Hursen, Cigdem, and Funda Gezer Fasli. 2017. “Investigating the Efficiency of Scenario Based Learning and Reflective Learning Approaches in Teacher Education.” European Journal of Contemporary Education 6 (2):264–79. doi: 10.13187/ejced.2017.2.264.
  • Ivankova, N. V., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2018. “Teaching Mixed Methods Research: Using a Socio-Ecological Framework as a Pedagogical Approach for Addressing the Complexity of the Field.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (4):409–24. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1427604.
  • Johnson, Rebecca E., Marie Murphy, and Frances Griffiths. 2019. “Conveying Troublesome Concepts: Using an Open-Space Learning Activity to Teach Mixed-Methods Research in the Health Sciences.” Methodological Innovations 12 (2):205979911986327. doi: 10.1177/2059799119863279.
  • Kher, Neelam, Susan Molstad, and Roberta Donahue. 1999. “Using Humor in the College Classroom to Enhance Teaching-Effectiveness in Dread Courses.” College Student Journal 33 (3):400–6.
  • King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Leech, Nancy L., and Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2007. “A Typology of Mixed Methods Research Designs.” Quality & Quantity 43 (2):265–75. doi: 10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3.
  • Michael, Joel. 2006. “Where’s the Evidence That Active Learning Works?” Advances in Physiology Education 30 (4):159–67. doi: 10.1152/advan.00053.2006.
  • Mosley, Layna, ed. 2013. Interview Research in Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Nesi, Hilary. 2012. “Laughter in University Lectures.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11 (2):79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.12.003.
  • Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., Rebecca K. Frels, Kathleen M. T. Collins, and Nancy L. Leech. 2013. “Conclusion: A Four-Phase Model for Teaching and Learning Mixed Research.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 7 (1):133–56. doi: 10.5172/mra.2013.7.1.133.
  • Pachirat, Timothy. 2018. Among Wolves – Ethnography and the Immersive Study of Power. Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods. New York: Routledge.
  • Rao, Deepa, and Ieva Stupans. 2012. “Exploring the Potential of Role Play in Higher Education: Development of a Typology and Teacher Guidelines.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (4):427–36. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.728879.
  • Schrader, Peter, Jawa Mariappan, and Angela Shih. 2004. “Scenario Based Learning Approach in Teaching Statics.” Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, ASEE Conferences, 9.1083.1–9.1083.7. doi: 10.18260/1-2–13347.
  • Stigmar, Martin. 2016. “Peer-to-Peer Teaching in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review.” Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 24 (2):124–36. doi: 10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963.
  • Sullivan, Heather, and Erica De Bruin. 2022. “Teaching Undergraduates Research Methods: A ‘Methods Lab’ Approach.” PS: Political Science & Politics 56 (2):309–14. doi: 10.1017/S1049096522001366.
  • Wanzer, Melissa B., and Ann B. Frymier. 1999. “The Relationship between Student Perceptions of Instructor Humor and Students’ Reports of Learning.” Communication Education 48 (1):48–62. doi: 10.1080/03634529909379152.
  • Zhou, Yuchun. 2023. “Teaching Mixed Methods Using Active Learning Approaches.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 17 (4):396–418. doi: 10.1177/15586898221120566.
  • Zhou, Yuchun, and Min Lun Wu. 2022. “Reported Methodological Challenges in Empirical Mixed Methods Articles: A Review on JMMR and IJMRA.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 16 (1):47–63. doi: 10.1177/1558689820980212.