http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2315-6097
References
- Long G, Sprig A. A comparative study of routine versus selective fetal anomaly ultrasound scanning. J Med Screen. 1998;5:6–10.
- Dandekar CP, Mysorekar VV, Rao SG, Anupama V. Perinatal autopsy - a six source study. Indian Pediatrics. 1998;35:545–8.
- Yeo L, Guzman ER, Shen-Schwarz S, Walters C, Vintzileos AM. Value of a complete sonographic survey in detecting fetal abnormalities: correlation with perinatal autopsy. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:501–10.
- Kalter H. Five decade international trend in the relation of perinatal mortality and congenital malformations; still births and neonatal death compared. Int J. Epidemiol. 1991;20:173–9.
- Widjaja AI, Mantel CD. Stillbirths in Auckland. New Zeal Med J. 1988;101:199–207.
- Puri RD, Thakur S, Verma IC. Utility of fetal evaluation in stillbirth—application for counseling and decreasing morbidity. 4th International Conference on Birth Defects and Disabilities in the Developing World, New Delhi 2009.
- Kumar SB, Vijaya JA, Prashanth BM, Ramaswamy AS. A study on concordance between ante-mortem and post-mortem diagnosis in fetal and perinatal autopsies. Int. J. Health Info Med Res. 2014;1:24–8.
- Malla BK. One source review study of congenital anatomical malformation at birth in Maternity Hospital (Prasutigriha), Thapathali, Kathmandu. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2007;5:557–60.
- Swain S, Agrawal A, Bhatia BD. Congenital malformations at birth. Indian Pediatr. 1994;31:1187–91.
- Karbasi SA, Golestan M, Fallah R, Mirnasseri F, Barkhordari K, Bafghee MS. Prevalence of congenital malformations. Acta Medica Iranica. 2009;47:149–53.
- Andola US, Am A, Ahuja M, Andola SK. Congenital malformations in perinatal autopsies - a study of 100 cases. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6:1726–30.
- Chinara PK, Singh S. East-West differentials in congenital malformations in India. Indian J Pediatr. 1982;49:325–9.
- Datta V, Chaturvedi P. Congenital malformations in rural Maharashtra. Indian Pediatr. 2000;37:998–1002.
- Boyd PA, Tondi F, Hicks NR, Chamberlain PF. Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328:137–40.
- Dutta HK, Bhattacharyya NC, Sarma JN, Kusre G. Congenital malformations in Assam. JIAPS. 2010;15:53–5.
- Shamim S, Chohan N, Qmar S. Pattern of congenital malformations and their neonatal outcome. J Surg Pakistan (Internat). 2010;15:34–7.
- Chescheir NC, Reitnauer PJ. A comparative study of prenatal diagnosis and perinatal autopsy. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:451–6.
- Amini H, Antonsson P, Papadogiannakis N, Ericson K, Pilo C, Eriksson L, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies terminated due to fetal anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:1208–16.
- Vimercati A, Grasso S, Abruzzese M, Chincoli A, de Gennaro A, Miccolis A, et al. Correlation between ultrasound diagnosis and autopsy findings of fetal malformations. J Prenat Med. 2012;6:13–7.
- Antonsson P, Sundberg A, Kublickas M, Pilo C, Ghazi S, Westgren M, Papadogiannakis N. Correlation between ultrasound and autopsy findings after 2nd trimester terminations of pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:59–69.
- Sankar VH, Phadke SR. Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and comparison with prenatal ultrasound findings. J Perinatol. 2006;26:224–9.
- Wang GB, Shan RQ, Ma YX, Shi H, Chen LG, et al. Fetal central nervous system anomalies: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for diagnosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2006;119:1272–7.