Fetal Genetic Diagnosis by Chorionic Villus Sampling: Evaluation of the Five-Year Experience from a Single Center

References

• Comas C, Echevarria M, Rodríguez I, Serra B, Cirigliano V. Prenatal invasive testing: A13-year single institution experience. J. Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:1209–1212. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.855893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng J, Matarese C, Crivello J, et al. Changes in and efficacies of indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis of cytogenomic abnormalities: 13 years of experience in a single center. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:1942–1948. doi:10.12659/MSM.893870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbrother G, Johnson S, Musci TJ, Song K. DNA for fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13, in a general screening population. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:580–583. doi:10.1002/pd.4092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 88: invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2007;110:1459–1467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brun J-L, Mangione R, Gangbo F, Guyon F, Taine L, Roux D, Maugey-Laulom B, Horovitz J, Saura R. Feasibility, accuracy and safety of chorionic villus sampling: a report of 10 741 cases. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:295–301. doi:10.1002/pd.578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Chorionic villus sampling green-top guideline no. 8; 2010. [accessed 06 February 2019]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Larion S, Warsof SL, Romary L, et al. Association of combined first-trimester screen and noninvasive prenatal testing on diagnostic procedures. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2014;123:1303–1310. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Navaratnam K, Mujezinovic F. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2017;9:CD003252. [accessed 2019 February 9]. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003252.pub2/epdf/full.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge P, Mota-Freitas M, Santos R, Silva M, Soares G, Fortuna A. A 26-year experience in chorionic villus sampling prenatal genetic diagnosis. J Clin Med. 2014;3:838–848. doi:10.3390/jcm3030838.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sikkema-Raddatz B, Bouman K, Verschuuren-Bemelmans CC, Stoepker M, Mantingh A, Beekhuis JR, de Jong B. Four years' cytogenetic experience with the culture of chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20:950–955. doi:10.1002/1097-0223(200012)20:12<950::AID-PD959>3.0.CO;2-V.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer K, Nicolaides KH. First trimester trisomy 13/trisomy 18 risk algorithm combining fetal nuchal translucency thickness, maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:877–879. doi:10.1002/pd.420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU practice parameter for the performance of standard diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:e13–e24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld YJ, Chueh J. Chorionic villus sampling: technique and training. Curr Opin Obstetrics Gynecol. 2010;22:146–151. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283372365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 162: prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2016;127:e108–e119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan HC, Ugur MG, Sucu S, et al. Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis. Turk J Obstetrics Gynecol. 2017;14:114–120. doi:10.4274/tjod.36097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YH, Park YW, Kim SK, Cho JS, Jeong MJ, Kim HS, Song CH. Chorionic villus sampling: clinical experience of the initial 750 cases. J Obstetrics Gynaecol Res. 1996;22:143–149. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.1996.tb00957.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siljee JE, Knegt AC, Knapen MFCM, Bekker MN, Visser GHA, Schielen PCJI. Positive predictive values for detection of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and termination of pregnancy rates after referral for advanced maternal age, first trimester combined test or ultrasound abnormalities in a national screening program (2007–2009). Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:259–264. doi:10.1002/pd.4302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Pan M, Zhen L, Yang X, Ou Y-M, Liao C, Li D-Z. Chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis: experience at a mainland Chinese hospital. J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 2014;34:669–672. doi:10.3109/01443615.2014.920793.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saatçi C, Bayramov R, Başbuğ M, et al. Retrospective evaluation of results of 3617 invasive prenatal diagnosis cases applied between 1997–2015 years. J Health Sci. 2016;25:120–125.
   Google Scholar
• Malone FD, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, et al. First-trimester septated cystic hygroma: Prevalence, natural history and pediatric outcome. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2005;106:288–294. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000173318.54978.1f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunninghman FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Williams obstetrics. 25th ed. New York (NY): McGraw Hill; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 163: screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2016;127:e123–e137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamillo CML, Krantz D, Evans M, Fiddler M, Pergament E. Nearly a third of abnormalities found after first-trimester screening are different than expected:10-year experience from a single center. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:251–256. doi:10.1002/pd.4054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawk AF, Saller DN. Screening for fetal aneuploidy: is maternal age relevant? Clin Obstetrics Gynecol. 2012;55:217–225. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182488309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaoguz MY, Bal F, Yakut T, et al. Cytogenetic results of amniocentesis materials: incidence of abnormal karyotypes in the Turkish collaborative study. Genetic Couns. 2006;17:219–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling. A systematic review. Obstetrics Gynecol. 2007;110:687–694. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000278820.54029.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akolekar R, Bower S, Flack N, Bilardo CM, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of miscarriage and stillbirth at 11–13 weeks and the contribution of chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:38–45. doi:10.1002/pd.2644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beta J, Zhang W, Geris S, et al. Procedure related risk of miscarriage from chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54:452–457. doi:10.1002/uog.20293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim SS. Chorionic villus sampling. J Genet Med. 2014;11:43–48. doi:10.5734/JGM.2014.11.2.43.
   Google Scholar
• Brambati B, Tului L, Cislaghi C, Alberti E. First 10 000 chorionic villus samplings performed on singleton pregnancies by a single operator. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:255–266. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199803)18:3<255::AID-PD255>3.0.CO;2-C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar