References
- Simpson J, Bombard A. Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion: frequency, pathology and genetic counseling. In: Edmonds K, editor. Spontaneous abortion. London: Blackwell; 1987. p. 51–75.
- McPadden J, Helm BM, Spangler BB, Ross LP, Boles DB, Schrier Vergano SA. Mosaic trisomy 15 in a liveborn infant. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A(4):821–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36958.
- Philipp T, Terry J, Feichtinger M, Grillenberger S, Hartmann B, Jirecek S. Morphology of early intrauterine deaths with full trisomy 15. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(4):267–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5230.
- Mercader N, Leonardo E, Piedra ME, Martínez-A C, Ros MA, Torres M. Opposing RA and FGF signals control proximodistal vertebrate limb development through regulation of Meis genes. Development. 2000;127(18):3961–70.
- Yashiro K, Zhao X, Uehara M, Yamashita K, Nishijima M, Nishino J, Saijoh Y, Sakai Y, Hamada H. Regulation of retinoic acid distribution is required for proximodistal patterning and outgrowth of the developing mouse limb. Dev Cell. 2004;6(3):411–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00062-0.
- Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson Å, Kampf C, Sjöstedt E, Asplund A. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260419.
- Zeller R, López-Ríos J, Zuniga A. Vertebrate limb bud development: moving towards integrative analysis of organogenesis. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(12):845–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2681.
- Kahlem P, Sultan M, Herwig R, Steinfath M, Balzereit D, Eppens B, Saran NG, Pletcher MT, South ST, Stetten G, et al. Transcript level alterations reflect gene dosage effects across multiple tissues in a mouse model of down syndrome. Genome Res. 2004;14(7):1258–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1951304.
- Lyle R, Gehrig C, Neergaard-Henrichsen C, Deutsch S, Antonarakis SE. Gene expression from the aneuploid chromosome in a trisomy mouse model of Down syndrome. Genome Res. 2004;14(7):1268–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2090904.
- Antonarakis SE, Lyle R, Dermitzakis ET, Reymond A, Deutsch S. Chromosome 21 and down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(10):725–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1448.
- Capdevila J, Tsukui T, Esteban CR, Zappavigna V, Belmonte JCI. Control of vertebrate limb outgrowth by the proximal factor Meis2 and distal antagonism of BMPs by Gremlin. Mol Cell. 1999;4(5):839–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80393-7.
- Mercader N, Leonardo E, Azpiazu N, Serrano A, Morata G, Martínez C, Torres M. Conserved regulation of proximodistal limb axis development by Meis1/Hth. Nature. 1999;402(6760):425–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/46580.
- Smith JE, Afonja O, Yee HT, Inghirami G, Takeshita K. Chromosomal mapping to 15q14 and expression analysis of the human MEIS2 homeobox gene. Mamm Genome. 1997;8(12):951–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900621.
- Liu ISC, Chen J-d, Ploder L, Vidgen D, van der Kooy D, Kalnins VI, Mclnnes RR. Developmental expression of a novel murine homeobox gene (Chx10): evidence for roles in determination of the neuroretina and inner nuclear layer. Neuron. 1994;13(2):377–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(94)90354-9.
- Zha Y, Xia Y, Ding J, Choi JH, Yang L, Dong Z, Yan C, Huang S, Ding HF. MEIS2 is essential for neuroblastoma cell survival and proliferation by transcriptional control of M-phase progression. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(9):e1417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2014.370.
- Machon O, Masek J, Machonova O, Krauss S, Kozmik Z. Meis2 is essential for cranial and cardiac neural crest development. BMC Dev Biol. 2015;15(1):40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12861-015-0093-6.
- Oulad-Abdelghani M, Chazaud C, Bouillet P, Sapin V, Chambon P, Dollé P. Meis2, a novel mouse Pbx-related homeobox gene induced by retinoic acid during differentiation of P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Dev Dyn. 1997;210(2):173–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199710)210:2<173::AID-AJA9>3.0.CO;2-D.
- Weaver DL, Krag DN, Manna EA, Ashikaga T, Harlow SP, Bauer KD. Comparison of pathologist-detected and automated computer-assisted image analysis detected sentinel lymph node micrometastases in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2003;16(11):1159–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MP.0000092952.21794.AD.
- Jaraj SJ, Comparo P, Boyle H, Germain F, Nilsson B, Petersson F, Egevad L. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of interpretation of immunohistochemical stains of prostate cancer. Virchows Arch. 2009;455(4):375–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-009-0833-8.
- Akbar S, Jordan LB, Purdie CA, Thompson AM, McKenna SJ. Comparing computer-generated and pathologist-generated tumour segmentations for immunohistochemical scoring of breast tissue microarrays. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(7):1075–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.309.
- Rizzardi AE, Johnson AT, Vogel R, Pambuccian SE, Henriksen J, Pn Skubitz A, Metzger GJ, Schmechel SC. Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring. Diagn Pathol. 2012;7(1):42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-42.
- Rizzardi AE, Zhang X, Vogel RI, Kolb S, Geybels MS, Leung Y-K, Henriksen JC, Ho S-M, Kwak J, Stanford JL, et al. Quantitative comparison and reproducibility of pathologist scoring and digital image analysis of estrogen receptor β2 immunohistochemistry in prostate cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2016;11(1):63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-016-0511-5.
- Tickle C. How the embryo makes a limb: determination, polarity and identity. J Anat. 2015;227(4):418–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12361.