Legitimation as a Particular Mode of Strategic Communication in the Public Sector

References

• Aggerholm, H. K., & Thomsen, C. (2015). Strategic communication: The role of polyphony in management team meetings. In D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 172–189). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Argenti, P. A., Howell, R. A., & Beck, K. A. (2005). The strategic communication imperative: Companies that continue to take a tactical, short-term approach to communicating with key constituencies will find it increasingly difficult to compete. Developing an integrated, strategic approach to communications will be critical to success. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. (2011). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K. K. (2016). Using extreme cases to understand organizations. In K. D. Kimberly & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative organizational research (pp. 33–44). New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C., & Haynes, J. (2001). Key constructs: Views from varying perspectives. In F. Jablin, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 47–77). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2008). The selection of agency as a rhetorical device: Opening up the scene of dialogue through ventriloquism. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 23–37). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62, 1–20. doi:10.1111/jcom.2012.62.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulek, R. E., & Campbell, K. S. (2015). On the dark side of strategic communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 122–142. doi:10.1177/2329488414560107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkama, N., & Vaara, E. (2010). Struggles over legitimacy in global organizational restructuring: A rhetorical perspective on legitimation strategies and dynamics in a shutdown case. Organization Studies, 31(7), 813–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frederikson, M., & Pallas, J. (2015). Strategic communication as institutional work. In D. Holtzhausen, & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 143–156). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. doi:10.1080/15531180701285244
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Strategic communication: Opportunities and challenges of the research area. In D. Holtzhausen, & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, S. (2006). New public management: Its impact on public servant’s identity: An introduction to this symposium. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 533–542. doi:10.1108/09513550610685970
   Google Scholar
• Joutsenvirta, M., & Vaara, E. (2009). Discursive (de)legitimation of a contested Finnish greenfield investment project in Latin America. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 85–96. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Koliba, C. (Eds.). (2013). Symposium transformations towards New Public Governance. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 1–8. doi:10.1080/12294659.2013.10805249
   Google Scholar
• Landau, M. J., & Keefer, L. A. (2014). This is like that: Metaphors in public discourse shape attitudes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 463–473. doi:10.1111/spc3.v8.8
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, S., & Davenport, S. (2002). Strategic ambiguity in communicating public sector change. Journal of Communication Management, 7(2), 129–139. doi:10.1108/13632540310807340
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K. (2000). Communicating change: Four cases of quality programs. Journal of Business Communication, 37(2), 128–155. doi:10.1177/002194360003700201
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1993). Risk, a sociological theory. Berlin, Germany: Rhodes.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (2004). Discourse, power and ideology: Unpacking the critical approach. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (Vol. 2, pp. 37–258). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 729–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. F., & Stephens, K. J. (2015). An introduction to strategic communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 3–11. doi:10.1177/2329488414560469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., & Steijn, B. (2009). Policy alienation of public professionals: Application in a New Public Management context. Public Management Review, 11(5), 685–706. doi:10.1080/14719030902798230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., & Monin, P. (2010). A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions. Organization Science, 21(1), 3–22. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789–813. doi:10.1177/0170840606061071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical perspective. Discourse Studies, 1, 83–118. doi:10.1177/1461445699001001005
   Google Scholar
• van Riel, C. B. M. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. London, UK: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Brewer, G. A., Boyne, G. A., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2011). Market orientation and public service performance: New public management gone mad? Public Administration Review, 71(5), 707–717. doi:10.1111/puar.2011.71.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar