2,494
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Empowering Engagement: Understanding Social Media User Sense of Influence

&

References

  • Austin, L., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2012). How audiences seek out crisis information: Exploring the social-mediated crisis communication model. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40, 188–207. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.654498
  • Barnes, S. B. (2013). Social networks: From text to video. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Botha, E., & Mills, A. J. (2012). Managing the new media: Tools for brand management in social media. In A. Close (Ed.), Online consumer behavior: Theory and research in social media, advertising and E-tail (pp. 83–100). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2011). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37, 37–43. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006
  • Broom, G. M., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (1997). Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9, 83–98. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0902_01
  • Bruce, P., & Shelley, R. (2010). Assessing stakeholder engagement. Communication Journal of New Zealand, 11(2), 30–48.
  • Campbell, C., Pitt, L. F., Parent, M., & Berthon, P. R. (2011). Understanding consumer conversations around ads in a web 2.0 world. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 87–102. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367400106
  • Chesebro, J. W., & Borisoff, D. J. (2007). What makes qualitative research qualitative? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8, 3–14. doi:10.1080/17459430701617846
  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). Internet contagion theory 2.0. How internet communication channels empower stakeholders. In S. Duhé (Ed.), New media and public relations (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 1–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • DiStaso, M. W., McCorkindale, T., & Wright, D. K. (2011). How public relations executives perceive and measure the impact of social media in their organizations. Public Relations Review, 37, 325–328. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.06.005
  • Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited brand. Business Horizons, 54(3), 193–207. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.001
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Huang, Y. H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. In J. A. Ledingham, & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationships management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 23–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Habibi, M. R., Laroche, M., & Richard, M. (2014). The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 152–161. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.016
  • Heath, R. L. (2007). Management through advocacy: Reflection rather than domination. In E. L. Toth (Ed.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 41–65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 93–114. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1201_6
  • Johnston, K. A. (2014). Public relations and engagement: Theoretical imperatives of a multi-dimensional concept. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 381–383. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.959863
  • Kang, M. (2014). Understanding public engagement: Conceptualizing and measuring its influence on supportive behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 399–416. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.956107
  • Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2014). Dialogic Engagement: Clarifying Foundational Concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398.
  • Ki, E.-J., & Hon, L. C. (2008). A measure of relationship cultivation strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/10627260802520488
  • Kvale, S. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 19–40. doi:10.1177/107780049500100103
  • Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38, 313–318. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
  • Madsen, V. T., & Verhoeven, J. W. M. (2016). Self-censorship on internal social media: A case study of coworker communication behavior in a Danish bank. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10, 387–409. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2016.1220010
  • McCay-Peet, L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2016). A model of social media engagement: User profiles, gratifications, and experiences. In H. O’Brien, & P. Cairns (Eds.), Why engagement matters: Cross-disciplinary perspectives of user engagement in digital media (pp. 199–217). New York, NY: Springer.
  • McCracken, G. (1993). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Men, L. R., (2011). How employee empowerment influences organization-employee relationships in China. Public Relations Review, 37, 435–437.
  • Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2014). Perceptual, attitudinal, and behavioral outcomes of organization–public engagement on corporate social networking sites. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 417–435. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.951047
  • O’Brien, H. (2016). Theoretical perspectives on user engagement. In H. O’Brien, & P. Cairns (Eds.), Why engagement matters: Cross-disciplinary perspectives of user engagement in digital media (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Oh, J., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). User engagement with interactive media: A communication perspective. In H. O’Brien, & P. Cairns (Eds.), Why engagement matters: Cross-disciplinary perspectives of user engagement in digital media (pp. 177–198)). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Pai, P., & Arnott, D. C. (2013). User adoption of social networking sites: Eliciting uses and gratifications through a means–end approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1039–1053. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.025
  • Rains, S. A., & Keating, D. M. (2011). The social dimension of blogging about health: Health blogging, social support, and well-being. Communication Monographs, 78(4), 511–534. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.618142
  • Saffer, A. J., Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2013). The effects of organizational twitter interactivity on organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39, 213–215. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.005
  • Saxton, G. D., & Waters, R. D. (2014). What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community-building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 280–299. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.908721
  • Seo, H., Kim, J. Y., & Yang, S.-U. (2009). Global activism and new media: A study of transnational NGOs’ online public relations. Public Relations Review, 35, 123–126. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.02.002
  • Sommerfeldt, E. (2011a). Activist e-mail action alerts and identification: Rhetorical relationship building strategies in collective action. Public Relations Review, 37, 87–89. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.10.003
  • Sommerfeldt, E. J. (2011b). Activist online resource mobilization: Relationship building features that fulfill resource dependencies. Public Relations Review, 37, 429–431. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.003
  • Steuber, K. R., & Solomon, D. H. (2011). Factors that predict married partners’ disclosures about infertility to social network members. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(3), 250–270. doi:10.1080/00909882.2011.585401
  • Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 384–398. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106
  • Toledano, M. (2010). Professional competition and cooperation in the digital age: A pilot study of New Zealand practitioners. Public Relations Review, 36, 230–237. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.04.009
  • Voorveld, H. A. M., Niejens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2011). The relation between actual and perceived interactivity: What makes the websites of top global brands truly interactive. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 77–92. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367400206
  • Weaver, C. K. (2010). Carnivalesque activism as a public relations genre: A case study of the New Zealand group Mothers Against Genetic Engineering. Public Relations Review, 36, 35–41. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.09.001
  • Williams, S. (2013). Is that all there is? A literature review and potential approach to measuring influence in social media. Paper presented at the Institute of Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, Fl.
  • Wright, D. K., & Hinson, M. D. (2012). Examining how social and emerging media have been used in public relations practice between 2006 and 2012: A longitudinal analysis. Public Relations Journal, 6(4). Retrieved from http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Documents/2012WrightHinson.pdf
  • Wright, D. K., & Hinson, M. D. (2014). An updated examination of social and emerging media use in public relations practice: A longitudinal analysis between 2006 and 2014. Public Relations Journal, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Documents/2014WrightHinson.pdf
  • Yang, S.-U., & Lim, S. (2009). The effects of blog-mediated public relations (BMPR) on relational trust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 341–359. doi:10.1080/10627260802640773
  • Ye, L., & Ki, E.-J. (2012). The status of online public relations research: An analysis of published articles in 1992–2009. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 409–434. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2012.723277

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.