Social Media Activities of Political Communication Practitioners: The Impact of Strategic Orientation and In-Group Orientation

References

• Avery, E., Lariscy, R., Amador, E., Ickowitz, T., Primm, C., & Taylor, A. (2010). Diffusion of social media among public relations practitioners in health departments across various community population sizes. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 336–358. doi:10.1080/10627261003614427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, E., Lariscy, R., & Sweetser, K. D. (2010). Social media and shared—Or divergent—Uses? A coorientation analysis of public relations practitioners and journalists. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 189–205. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2010.489501
   Google Scholar
• Avery, E. J., & Graham, M. W. (2013). Political public relations and the promotion of participatory, transparent government through social media. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7, 274–291. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2013.824885
   Google Scholar
• Bentele, G., Seidenglanz, R., & Fechner, R. (2015). Profession Pressesprecher – Vermessung eines Berufsstandes: Selbstverständnis, Strukturen, Kennzahlen des Kommunikationsmanagements. [Profession spokesman – Surveying a profession: Self-conception, structures, indicators of communication management]. Berlin, Germany: Bundesverband deutscher Pressesprecher.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, U., & Dohle, M. (2015). Local politics online: The influence of presumed influence on local politicians’ online communication activities in Germany. Local Government Studies, 41, 755–773. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1028624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, U., & Dohle, M. (2016). Constructive or repressive? Journalists’ reactions to the presumed political influences of online media. Studies in Communication ǀ Media, 5, 31–51. doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2016-1-31
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, U., Dohle, M., & Vowe, G. (2014). Wie werden Medien zur politischen Information genutzt und wahrgenommen? [How are the media used and perceived with regard to political information]. Media Perspektiven, n.d., 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, U., Dohle, M., & Vowe, G. (2016). Do presumed online media effects have an influence on the online activities of politicians? Policy & Internet, 8, 72–90. doi:10.1002/poi3.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brake, D. R. (2012). Who do they think they’re talking to? Framings of the audience by social media users. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1056–1076. Retrieved from http://www.ijoc.org/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2011). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37, 37–43. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 662–704. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S., & Moon, S.-I. (2016). Is the third-person effect real? A critical examination of rationales, testing methods, and previous findings of the third-person effect on censorship attitudes. Human Communication Research, 42, 312–337. doi:10.1111/hcre.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y., & Sheafer, T. (2008). The influence of presumed media influence in politics: Do politicians’ perceptions of media power matter? Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 331–344. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2013). Promotional cultures: The rise and spread of advertising, public relations, marketing and branding. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diga, M., & Kelleher, T. (2009). Social media use, perceptions of decision-making power, and public relations roles. Public Relations Review, 35, 440–442. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStaso, M. W., McCorkindale, T., & Wright, D. K. (2011). How public relations executives perceive and measure the impact of social media in their organizations. Public Relations Review, 37, 325–328. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W. (1983). Journalists’ conceptions of their audience: Comparative indicators for the way British and German journalists define their relations to the public. Gazette, 32, 19–36. doi:10.1177/001654928303200102
   Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W. (2004). Psychology of news decisions: Factors behind journalists’ professional behavior. Journalism, 5, 131–157. doi:10.1177/146488490452002
   Google Scholar
• Duhé, S. (2015). An overview of new media research in public relations journals from 1981 to 2014. Public Relations Review, 41, 153–169. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude, structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fisk, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 269–322). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Glynn, C. J. (2008). Theories on the perception of social reality. In W. Donsbach, & M. W. Traugott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 155–163). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eyrich, N., Padman, M. L., & Sweetser, K. D. (2008). PR practitioners’ use of social media tools and communication technology. Public Relations Review, 34, 412–414. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, S., Zerfass, A., & Linke, A. (2011). Social Media Governance 2011 – Kompetenzen, Strukturen und Strategien von Unternehmen, Behörden und Non-Profit-Organisationen für die Online-Kommunikation im Social Web. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie bei Kommunikationsverantwortlichen [Social Media Governance 2011 – Competences, structures, and strategies of companies, agencies, and non-profit organizations for online communication in the social web. Results of an empirical study among communication professionals]. Leipzig, Germany: Universität Leipzig, Fink & Fuchs Public Relations AG.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. G. (2014). More than friends: Popularity on Facebook and its role in impression formation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 358–372. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199–215. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1, 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Dohle, M. (2005). Publikumsvorstellungen im Rezeptionsprozess [A model of co-audience perceptions]. Publizistik, 50, 287–303. doi:10.1007/s11616-005-0133-5
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, S. (2012). Kommunikation bei Krisenausbruch: Wirkung von Krisen-PR und Koorientierung auf die journalistische Wahrnehmung [Communication at crisis break-out: Impact of crisis PR and coorientation on the journalistic perception]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D., & Zerfass, A. (2014). Strategic Communication: Opportunities and challenges of the research area. In D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18, 3–30. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentges, E., Brändli, M., Donges, P., & Jarren, O. (2012). Die Kommunikation politischer Interessengruppen in Deutschland: Adressaten, Instrumente und Logiken [The communication of political interest groups in Germany: Addressees, instruments, and logics]. Studies in Communication | Media, 1, 381–409. Retrieved from http://www.scm.nomos.de/
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., Luo, Y., & Kulemeka, O. (2017). Strategic social media use in public relations: Professionals’ perceived social media impact, leadership behaviors, and work-life conflict. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11, 18–41. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2016.1226842
   Google Scholar
• Khang, H., Ki, E.-J., & Ye, L. (2012). Social media research in advertising, communication, marketing, and public relations, 1997–2010. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 279–298. doi:10.1177/1077699012439853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. (1993). The interplay of private self-processes and interpersonal factors in self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self. Vol. 4: The self in social perspective (pp. 127–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. K., & Nichols, C. (2014). Social media and strategic communication: An examination of theory and practice in communication research. In D. Holtzhausen, & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 545–560). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J. S., & Golan, G. J. (2011). Social media activism in response to the influence of political parody videos on YouTube. Communication Research, 38, 710–727. doi:10.1177/0093650211405649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 330–345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V., & Paddon, A. R. (2000). Third-person perception and support for pornography restrictions: Some methodological problems. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 80–89. doi:10.1093/ijpor/12.1.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V., & Wei, R. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 13–33. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R. (2002). A caveat on using single-item versus multiple-item scales. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 68–75. doi:10.1108/02683940210415933
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J., & Zerfass, A. (2012). Social media communication in organizations: The challenges of balancing openness, strategy, and management. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6, 287–308. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2012.711402
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metag, J., & Marcinkowski, F. (2012). Strategic, structural, and individual determinants of online campaigning in German elections. Policy & Internet, 4, 136–158. doi:10.1002/poi3.14
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, A., Navarro, C., Tench, R., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Does social media usage matter? An analysis of online practices and digital media perceptions of communication practitioners in Europe. Public Relations Review, 41, 242–253. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuernbergk, C., & Conrad, J. (2016). Conversations and campaign dynamics in a hybrid media environment: Use of Twitter by members of the German Bundestag. Social Media + Society, 2(1), 1–14. doi:10.1177/2056305116628888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, H.-J., Gunther, A. C., McLeod, D. M., & Hove, T. (2011). How adolescents’ perceived media influence on peers affects smoking decisions. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 45, 123–146. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 252–268). New York, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, R. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. V., & Sallot, L. M. (2005). Web power: A survey of practitioners’ world wide web use and their perceptions of its effects on their decision-making power. Public Relations Review, 31, 111–119. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C., & Huismann, J. (2007). Beziehen sich Medien immer mehr auf Medien? Dimensionen, Belege, Erklärungen [Do media increasingly refer to media? Dimensions, proofs, and explanations]. Publizisitik, 52, 465–484. doi:10.1007/s11616-007-0243-3
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2010). “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 343–363. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmierbach, M., Boyle, M. P., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Understanding person perceptions: Comparing four common statistical approaches to third-person research. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 492–513. doi:10.1080/15205430802375311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selnow, G. (1998). Electronic whistle-stops: The impact of the Internet on American politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of western democracies (pp. 3–28). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sudulich, M. L., & Wall, M. (2009). Keeping up with the Murphys? Candidate cyber-campaigning in the 2007 Irish general election. Parliamentary Affairs, 62, 456–475. doi:10.1093/pa/gsp008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y. (2013). When presumed influence turns real: An indirect route of media influence. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 371–387). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58, 280–300. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2010). Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research, 37, 801–824. doi:10.1177/0093650210362684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence: Origins and implications of the third-person perception. In R. L. Nabi, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 99–112). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Tippelt, F., & Kupferschmitt, T. (2015). Social Web: Ausdifferenzierung der Nutzung – Potenziale für Medienanbieter [Social web: Differentiation of usage – potential for media providers]. Media Perspektiven, n.d., 442–452.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2013). Perceptions of media and media effects: The third-person effect, trust in media, and hostile media perceptions. In A. N. Valdivia & E. Scharrer (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media studies: Media effects/Media psychology (pp. 5–19). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (1999). What is political? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., Brückner, C., & Krämer, N. C. (2015). They came, they liked, they commented: Social influence on Facebook news channels. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 431–436. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Gonzenbach, W. J. (2008). Does a perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 375–385. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Verhoeven, P. (2013). European Communication Monitor 2013. A Changing Landscape – Managing Crises, Digital Communication and CEO Positioning in Europe. Results of a Survey in 43 Countries. Brussels, Belgium: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., & Moreno, A. (2014). European Communication Monitor 2014. Excellence in Strategic Communication – Key Issues, Leadership, Gender and Mobile Media. Results of a Survey in 42 Countries. Brussels, Belgium: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., Tench, R., & Verčič, D. (2016). European Communication Monitor 2016. Exploring trends in big data, stakeholder engagement and strategic communication. Results of a Survey in 43 Countries. Brussels, Belgium: EACD/EUPRERA, Quadriga Media Berlin.
   Google Scholar