The Role of Social Capital for Organizational Identification: Implications for Strategic Communication

References

• Adler, P., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–665. doi:10.2307/2393475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. B., Basler, C. R., & Coller, X. (1999). Organizational structures, cultures, and identities: Overlaps and divergences. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 213–235.
   Google Scholar
• Apker, J., Ford, W. S. Z., & Fox, D. H. (2003). Predicting nurses’ organizational and professional identification: The effect of nursing roles, professional autonomy, and supportive communication. Nursing Economics, 21(5), 226–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 207–242. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90051-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atouba, Y. C., Carlson, E. J., & Lammers, J. C. (2016). Directives and dialogue: Examining the relationship between participative organizational communication practices and organizational identification among IT workers. International Journal of Business Communication. doi:10.1177/2329488416672430
   Google Scholar
• Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–124. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, J., Peters, O., De Jong, M., Pruyn, A., & Van Der Molen, M. (2010). Horizontal and vertical communication as determinants of professional and organisational identification. Personnel Review, 39(2), 210–226. doi:10.1108/00483481011017426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkhoff, B. (1997). Better performance through organizational identification: A test of outcomes and antecedents based on social identity theory. In J. Wickham (Ed.), The search for competitiveness and its implications for employment (pp. 159–179). Dublin, Ireland: Oak Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. (1996). Organizational identification: Conceptualization measurement, and nomological validity. Working paper, The University of Michigan Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555–577. doi:10.1348/014466600164633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergami, M., Corrado, R., & Lomi, A. (1997). La base relazionale dell’identificazione con l’organizzazione. In A. Lomi (Ed.), L’analisi relazionale dell’organizzazione: L’analisi relazionale delle organizzazioni (pp. 113–145). Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H., & Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59, 46–57. doi:10.2307/1252327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1966). Sociological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 71, 535–548. doi:10.1086/224171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social. Actes De La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 31, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, D. (1992). Power in organizations: A social network perspective. In G. Moore & J. A. White (Eds.), Research in politics and society (pp. 295–323). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, D., & Burkhardt, M. (1992). Centrality and power in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Network and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 191–215). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M., & Miller, N. (Eds.). (1984). Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation. London, England: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (1982). Towards a structural theory of action. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 345–423). Amsterdam; the Netherlands, London, England, and New York, NY: Elsevier Science JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London,, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Freund, A. (2002). The relationship between work and workplace attitudes and perceived external prestige. Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 51–68. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540164
   Google Scholar
• Cassel, J. (1974). Psychosocial processes and stress: Theoretical formulations. International Journal of Health Services, 4, 471–482. doi:10.2190/WF7X-Y1L0-BFKH-9QU2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (1983a). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69(2), 143–158. doi:10.1080/00335638309383643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (1983b). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communications Monographs, 50(4), 342–362. doi:10.1080/03637758309390174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chreim, S. (2002). Influencing organizational identification during major change: A communication-based perspective. Human Relations, 55(9), 1117–1137. doi:10.1177/0018726702055009022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. doi:10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Scribner’s.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 928–937. doi:10.2307/20159632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12, 259–274. doi:10.2307/248851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukerich, J., Golden, B., & Shortell, S. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 507–533. doi:10.2307/3094849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, J., Dukerich, J., & Harquail, C. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263. doi:10.2307/2393235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, E., Monge, P., & Miller, K. (1984). Involvement in communication networks as a predictor of organizational commitment. Human Communication Research, 10, 179–201. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00010.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41. doi:10.2307/2089716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flap, H. (2004). Creation and returns of social capital. In H. Flap & B. Volker (Eds.), Creation and returns of social capital (pp. 3–24). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flap, H. D. (1991). Social capital in the reproduction of inequality. Comparative Sociology of Family, Health and Education, 20, 6179–6202.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 238–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittell, J. H. (2002). Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Science, 48, 1408–1426. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1408.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. (1998). Individuals’ need for organizational identification (nOID): Speculations on individual differences in the propensity to identify. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations. Building theory through conversations (pp. 238–244). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105–130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., & Schneider, B. (1972). Correlates of organizational identification as a function of career pattern and organizational type. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 340–350. doi:10.2307/2392147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 176–190. doi:10.2307/2391488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., Van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1, 3–35. doi:10.1080/15531180701285244
   Google Scholar
• Harquail, C. (1998). Organizational identification and the ‘whole person’: Integrating affect, behavior, and cognition. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations. Building theory through conversations (pp. 223–231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, R., & Johnson, J. (1989). Social contagion and multiplexity: Communication networks as predictors of commitment and role ambiguity. Human Communication Research, 15, 523–548. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, A., Cheney, G., & Weaver, C. K. (2015). The role of employee identification and organizational identity in strategic communication and organizational issues management about genetic modification. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 12–41. doi:10.1177/2329488414560278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An interpersonal perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis’. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1–44). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J. R., & Jamieson, B. B. (2015). Human capital, social capital, and social network analysis: Implications for strategic human resource management. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29, 370–385. doi:10.5465/amp.2014.0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, C., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1989). Computer communication and organizational commitment. Tracing the relationship in a city government. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 137, 1–1391.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277–303. doi:10.2307/2393414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16, 359–371. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30, 146–165. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K., & Shah, P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775–790. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., & Volpe, E. H. (2011). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 413–434. doi:10.1002/job.694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapferer, B. (1969). Norms and the manipulation of relationships in a work context. In J. C. Mitchell (Ed.), Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in central African towns (pp. 181–244). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ki, E. J., & Hon, L. C. (2008). A measure of relationship cultivation strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 1–24. doi:10.1080/10627260802520488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to belief. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D. (2001). Changing organizations: Business networks in the new political economy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korman, A. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 31–41. doi:10.1037/h0028656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342–369. doi:10.2307/2393394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216–239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123–140. doi:10.2307/2786835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 191–198). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, G., & Ashforth, B. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–27. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T., & Nelson, N. (2002). Reengineering identity. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 5–38. doi:10.1177/0893318902161001
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, K. J. (2009). Formal and informal network coupling and its relationship to workplace attachment. Sociological Perspectives, 52, 455–479. doi:10.1525/sop.2009.52.4.455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (1986). Conceptualizing social support. In N. Lin, A. Dean, & W. Ensel (Eds.), Social support, life events, and depression (pp. 17–30). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22, 28–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N., Vaughn, C., & Ensel, W. (1981). Social resources and occupational-status attainment. Social Forces, 59, 1163–1181. doi:10.1093/sf/59.4.1163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. (1992). Alumni and their alma maters: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Men, L. R., & Jiang, H. (2016). Cultivating quality employee-organization relationships: The interplay among organizational leadership, culture, and communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10, 462–479. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2016.1226172
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In J. C. Mitchell (Ed.), Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in central African towns (pp. 1–50). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakra, R. (2006). Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational identification: An empirical study. Vision, 10(2), 41–51. doi:10.1177/097226290601000206
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014). Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1219–1243. doi:10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Social networks and mobility. American Sociological Review, 62, 673–693. doi:10.2307/2657354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. (1998). Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations. Building theory through conversations (pp. 171–207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reade, C. (2001). Antecedents of organizational identification in multinational corporations: Fostering psychological attachment to the local subsidiary and the global organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 1269–1291. doi:10.1080/09585190110083794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 217–233. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 1–54). Chicago: Italy: Clair Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 427–456. doi:10.2307/2392182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C., Corman, S., & Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a structurational model theory of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298–336. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S., & Lane, V. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25, 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidts, A., Pruyn, A., & Van Riel, C. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1051–1062. doi:10.2307/3069448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. D. (2013). Strategic planning for public relations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (1987). The vitalization of symbolic interactionism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 83–94. doi:10.2307/2786893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Torp, S. M. (2015). The strategic turn in communication science: On the history and role of strategy in communication science from ancient Greece until the present day. In D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 34–52). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698. doi:10.2307/2096399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19–61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (1992). Which types of ties and networks give what kinds of social support? Advances in Group Processes, 9, 207–235.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588. doi:10.1086/229572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27, 213–229. doi:10.1177/014920630102700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1998). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), 0–0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00081.x
   Google Scholar