Hybrid Strategy—Interference or Integration? How Corporate Communication Impacts Consumers’ Memory and Company Evaluation

References

• Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974). A propositional theory of recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 2, 406–412. doi:10.3758/BF03196896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999). Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 608–629. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.608
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 237–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1959). “Fate” of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97–105. doi:10.1037/h0047507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blankenship, A. B., & Whitely, P. L. (1941). Proactive inhibition in the recall of advertising material. The Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 311–322. doi:10.1080/00224545.1941.9714081
   Google Scholar
• Brønn, P. G. (2010). Reputation, communication, and the corporate brand. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), The Sage handbook of public relations (pp. 307–320). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H., & Maylor, E. A. (2017). Memory consolidation effects on memory stabilization and item integration in older adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1032–1039. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1197-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. doi:10.2307/1252190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, R. R., & Srull, T. K. (1988). Competitive interference and consumer memory for advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 55–68. doi:10.1086/209145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceraso, J., & Henderson, A. (1966). Unavailability and associative loss in RI and PI: Second try. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 314–316. doi:10.1037/h0023455
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, Z. F., Hong, C., & Li, C. (2017). The joint effect of association-based corporate posting strategy and eWOM comment valence on social media. Internet Research, 27, 1039–1057. doi:10.1108/IntR-05-2016-0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delprato, D. J., & Garskof, B. E. (1969). Free and modified free recall measures of response recall and unlearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 408–410. doi:10.1037/h0027755
   Google Scholar
• Fraustino, J. D., & Connolly-Ahern, C. (2015). Corporate associations written on the wall: Public’s responses to Fortune 500 ability and social responsibility Facebook posts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 452–474. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2015.1098543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Goh, M. F. (2014). Effects of program‐advertisement congruity and advertisement emotional appeal on memory for health and safety advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 60–70. doi:10.1111/jasp.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, L. T., & Thomas, A. K. (2014). Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 42, 186–197. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0361-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckler, S. E., Keller, K. L., Houston, M. J., & Avery, J. (2014). Building brand knowledge structures: Elaboration and interference effects on the processing of sequentially advertised brand benefit claims. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20, 176–196. doi:10.1080/17544750.2012.660766
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, G. E., & Anderson, J. A. (Eds.). (2014). Parallel models of associative memory: Updated edition. Abingdon, VA: Psychology press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, K. T. (2012). The advertising effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and brand equity: Evidence from the life insurance industry in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 189–201. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1118-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2013). On the importance of looking back: The role of recursive reminding in recency judgments and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 41, 625–637. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0298-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 97–105. doi:10.2307/1252313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel, G., Postman, L., & Zavortink, B. (1967). Response availability in free and modified free recall for two transfer paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 654–660. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80031-8
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2011). Transferring effects of CSR strategy on consumer responses: The synergistic model of corporate communication strategy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23, 218–241. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2011.555647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2013). Corporate ability or virtue? Relative effectiveness of prior corporate associations in times of crisis. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7, 241–256. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2013.824886
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2019). The process model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with consumers’ CSR knowledge, trust, and corporate reputation perception. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 1143–1159. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Kim, S. Y., & Hoon Sung, K. (2014). Fortune 100 companies’ Facebook strategies: Corporate ability versus social responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, 18, 343–362. doi:10.1108/JCOM-01-2012-0006
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Rader, S. (2010). What they do versus how much they care: Assessing corporate communication strategies on Fortune 500. Journal of Communication Management, 14, 59–80. doi:10.1108/13632541011017816
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Park, H., & Kim, J. K. (2019). Corporate association strategies and consumer responses: The relative effectiveness of CA versus CSR communication strategy by industry type. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25, 204–227. doi:10.1080/13527266.2017.1393766
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y. (2016). How can companies succeed in forming CSR reputation? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21, 435–449. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-01-2016-0009
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., Lim, E. R., & Drumwright, M. E. (2018). Hybrid happening: Organizational reputations in corporate crises. Public Relations Review, 44, 598–609. doi:10.1080/13527266.2017.1393766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebers, N., Breves, P., Schallhorn, C., & Schramm, H. (2019). Fluency in commercial breaks: The impact of repetition and conceptual priming on brand memory, evaluation, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Promotion Management, 25, 783–798. doi:10.1080/10496491.2018.1536620
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, S. M. C., & Lopes, J. (2019). How corporate social responsibility initiatives in social media affect awareness and customer engagement. Journal of Promotion Management, 25, 419–438. doi:10.1080/10496491.2019.1557819
   Google Scholar
• Madrigal, R. (2000). The role of corporate associations in new product evaluation. In S. J. Hoch & R. J. Meyer (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 27, pp. 80–86). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mantonakis, A., Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Yoon, C. (2008). Consumer memory, fluency, and familiarity. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 77–102). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marquina, P., & Morales, C. E. (2012). The influence of CSR on purchasing behavior in Peru and Spain. International Marketing Review, 29, 299–312. doi:10.1108/02651331211229778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeoth, J. A. (1942). The psychology of human learning. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelson, D., Wright, D. K., & Stacks, D. W. (2012). Evaluating efficacy in public relations/corporate communication programming: Towards establishing standards of campaign performance. Public Relations Journal, 6(5). Retrieved from http://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/Michaelson-Wright-Stacks-PR-Journal-2012-Vol-6-No-5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. R., Eden, L., & Li, D. (2018). CSR reputation and firm performance: A dynamic approach. Journal of Business Ethics. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4057-1
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., O’Brien, E. J., Balota, D. A., & Toyofuku, M. L. (1984). Memory search without interference: The role of integration. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 217–242. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(84)90008-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C., Romaniuk, J., Faulkner, M., & Cohen, J. (2018). Are two brands better than one? Investigating the effects of co-branding in advertising on audience memory. Marketing Letters, 29, 37–48. doi:10.1007/s11002-017-9444-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen. (2014). Global consumers are willing to put their money where their heart is when it comes to goods and services from companies committed to social responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2014/global-consumers-are-willing-to-put-their-money-where-their-heart-is.html
   Google Scholar
• Old, S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23, 104–118. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauls, F., Petermann, F., & Lepach, A. C. (2013). Gender differences in episodic memory and visual working memory including the effects of age. Memory, 21, 857–874. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.765892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman, L., Stark, K., & Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 7, 672–694. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80124-0
   Google Scholar
• Redick, T. S., Wiemers, E. A., & Engle, R. W. (2019). The role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer. Psychological Research. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01172-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, E. E., Adams, N., & Schorr, D. (1978). Fact retrieval and the paradox of interference. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 438–464. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90007-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacks, D. W. (2016). Primer of public relations research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storm, B. C., & Levy, B. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40, 827–843. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0211-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, W. (2018). How consumers’ pre-crisis associations and attitude certainty impact their responses to different crises. Communication Research, 45, 815–839. doi:10.1177/0093650217733361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, W., & Song, B. (2020). The interplay between post-crisis response strategy and pre-crisis corporate associations in the context of CSR crises. Public Relations Review. Online advanced publication. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, W., Song, B., Ferguson, M. A., & Kochhar, S. (2018). Employees’ prosocial behavioral intentions through empowerment in CSR decision-making. Public Relations Review, 44, 667–680. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, W., & Wilson, C. (2015). Fortune 1000 communication strategies on Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Communication Management, 19, 208–223. doi:10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, W., & Wilson, C. (2016). The impact of corporate communication on company evaluation: Examining the message effects of CSR, corporate ability, and hybrid strategies. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10, 426–444. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2016.1223671
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, B. J. (1948). “Spontaneous recovery” of verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 429–439. doi:10.1037/h0059565
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahlheim, C. N. (2015). Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information. Memory & Cognition, 43, 27–38. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0455-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2013). Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 1–15. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0246-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar