References
- Aakhus, M., & Lewiński, M. (2017). Advancing polylogical analysis of large-scale argumentation: Disagreement management in the fracking controversy. Argumentation, 31(1), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9403-9
- Allen, M. W., & Caillouet, R. H. (1994). Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisis. Communications Monographs, 61(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376322
- Benoit, W. L. (1995). Sears’ repair of its auto service image: Image restoration discourse in the corporate sector. Communication Studies, 46(1–2), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979509368441
- Benoit, W. L. (2013). Image repair theory and corporate reputation. In C. E. Carrol (Ed.), The handbook of communication and corporate reputation (pp. 213–212). John Wiley & Sons.
- Benoit, W. L. (2014). President Barack Obama’s image repair on HealthCare. gov. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 733–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.003
- Benoit, W. L., & Czerwinski, A. (1997). A critical analysis of USAir’s image repair discourse. Business Communication Quarterly, 60(3), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999706000304
- Blair, J. A., & Johnson, R. H. (2000). Informal logic: An overview. Informal Logic, 20(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i2.2262
- Brazeal, L. M. (2008). The image repair strategies of Terrell Owens. Public Relations Review, 34(2), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.03.021
- Brinton, A. (1986). Ethotic argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 3(3), 245–257.
- Budzynska, K. (2013). Circularity in ethotic structures. Synthese, 190(15), 3185–3207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0135-6
- Choi, Y., & Lin, Y. H. (2009). Consumer responses to mattel product recalls posted on online bulletin boards: Exploring two types of emotion. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802557506
- Coombs, W. T. (1995). Choosing the right words the development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(4), 447–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318995008004003
- Coombs, W. T. (1998). An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1003_02
- Coombs, W. T., Frandsen, F., Holladay, S. J., & Johansen, W. (2010). Why a concern for apologia and crisis communication? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(4), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011085466
- Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0804_04
- Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). Amazon. com’s orwellian nightmare: Exploring apology in an online environment. Journal of Communication Management, 16(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541211245758
- Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2014). How publics react to crisis communication efforts: Comparing crisis response reactions across sub-arenas. Journal of Communication Management, 18(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-03-2013-0015
- Crijns, H., Cauberghe, V., Hudders, L., & Claeys, A. S. (2017). How to deal with online consumer comments during a crisis? The impact of personalized organizational responses on organizational reputation. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.046
- Czarnecki, S. (2018). Timeline of a crisis: Starbucks’ racial bias training. Prweek.com. Retrieved August 15, 2020, from https://www.prweek.com/article/1486260/timeline-crisis-starbucks-racial-bias-training
- Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603261748
- Eemeren, F. H., Van, G. R., Henkemans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., Plantin, C., Walton, D. N., Willard, C. A., Woods, J., & Zarefski, D. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Fisher, A. (1988). The logic of real arguments. Cambridge University Press.
- Flavian, C., Guinaliu, M., & Torres, E. (2005). The influence of corporate image on consumer trust: A comparative analysis in traditional versus internet banking. Internet Research, 15(4), 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510615191
- Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2017). Organizational crisis communication: A multivocal approach. Sage.
- Freeman, J. B. (1991). Dialectics and the macrostructure of argument. Foris.
- Freeman, J. B. (2011). Argument structure: Representation and theory. Springer.
- Fuoli, M., & Paradis, C. (2014). A model of trust-repair discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001
- Heath, R. L. (2001). Handbook of public relations. Sage.
- Holtzhausen, D. R., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Strategic communication: Opportunities and challenges of the research area. In D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 3–17). Routledge.
- Huang, Y. H., Lin, Y. H., & Su, S. H. (2005). Crisis communicative strategies in Taiwan: Category, continuum, and cultural implication. Public Relations Review, 31(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.02.016
- Ice, R. (1991). Corporate publics and rhetorical strategies. The case of union Carbide’s Bhopal crisis. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318991004003004
- Ingenhoff, D., & Sommer, K. (2010). Trust in companies and in CEOs: A comparative study of the main influences. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 339–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0363-y
- Jacobs, S. (2011). The pragmatic and dialectical dynamics of an illegitimate argument. Informal Logic, 21(3), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v21i3.3395
- Johansen, B. F., Johansen, W., & Weckesser, N. M. (2016). Emotional stakeholders as “crisis communicators” in social media: The case of the Telenor customer complaints crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2015-0026
- Kandil, H. (2019). How different stakeholders react online to organizational crisis responses: A case-study of Starbucks’ 2018 racial profiling crisis [ Master dissertation], University of Liverpool.
- Keck, C. (2019). Mark Zuckerberg thinks you don’t trust facebook because you don’t ‘understand’ it. Gizmodo.com. Retrieved July 25, 2020, from https://gizmodo.com/mark-zuckerberg-thinks-you-dont-trust-facebook-because-1832040327
- Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
- Kramer, R. M., & Lewicki, R. J. (2010). Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 245–277. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.487403
- Lewicki, R. (2006). Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 92–119). John Wiley & Sons.
- Lewiński, M., & Aakhus, M. (2014). Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: A methodological inquiry. Argumentation, 28(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9307-x
- Lomas, N. (2019). The facts about Facebook. Zuckerberg wants to redefine “transparency, choice and control” – Let’s not give him consent. Techcrunch.com. Retrieved 25 July 2020 https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/26/the-facts-about-facebook
- Marsh, C. (2006). The syllogism of apologia: Rhetorical stasis theory and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.11.002
- Massey, J. E. (2001). Managing organizational legitimacy: Communication strategies for organizations in crisis. Journal of Business Communication, 38(2), 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360103800202
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
- Millar, D. P., & Heath, R. L. (Eds.). (2004). Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication. LEA.
- Musi, E., & Aakhus, M. (2018). Discovering argumentative patterns in energy polylogues: A macroscope for argument mining. Argumentation, 32(3), 397–430.
- Musi, E., Aakhus, M., Muresan, S., Rocci, A., & Stede, M. (2018, 20-23 June). From Theory to practice: The annotation of argument schemes. Argumentation and inference. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ECA (European Conference for argumentation) Conference, Fribourg, pp. 603–613.
- Nair, S. (2019). Trust in tech is wavering and companies must act. Edelman. Retrieved January 2020, 13, from https://www.edelman.com/research/2019-trust-tech-wavering-companies-must-act
- Niedermeir, F. (2012). Facebook as an instrument of strategic communication: A content analysis of the Nestle palm oil crisis. Ilmenau University of Technology. www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-25856/IRGoCC_vol2_issue1.pdf.
- Oswald, S., & Hart, C. (2014). Trust based on bias: Cognitive constraints on source-related fallacies. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario society for the study of argumentation (OSSA) (pp. 1–13). Windsor, ON, Canada: OSSA.
- Paglieri, F. (2014). Trust, argumentation and technology. Argument & Computation, 5(2–3), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2014.913262
- Palmieri, R. (2009). Regaining trust through argumentation in the context of the current financial-economic crisis. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(2), 59–78.
- Palmieri, R. (2014). Corporate argumentation in takeover bids. John Benjamins.
- Palmieri, R., & Musi, E. (2019). Trust-oriented argumentation in rhetorical sub-arenas: From corporate communication to online stakeholder discussions. The “the facts about Facebook” case. In: F. Grasso, N. Green, J. Shneider, & S. Wells (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19 CMNA workshop (pp. 49–56). Limassol (Cyprus): ceur-ws.org/Vol-2346
- Palmieri, R., & Aakhus, M. (2015). “Our clients have their say”. Argumentative designs for stakeholder engagement and trust repair in crisis contexts [Paper presented]. 2nd International Conference on discourse approaches to financial communication. USI, Lugano, July 3, 2017.
- Peldszus, A., & Stede, M. (2015, June). An annotated corpus of argumentative microtexts. In Argumentation and reasoned action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on argumentation (Vol.2, pp. 801–816), Lisbon.
- Pinto, R. (2001). Argument, inference and dialectic: Collected papers on informal logic. Springer.
- Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 481–518. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4
- Rigotti, E. (2008). Locus a causa finali. In G. Gobber, S. Cantarini, S. Cigada, M. C. Gatti, & S. Gilardoni (Eds.), Word meaning in argumentative dialogue. Special issue of L’analisi linguistica e letteraria (Vol. 16(2), pp. 559–576). Milan: Educatt.
- Rigotti, E. (2009). Whether and how classical topics can be revived in the contemporary theory of argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. J. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation (pp. 157–178). Springer.
- Rigotti, E., & Greco, S. (2019). Inference in argumentation: A topics-based approach to argument schemes. Springer.
- Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1997). Analyzing complex argumentation. The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. Sic Sat.
- Thiessen, A., & Ingenhoff, D. (2011). Safeguarding reputation through strategic, integrated and situational crisis communication management. Development of the integrative model of crisis communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281111100944
- Thomas, S. N. (1981). Practical reasoning in natural language. Prentice-Hall.
- Tindale, C. W. (1999). Acts of arguing. A rhetorical model of argument. State University of New York Press.
- Tomlinson, E. C., & Mayer, R. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.35713291
- van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. University of Alabama.
- van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001004005
- Walton, D. (1998). Ad Hominem arguments. University of Alabama Press.
- Ware, B. L., & Linkugel, W. A. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383176
- Weisbaum, H. (2018). Zuckerberg’s apology tour has not done much to regain user trust. NBC News. Retrieved January 13, 2020, from https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/trust-facebook-has-dropped-51-percent-cambridge-analytica-scandal-n867011
- Werder, A. (1999). Argumentation rationality of management decisions. Organization Science, 10(5), 672–690. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.672
- Xie, Y., & Peng, S. (2009). How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity, benevolence, and forgiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20289
- Zhang, B., Marita, V., Veijalainen, J., Wang, S., & Kotkov, D. (2016). The issue arena of a corporate social responsibility crisis–The Volkswagen case in Twitter. Studies in Media and Communication, 4(2), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v4i2.1746
- Zuckerberg, M (2019). The Facts about Facebook. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 7 October 2020. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facts-about-facebook-11548374613