How Multiple Identities Can Impact the Legitimacy of an Organization

References

• Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.
   Google Scholar
• Argenti, P. A. (2013). Corporate communication (6. ed. ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., Jermier, J., & Lafferrty, B. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550012
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belasen, A. T. (2008). The theory and practice of corporate communication: A competing values perspective. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, J., Liao, Y., Wang, Y., & Tao, F. (2021). Analysis of firm CSR strategies. European Journal of Operational Research, 290(3), 914–926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessing, A. (2015). Public, private, or in-between? the legitimacy of social enterprises in the housing market. Voluntas (Manchester, England), 26(1), 198–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9422-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukes, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2020). A general pattern in the construction of economic newsworthiness? Analyzing news factors in popular, quality, regional, and financial newspapers. Journalism, 21(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917725989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540188
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. P., & Elving, W. J. L. (2003). Managing corporate identity: An integrative framework of dimensions and determinants. Corporate Communications, 8(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/1356328031047553
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00075-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 49, 77.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efting, M. (2011). Boeddonoren dreigen met boycot om loon bestuurders. [Blood donors threaten to boycott for executives’ wages]. De Volkskrant.
   Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D. (2003). Organizational perception management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 297–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C. J., Ponzi, L. J., & Newburry, W. (2015). Stakeholder tracking and analysis: The RepTrak® system for measuring corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 18(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2014.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.618.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman, P. O., Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2012). An identity-based view of reputation, image, and legitimacy: Clarifications and distinctions among related constructs. In T. Pollock, & M. Barnett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation (pp. 179–200). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2015). Organizations, stakeholders, and intermediaries: Towards a general theory. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(4), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2015.1064125
   Google Scholar
• Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2019). Crisis communication and organizational legitimacy. In J. Rendtorff (Ed.), Handbook of business legitimacy (pp. 1–20). Springer Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Frederik, J., Medendorp, H., & Jonkers, A. (2021). Zo hadden we het niet bedoeld: De tragedie achter de toeslagenaffaire [We didn’t mean it like that: The tragedy behind the Social Security Supplements mess (2021st ed.). De Correspondent.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, M., Schillemans, T., & Pallas, J. (2015). Determinants of organizational mediatization: An analysis of the adaptation of Swedish government agencies to news media. Public Administration, 93(4), 1049–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder theory. Wiley Encyclopaedia of Management, (1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman Andrew, L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders. theory and practice (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geurtsen, A. (2014). Accountability standards and legitimacy of not-for-profit organizations in the Netherlands. International Review of Public Administration, 19(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2014.912451
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006110106408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, D., Gonzales, J. L., & Castanon, J. (2006). The importance of reputation and the role of public relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 51(3), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123–192. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.762225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2007). Composing qualitative research (Second Edition ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Heckert, R. (2019). Challenges for a multiple identity organization: A case study of the Dutch blood supply foundation. Corporate Reputation Review, 22(3), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-019-00065-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckert, R., Boumans, J., & Vliegenthart, R. (2020). How to nail the multiple identities of an organization? a content analysis of projected identity. Voluntas (Manchester, 31(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00157-w
   Google Scholar
• Heckert, R., Boumans, J., & Vliegenthart, R. (2021). How do media portray multiple identity organizations?. International Journal of Communication (Online), 15, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Bacha, C., & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Opinion polls and the media: Reflecting and shaping public opinion. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Inn, H. (1975). Holiday inn ‘Surprise!’ commercial. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiR5HrmKTyAhVNm6QKHdg0CdQQtwJ6BAgCEAM&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DWNh5uY1ePcA&usg=AOvVaw1LI2Jw4t0klTV2MDuLTwJ9
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., & Schillemans, T. (2016). Media and public accountability: Typology and exploration. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14431855320366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkman, J. G., Boukes, M., Vliegenthart, R., & Verhoeven, P. (2020). Buffering negative news: Individual-level effects of company visibility, tone, and pre-existing attitudes on corporate reputation. Mass Communication and Society, 23(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1694155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessel, M. (2014). Restoring the pharmaceutical industry’s reputation. Nature Biotechnology, 32(10), 983–990. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koolma, H. M. (2011). The rise and fall of credibility. Paper presented at the NIG Working Conference, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Muis, J. (2009). The rise of right-wing populist Pim Fortuyn in the Netherlands: A discursive opportunity approach. European Journal of Political Research, 48(5), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00846.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoma-Aho, V. (2007). Neutral reputation and public sector organizations. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550043
   Google Scholar
• Luoma-Aho, V., Olkkonen, L., & Lähteenmäki, M. (2013). Expectation management for public sector organizations. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 248–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E. (2014). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused?. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 285–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (2014). Contextual distortion: Strategic communication versus the networked nature of nearly everything. In D. Holtzhausen, & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 137–150). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, S., & Pirner, P. (2006). Measuring and monitoring stakeholder relationships: Using TRI* M as an innovative tool for corporate communication. In Customising stakeholder management strategies (pp. 89–100). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Omroep Brabant. (2014). Belgenbloed kopen zou Amphia ziekenhuis Breda miljoen euro per jaar besparen [Bying Belgian blood would save a million euros a year for Amphia hospital Breda]. https://www.omroepbrabant.nl/nieuws/1860001/belgenbloed-kopen-zou-amphia-ziekenhuis-breda-miljoen-euro-per-jaar-besparen
   Google Scholar
• Overton-de Klerk, N., & Verwey, S. (2013). Towards an emerging paradigm of strategic communication: Core driving forces. Communicatio, 39(3), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2013.837626
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, K. N., Gioia, D. A., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Reconciling scattered images: Managing disparate organizational expressions and impressions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(3), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492608314991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remmers, F. (2012). Hoogleraar zet vraagtekens bij voortdurende prijsstijgingen [Professor questions continuous price raises]. Brabants Dagblad.
   Google Scholar
• Rengers, M., & De Vrieze, J. (2014, 2014, November 14). Verovering van Amerika is bloedstollend voor Sanquin. [Conquering America is blood-curdling for Sanquin] . De Volkskrant.
   Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P. (1997). Part VII: Managing reputation: Pursuing everyday excellence: The image cascade and the formation of corporate reputations. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(2), 188–194.
   Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2006). Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Amr, 31(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379624
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, M., Hatch, M. J., & Holten Larsen, M. (2009). The expressive organization linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand. Oxford University Press, http://www.myilibrary.com?id=81949;
   Google Scholar
• Sillince, J. A., & Brown, A. D. (2009). Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites. Human Relations, 62(12), 1829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709336626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, 133, 155.
   Google Scholar
• Soderlund, M. (2007). The role of news media in shaping and transforming the public perception of Mexican immigration and the laws involved. Law & Psychol.Rev, 31, 167.
   Google Scholar
• Sondervan, E. (2008). The TRI* M principle-applying it in the public sector. In M. Huber, & S. O’Gorman (Eds.), From customer retention to a holistic stakeholder management system (pp. 31–49). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Littleton, K. (2008). Artwork or money: Conflicts in the construction of a creative identity. Sociological Review, 56(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNS NIPO. (2014). Sanquin op koers voor 2016? Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• True Research. (2014). Onderzoek mogelijke positionering Sanquin. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Vaessen, T. (2018a). Alarmfase 1 bij farmaconcern van Sanquin: De FDA komt langs. [Level 1 alert at Sanquin’s pharma: The FDA comes over]. Financieele Dagblad.
   Google Scholar
• Vaessen, T. (2018b). Monopolie sanquin roept opnieuw vragen op. [Sanquin’s monopoly raises questions again]. Financieele Dagblad.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Bogaerd, M., & Aerts, W. (2015). Does media reputation affect properties of accounts payable? European Management Journal, 33(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mersbergen, S. (2011). Top van Sanquin krijgt meer. [Sanquin’s top gets more]. Stentor.
   Google Scholar
• Veenhof, H. (2009). Geven is nuttig, mar de lol is er af. [Donating is useful, but no fun any longer]. Nederlands Dagblad.
   Google Scholar
• Volkskrant, D. (2008). Het rode goud. [The red gold]. Volkskrant.
   Google Scholar
• Wæraas, A. (2008). Can public sector organizations be coherent corporate brands? Marketing Theory, 8(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593108093325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæraas, A., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2012). Public sector organizations and reputation management: Five problems. International Public Management Journal, 15(2), 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2012.702590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, A., & Bentley, J. (2017). A balance theory approach to stakeholder network and apology strategy. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19(3), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013497081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2003). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (3rd). McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Retrieved from Table of contents. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/mh021/2002025544.html;
   Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485
   Google Scholar