The Fluid and Disruptive Shape of Activism: Strategic Communication in #fridaysforfuture

References

• Adi, A. (2018). Protest public relations: Communicating dissent and activism – an introduction. In A. Adi (Ed.), Protest public relations (pp. 1–11). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351173605
   Google Scholar
• Adi, A., & Moloney, K. (2012). The importance of scale in Occupy movement protests: A case study of a local Occupy protest as a tool of communication through public relations and social media/La importancia de la magnitud de las protestas del movimiento Occupy: el caso de una protesta. Revista Internacional De Relaciones Públicas, 2(4(jul–dic), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.5783/revrrpp.v2i4(jul-dic).105
   Google Scholar
• Ali, H. M., Saniei, S., O’Leary, P., & Boddy, J. (2022). Activist public relations in developing contexts where rules and norms collide: Insights from two activist organizations against gender-based violence in Bangladesh. Journal of Communication Management, 26(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-09-2021-0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, M. T., Mercea, D., & Charpentier, A. (2015). Tents, tweets, and events: The interplay between ongoing protests and social media. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 320–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.com.12145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belinskaya, Y. (2021). The ghosts Navalny met: Russian YouTube-sphere in check. Journalism and Media, 2(4), 674–696. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2040040
   Google Scholar
• Brantner, C., & Rodríguez-Amat, J. R. (2016). New “danger zone” in Europe: Representations of place in social media–supported protests. International Journal of Communication, 10(22), 299–320. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3788
   Google Scholar
• Brantner, C., Rodríguez-Amat, J. R., & Belinskaya, Y. (2021). Structures of the public sphere: Contested spaces as assembled interfaces. Media and Communication, 9(3), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i3.3932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N. Rambukkana (Ed.), Hashtag publics (pp. 13–28). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Candón-Mena, J. (2011). Internet en movimiento: nuevos movimientos sociales y nuevos medios en la sociedad de la información. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/12085/
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2000). La era de la información. La sociedad red (2nd.a ed.). Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2008). The new Public Sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A., & Chadwick. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701471666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2009). Movement societies and digital protest: Fan activism and other nonpolitical protest online. Sociological Theory, 27(3), 220–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferra, I., & Nguyen, D. (2017). #Migrantcrisis: «etiquetando» la crisis migratoria europea en Twitter. Journal of Communication Management, 21(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-02-2017-0026
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, R. M., & Everson, D. W. (2016). Mechanisms of social movement success: Conversation, displacement and disruption. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 74(4), e045. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.4.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzke, A. S., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C., & the Association of Internet Researchers. (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1996). Multiculturalism and gender equity: The US “difference” debates revisited. Constellations, 3(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.1996.tb00043.x
   Google Scholar
• Fridays For Future. (n.d.). Social media. Social movement feed. https://fridaysforfuture.org/take-action/social-media/.
   Google Scholar
• Garnham, N. (2007). Habermas and the public sphere. Global Media and Communication, 3(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766507078417
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, R. S. (2009). Does Habermas understand the Internet? The algorithmic construction of the blogo/public sphere. Gnovis: A Journal of Communication, Culture, and Technology, 10(1), 1–29. http://stuartgeiger.com/papers/gnovis-habermas-blogopublic-sphere.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Rubí, A. (2021). Artivismo: el poder de los lenguajes artísticos para la comunicación política y el activismo. Editorial UOC.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 3(3), 4–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/487737
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244
   Google Scholar
• Haßler, J., Wurst, A. K., Jungblut, M., & Schlosser, K. (2021). Influence of the pandemic lockdown on Fridays for Future’s hashtag activism. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211026575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haw, A. L. H. (2020). What drives political news engagement in digital spaces? Reimagining ‘echo chambers’ in a polarised and hybridised media ecology. Communication Research and Practice, 6(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2020.1732002/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide, M., von Platen, S., Simonsson, C., & Falkheimer, J. (2018). Expanding the scope of strategic communication: Towards a holistic understanding of organizational complexity. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1456434
   Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I., Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., & Espina, C. (2017). Classifying Twitter topic-networks using social network analysis. Social Media + Society, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R. (2008). Strategic communication. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 48–55). Wiley‐Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Strategic communication: Opportunities and challenges of the research area. In D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 3–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. N. (1999). Race, media and civil society. International Sociology, 14(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014003008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, S. (2019). Movement mobilization in the age of hashtag activism: Examining the challenge of noise, hate, and disengagement in the # MeToo campaign. Policy & Internet, 11(4), 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luengo, G. (2010). Crisis analógica, futuro digital. Proceedings IV Congreso Online del Observatorio para la Cibersociedad, pp. 12–29, Nov. 2009, Cornellá, España. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=429442
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, T., Rosati, P., & Nair, B. (2020). Calculated vs. ad hoc publics in the #Brexit discourse on Twitter and the role of business actors. Information, 11(9), 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11090435
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, J. (2020). Fridays for Future’s disruptive potential: An inconvenient youth between moderate and radical ideas. Frontiers in Communication, 5(48). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00048
   Google Scholar
• McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication, 10(1–2). http://www.cios.org/getfile/MCPHEE_V10N1200
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, K., McQueen, D., Surowiec, P., & Yaxley, H. (2013). Dissent and protest public relations. Public Relations Research Group (The Media School, Bournemouth University). https://research.bournemouth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Dissent-and-public-relations-Bournemouth-University.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Negt, O., & Kluge, A. (1973). Öffentlichkeit und Erfahrung: Zur Organisationsanalyse von bürgerlicher und proletarischer Öffentlichkeit [Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere]. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E. (2019). The instigatory theory of NGO communication: Strategic communication in civil society organisations. Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla Molina, A. (2020). twitter_full_archive_DB/[Software]. Available at: https://github.com/AdriaPadilla/Twitter-API-V2-full-archive-Search-academics/tree/main/twitter_full_archive_DB Retrieved online October , 2021
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L., & Nicotera, A. M.(Eds.). (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robles, C. S., & Zambrano, R. E. (2011). Relaciones públicas 2.0 (y Educomunicación) ¿De qué hablamos realmente? Un acercamiento conceptual y estratégico. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 3, 72–96. https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/2172-9077/article/view/11919
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz Ruiz, J. (2009). Sociological discourse analysis: Methods and logic. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.2.1298
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. G., Krishna, A., & Al-Sinan, R. (2019). Beyond slacktivism: Examining the entanglement between social media engagement, empowerment, and participation in activism. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(3), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1621870
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, C. (2001). The Internet and the global public sphere. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tas, T., & Tas, O. (2014). Resistance on the walls, reclaiming public space: Street art in times of political turmoil in Turkey. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 5(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.5.3.327_1
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., & Wyatt, S. (1999). Shaping cyberspace: Interpreting and transforming the Internet. Research Policy, 28(7), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00016-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2016). The dark side of digital politics: Understanding the algorithmic manufacturing of consent and the hindering of online dissidence. IDS bulletin, 41(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugarte, D. (2007). El poder de las redes. Manual para personas, colectivos y empresas abocadas al ciberperiodismo. Ediciones El Cobre. http://www.pensamientocritico.org/davuga0313.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruler, B. (2018). Communication theory: An underrated pillar on which strategic communication rests. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452240
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, M., Kocyba, P., de Vydt, M., de Moor, J., Adman, P., Balsiger, P., & Zamponi, L. (2019). Fridays for Future: Surveys of climate protests on 15 March 2019 in 13 European cities. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/xcnzh/
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1999). On toleration. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, P., & Etter, M. (2018). Strategic communication and emergence: A dual narrative framework. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452241
   Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485
   Google Scholar
• Zulli, D. (2020). Evaluating hashtag activism: Examining the theoretical challenges and opportunities of# BlackLivesMatter. Participations, 17(1), 197–215. https://participations.org/Volume%2017/Issue%201/12.pdf
   Google Scholar