8,887
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

When door holding harms: gender and the consequences of non-normative help

&
Pages 1-10 | Received 05 Sep 2013, Accepted 20 Nov 2013, Published online: 19 Dec 2013

References

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Brehm, J. W., & Cole, A. H. (1966). Effect of a favor which reduces freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 420–426.
  • Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • El-Alayli, A., & Messe, L. A. (2004). Reactions toward an unexpected or counternormative favor-giver: Does it matter if we think we can reciprocate?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 633–641.
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1, 117–140.
  • Fisher, J. D., & Nadler, A. (1974). Effect of similarity between donor and recipient on recipient's reactions to aid. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 230–243.
  • Fisher, J. D., Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychology Bulletin, 91, 27–54.
  • Goldman, M., Florez, C., & Fuller, G. L. (1981). Factors affecting courteous behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 169–174.
  • Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–500.
  • Morse, S. J. (1972). Help, likeability, and social influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 34–46.
  • Morse, S. J., & Gergen, K. J. (1971). Material aid and social attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 150–162.
  • Nadler, A. (1987). Determinants of help seeking behaviour: The effects of helper's similarity, task centrality and recipient's self esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 57–67.
  • Nadler, A., & Fisher, J. D. (1986). The role of threat to self-esteem and perceived control in recipient reaction to help: Theory development and empirical validation. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 81–121). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Parker, S. (1988). Rituals of gender: A study of etiquette, public symbols, and cognition. American Anthropologist, 90, 372–384.
  • Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere-specific measures of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1253–1265.
  • Paulhus, D. L., & Van Selst, M. (1990). The spheres of control scale: 10 years of research. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1029–1036.
  • Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.
  • Renne, K. S., & Allen, P. C. (1976). Gender and the ritual of the door. Sex Roles, 2, 167–174.
  • Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tessler, R. C., & Schwartz, S. H. (1972). Help seeking, self-esteem, and achievement motivation: An attributional analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 318–326.
  • Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1994). Affirmative action as help: A review of recipient reactions to preferential selection and affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 43–69.
  • Ventimiglia, J. C. (1982). Sex roles and chivalry: Some conditions of gratitude to altruism. Sex Roles, 8, 1107–1122.
  • Walum, L. R. (1974). The changing door ceremony: Notes on the operation of sex roles in everyday life. Urban Life and Culture, 2, 506–515.
  • Wesselmann, E. D., Cardoso, F. D., Slater, S., & Williams, K. D. (2012). To be looked at as through air: Civil attention matters. Psychological Science, 23, 166–168.
  • Yoder, J. D., Hogue, M., Newman, R., Metz, L., & LaVigne, T. (2002). Exploring moderators of gender differences: Contextual differences in door-holding behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1682–1686.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.