Wanna play? The role of self-construal when using gadgets to cope with ostracism

References

• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., & Hugenberg, K. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352–362. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does exclusion hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26, 143–155. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. L., Knowles, M. L., Jefferis, V., Never alone: The interdependent self as a buffer of social exclusion. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Knowles, M. (2005). Social snacking and shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227–241). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, J., & Wheeler, L. (2009). On being rejected: A meta-analysis of experimental research on rejection. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 468–488. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01158.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruter, M., & Masters, R. D. (1986). Ostracism as a social and biological phenomenon: An introduction. Ethnology and Sociobiology, 7, 149–158. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(86)90043-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartgerink, C., van Beest, C., Wicherts, J., & Williams, K. D. (2015). Manuscript submitted for publication. Ordinal effects of ostracism: A meta-analysis of Cyberball studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766–794. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture's consequences. International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, R. W., Roeder, U. -R., van Baaren, R. B., Brandt, A. C., & Hannover, B. (2004). Don't stand so close to me: the effects of self-construal on interpersonal closeness. Psychological Science, 15, 237–242. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00658.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, E., Graupmann, V., Kayser, D. N., Zanna, M., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Frey, D. (2009). Culture, self, and the emergence of reactance: Is there a ”universal freedom? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1068–1080. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagitcibasi, C. (1987). Individual and group loyalties: Are they compatible. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 94–103). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M., Liu, C., & Sassaman, M. (2015). Meet my friend, chlorophyllis: Evidence that houseplants can serve as social surrogates. In Poster presented at the 16th Annual Convention of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Long Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: on the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1239–1252. doi:10.1037/a0024506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D. (1993). The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 993–1009. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfundmair, M., Graupmann, V., Frey, D., & Aydin, N. (2015). The different behavioral intentions of collectivists and individualists in response to social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 363–378. doi:10.1177/0146167214566186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöhlmann, C., Carranza, E., Hannover, B., & Iyengar, S. S. (2007). Repercussions of self-construal for self-relevant and other-relevant choice. Social Cognition, 25, 284–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, D., Wesselmann, E. D., & Williams, K. D. (2013). Interdependent self-construal moderates coping with (but not the initial pain of) ostracism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 320–326. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275. doi:10.1177/106939719502900302.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troisi, J. D., & Gabriel, S. (2011). Chicken soup really is good for the soul: "comfort food" fulfills the need to belong. Psychological Science, 22, 747–753. doi:10.1177/0956797611407931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenti, J., Gabriel, S., & Young, A. (2012). MayPoster presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL. Enrolling at Hogwarts: Social surrogate use and the collective self.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselmann, E. D., Ren, D., Swim, E., & Williams, K. D. (2013). Rumination hinders recovery from ostracism. International Journal of Developmental Science, 7, 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 279–314). NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 174–180. doi:10.3758/BF03192765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar