Communicating highly divergent levels of scientific and social consensus: its effects on people’s scientific beliefs

References

• Akter, S., Bennett, J., & Ward, M. B. (2012). Climate change scepticism and public support for mitigation: Evidence from an Australian choice experiment. Global Environmental Change, 22, 736–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific Americans, 193, 31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benegal, S. D., & Scruggs, L. A. (2018). Correcting misinformation about climate change: The impact of partisanship in an experimental setting. Climate Change, 148, 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, S., Proust, J., & Clément, F. (2015). Four- to six-year-old children’s sensitivity to reliability versus consensus in the endorsement of object labels. Child Development, 86, 1112–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. M., Geryk, L. L., Chen, A. T., Nagler, R. H., Dieckmann, N. F., & Han, P. K. J. (2016). Conflicting health information: A critical research need. Health Expectations, 19, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. E. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2016). Rational irrationality: Modeling climate change belief polarization using Bayesian networks. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 160–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE, 12, e0175799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo, P. R., Reitan, H. T., & Shaw, M. E. (1968). Conformity as a function of experimentally induced minority and majority competence. Psychonomic Science, 10, 329–330.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Biotechnology Information Japan. (2016). Idenshi-kumikae-shyokuhin (baiteku) ni taisuru shouhisya no ishiki-chousa: 2015 nendo chousa-kekka [Consumers’ attitudes toward genetically modified foods: Results of 2015 survey]. Retrieved from http://www.cbijapan.com/material/dl/report/20160527/CBIJ_GM_Consumer_Survery_Presentation_160524.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D. (1970). Effects of sex, response order, and expertise in conformity: A dispositional approach. Sociometry, 33, 239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon, G. (2016). Applying the gateway belief model to genetically modified food perceptions: New insights and additional questions. Journal of Communication, 66, 888–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einav, S. (2014). Does the majority always know best? Young children’s flexible trust in majority opinion. PLoS ONE, 9, e104585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Dupree, C. (2014). Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 13593–13597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Meredith.
   Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Paterson, K. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer?. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 539–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, K., Barclay, J., & Pidgeon, N. (2008). Whose reality counts? Factors affecting the perception of volcanic risk. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 172, 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2015). Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Advances in Political Psychology, 36(Suppl.), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., LaVail, K., Nowak, G., Basket, M., & Landry, S. (2011). Confidence about vaccines in the United States: Understanding parents’ perceptions. Health Affairs, 30, 1151–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2018). Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety. PLoS ONE, 13, e0200295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klucharev, V., Hytönen, K., Rijpkema, M., Smidts, A., & Fernández, G. (2009). Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron, 61, 140–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2018). The impact of perceived scientific and social consensus on scientific beliefs. Science Communication, 40, 63–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J. T., & Hallman, W. K. (2005). Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Risk Analysis, 25, 1241–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2013). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3, 334–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, T. A., Maibach, E., Peters, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: The results of two experiments. PLoS ONE, 10, e0120985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, K. (2005, March 2). Idenshi-kumikae-syokubutsu no syakai ni okeru tekisetsuna jyuyou wo susumeru taisei wo motomu [Proposals for setting up a system to seek social acceptance of genetically modified crops]. Retrieved from https://jspp.org/society/intro/proposal/teigen2005.html
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2015). Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/
   Google Scholar
• Puhl, R. M., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2005). Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: A new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychology, 24, 517–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., & Jost, J. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2019). The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1, 1600008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 10, e0118489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar