Ethical defaults: which transparency components can increase the effectiveness of default nudges?

References

• Allcott, H., & Mullainathan, S. (2010). Behavior and energy policy. Science, 327(5970), 1204–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, A., Essegaier, S., & Kohli, R. (2000). Internet recommendation systems. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, L. (1978). Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: A field study of residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 428–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, J., & Hendricks, B. (1997). Effects of interpersonal touch, degree of justification, and sex of participant on compliance with a request. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(4), 460–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, L. (2009). The Ethics of Nudge. In T. Grüne-Yanoff. & S. O. Hansson (Eds.), Preference Change (pp. 207–219). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, H., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Klement, K., Jonsson, M. L., & Rahali, B. (2018). Can nudges be transparent and yet effective? Journal of Economic Psychology, 65, 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2016). Pre-suasion: A revolutionary way to influence and persuade. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R., & Goldstein, N. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology., 55, 591–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crano, W., & Prislin, R. (Eds.). (2008). Frontiers of social psychology. Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. (2006). Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication–A generalized solution. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 10(2), 2–34.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Buchner, A, & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using g*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsen, G., Castelo, N., & Reiner, P. (2013). Decisional enhancement and autonomy: Public attitudes to-wards overt and covert nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M, & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal Of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. doi:10.1086/jcr.1994.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N., Martin, S., & Cialdini, R. (2008). Yes!: 50 scientifically proven ways to be persuasive. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P., & Jespersen, A. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behavior change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1), 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C., Janis, I., & Kelley, H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., & Mellers, A. (2016). American attitudes toward nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney, A., Richards, C., Vernon, S., & Vogel, V. (1998). The effect of physician recommendation on enrollment in the breast cancer chemoprevention trial. Preventive Medicine, 27(5), 713–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. (2009). Taking the target’s perspective: The persuasion knowledge model. In M. Wänke (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 297–316). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krijnen, J, Tannenbaum, D, & Fox, C. (2017). Choice architecture 2.0: behavioral policy as an implicit social interaction. Behavioral Science & Policy, 3(2), i-18. doi:10.1353/bsp.2017.0010
   Google Scholar
• Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of” placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(6), 635–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Rosenzweig, C. (2015). The relationship between motivation, monetary compensation, and data quality among US-and India-based workers on mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 519–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D., & Rajpal, S. (2015). Warning: You are about to be nudged. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(1), 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Marteau, M., Ogilvie, D., Roland, M., Suhrcke, M., & Kelly, M. (2011). Judging nudging: Can nudging improve population health? BMJ, 342, d228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C., Liersch, M., & Finkelstein, S. (2006). Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psychological Science, 17(5), 414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. (1997). Standpoint explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of varying conclusion articulation in persuasive messages. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, G. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunov, Y., Wänke, M., & Vogel, T. (2018). Transparency effects on policy compliance: Disclosing how defaults work can enhance their effectiveness. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, E., & Cacioppo, T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915–1926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler, M. (2015). The role of informational uncertainty in the decision to strategically default. Journal of Housing Economics, 27(3), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. (2006). Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition, 101(3), 467–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Goldstein, D., & Johnson, E. (2013). Choice without awareness: Ethical and policy implications of defaults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(2), 159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffel, M., Williams, F., & Pogacar, R. (2016). Ethically deployed defaults: Transparency and consumer protection through disclosure and preference articulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 865–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2015). The ethics of nudging. Yale Journal on Regulation, 32(2), 413–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), 164–S187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Pligt, J., & Vliek, M. (2016). The psychology of influence: Theory, research and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, T., & Wänke, M. (2016). Attitudes and attitude change. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Quinn, J. (2003). Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analysis syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar