Political identity moderates the effect of watchful eyes on voter mobilization: A reply to Matland and Murray (2019)

References

• Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567 (7748), 305–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, A., Lawrence, C., & Ferguson, E. (2018). Does observability affect prosociality? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1875), 20180116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, T. C., & Hare, B. (2007). Engineering human cooperation: Does involuntary neural activation increase public good contributions? Human Nature, 18, 88–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear, K, Dutton, K, & Fox, E. (2019). Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? a systematic review & meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(3), 269-280. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D., & Bateson, M. (2011). Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: A field experiment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 172–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field experiments: design, analysis and interpretation. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102, 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., & Kern, H. L. (2012). Modeling heterogeneous treatment effects in survey experiments with Bayesian additive regression tress. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 491–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., & Ratkovic, M. (2013). Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation. Annals of Applied Statistics, 7(1), 443–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., & Strauss, A. (2011). Estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects from randomized experiments, with application to the optimal planning of the get-out-the-vote campaign. Political Analysis, 19, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Hardin, C. D. (2018). Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 77–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsey, C., Vaish, A., & Grossmann, T. (2018). Eyes, more than other facial features, enhance real-world donation behavior. Human Nature, 29(4), 390–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manesi, Z., van Lange, P., & Pollet, T. (2016). Eyes wide open: Only eyes that pay attention promote prosocial behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E., & Murray, G. R. (2019). A second look at partisanship’s effect on receptivity to social pressure to vote. Social Influence, 14, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShane, B. B., Tackett, J. L., Bockenholt, U., & Gelman, A. (2018). Large scale replication projects in contemporary psychological research. The American Statistician, 73, 99–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, G. (2019). Watching eyes and partisan mobilization: A rejoinder to panagopoulos and van der Linden. Social Influence. doi: 10.1080/15534510.2019.1696224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northover, S. B., Pedersen, W. C., Cohen, A. B., & Andrews, P. W. (2017). Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: Two meta-analyses. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), 144–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, C. (2014a). Watchful eyes: Implicit observability cues and voting. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(4), 279–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, C. (2014b). I’ve got my eyes on you: Implicit social‐pressure cues and prosocial behavior. Political Psychology, 35(1), 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, C., & van der Linden, S. (2016). Conformity to implicit social pressure: The role of political identity. Social Influence, 11(3), 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, C., & van der Linden, S. (2017). The feeling of being watched: Do eye cues elicit negative affect? North American Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 113.
   Google Scholar
• Weinschenk, A. C., Panagopoulos, C., Drabot, K., & van der Linden, S. (2018). Gender and social conformity: Do men and women respond differently to social pressure to vote? Social Influence, 13(2), 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar