Right-wing authoritarianism, conspiracy mentality, and susceptibility to distorted alternative news

References

• Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of Freedom. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Alwin, D. F. (1997). Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales. Which are better? Sociological Methods and Research, 25(3), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124197025003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, F. (2013).Dose-dependent media priming effects of stereotypic newspaper articles on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Communication, 63(5). 830–851. DOI:10.1111/jcom.12056
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, F., Haim, M., & Beck, J. (2019). Fake News, Warnhinweise und perzipierter Wahrheitsgehalt: Zur unterschiedlichen Anfälligkeit für Falschmeldungen in Abhängigkeit von der politischen Orientierung. [ Fake news, warnings and perceptual truth: On the differential sucseptibility for fake news depending on recipients’ political orientations]. Publizistik, 64(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10/gfw6gt
   Google Scholar
• Bader, K., Jansen, C., & Rinsdorf, L. (2020). Jenseits der Fakten: Deutschsprachige Fake News aus Sicht der Journalistik [Beyond facts: Journalist perspectives on fake news in German language]. In M. Steinebach, K. Bader, L. Rinsdorf, N. Krämer, & A. Roßnagel Eds., Desinformationen aufdecken und bekämpfen. Interdisziplinäre Ansätze gegen Desinformationskampagnen und für Meinungspluralität [Detecting and combating disinformation: Interdisciplinary appraoches against disinformation campaigns and fort he plurality of opinions]. (Vol. 45, pp. 33–76). Nomos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748904816
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021226224601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierlein, C., Asbrock, F., Kauff, M., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Die Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA-3). [ The short-scale authoritarianism (KSA-3]. GESIS- Working Papers, 35. Gesis. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11753
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R. (1993). Uncertainty and social interaction. Annals of the International Communication Association, 16(1), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1993.11678865
   Google Scholar
• Boberg, S., Quandt, T., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Frischlich, L. (2020). Pandemic populism: Facebook pages of alternative news media and the corona crisis—A computational content analysis. ArXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.02566
   Google Scholar
• Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(April), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell, M. J. (2006). Appendix 3: Bootstrapping and variance robust standard errors. In Statistics at square two (pp. 109–116). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755839.app3
   Google Scholar
• Cohrs, J. C., & Asbrock, F. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 289(April2008), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.545
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H., & Semetko, H. A. (2004). News matters: Influences on the vote in the Danish 2000 Euro referendum campaign. European Journal of Political Research, 43(5), 699–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00171.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, W. (1990). Uncertainty, information-seeking, and liking during initial interaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication: WJSC, 54(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319009374325
   Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2015). Authoritarian Personality. In J. D. Wright (Ed.). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd, pp. 255–261). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24042-7
   Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faragó, L., Kende, A., & Krekó, P. (2020). We only believe in news that we doctored ourselves: The connection between partisanship and political fake news. Social Psychology, 51(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., Winter, S., & Metzger, M. J. (2020). Making sense of credibility in complex information environments: The role of message sidedness, information source, and thinking styles in credibility evaluation online. Information, Communication & Society, 23(7), 1038–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1547411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischlich, L., Klapproth, J., & Brinkschulte, F. (2020). Between mainstream and alternative – Co-orientation in right- wing populist alternative news media. In C. Grimme, M. Preuß, F. W. Takes, & A. Waldherr (Eds.), Disinformation in open online media (pp. 150–167). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_12
   Google Scholar
• Frischlich, L., Rieger, D., Hein, M., & Bente, G. (2015). Dying the right-way? Interest in and perceived persuasiveness of parochial extremist propaganda increases after mortality salience. Frontiers in Psychology: : Evolutionary Psychology and Neuroscience, 6(1222),  1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01222
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, M. (2003). Rechtsextremismus von Jugendlichen: Zur Erklärungskraft verschiedener theoretischer Konzepte [ Right-wing extremism of young adults: Explanative power of different theoretical concepts]. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 55(4), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-003-0116-3
   Google Scholar
• Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 U.S. election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(March). 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833–x
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, R., Beck, P. A., & Nisbet, E. C. (2018). “Fake news” and the defection of 2012 Obama voters in the 2016 presidential election. Electoral Studies, 61(October), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S., Katz, J., & Miranda, J. P. (2019). From belief in conspiracy theories to trust in others: Which factors influence exposure, believing and sharing fake news. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social computing and social media. Design, human behavior and analytics (Vol. 11578, pp. 217–232). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21902-4_16
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A. (1998). Message variables that mediate and moderate the effect of equivocal language on source credibility. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(1), 109–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X980171006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, A., Mayerhöffer, E., Reinhardt, S., & Knüpfer, C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right‐wing digital news infrastructures in six Western democracies. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrich, C. K. (2017, May 10). “Ich weiß nicht, ob sie das verstehen“ [ “I don’t know, wether you understand this”]. Welt Online. https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article164440546/Ich-weiss-nicht-ob-sie-das-verstehen.html
   Google Scholar
• Holt, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key-dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, 5(1), 221–233. https://projecteuclid.org/ebooks/berkeley-symposium-on-mathematical-statistics-and-probability/ProceedingsoftheFifthBerkeleySymposiumonMathematicalStatisticsandProbabilityVolume1:Statistics/chapter/Thebehaviorofmaximumlikelihoodestimatesundernonstandardconditions/bsmsp/1200512988
   Google Scholar
• Humprecht, E. (2019). Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: A comparison across four Western democracies. Information Communication and Society, 22(13), 1973–1988. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1474241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igartua, J. J., Moral-Toranzo, F., & Fernández, I. (2011). Cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional effects of news frame and group cues, on processing news about immigration. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(4), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., Lamberty, P., & Klein, O. (2018). Using power as a negative cue: How conspiracy mentality affects epistemic trust in sources of historical knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(9), 1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218768779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. O., & Fay, L. C. (1950). The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika, 15(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288864
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Van Der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Hardin, C. D. (2018). Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23(October), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Disinformation and the structural transformations of the public arena: Addressing the actual challenges to democracy. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2014). Mediation. http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm
   Google Scholar
• Knock, N., & Haday, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R. (1981). A note on studentizing a test for heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 17(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90062-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühl, S., & Vogel, D. (2017, May). Treffen mit Kirche und Diakonie [ Meeting with church and diaconia]. http://www.kirche-mv.de/Merkel-besucht-Stralsunder-Nachbarschaftszentrum-G.8518.0.html
   Google Scholar
• Lai, K. (2018). Estimating standardized SEM parameters given nonnormal data and incorrect model: Methods and comparison. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 600–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1392248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberty, P. K., Hellmann, J. H., & Oeberst, A. (2018). The winner knew it all? Conspiracy beliefs and hindsight perspective after the 2016 US general election. Personality and Individual Differences, 123(November), 236–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.033
   Google Scholar
• Landmann, H., Gaschler, R., & Rohmann, A. (2019). What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1401–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavine, H., Lodge, M., & Freitas, K. (2005). Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to information. Political Psychology, 26(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. (2013). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Post hoc identification of meaningless data in Internet surveys. Survey Research Methods, 13(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10/gf3gpq
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. A. (2020). Interactions (1.13) [R]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/interactions/interactions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mansel, J. (2006). Emotionale Verarbeitung der Interaktionen mit Zuwanderern und fremdenfeindliche Einstellungen [ Emotional processing of interactions with immigrants and xenophobic attitutes]. Soziale Probleme, 17(1), 90–114. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/24615
   Google Scholar
• Mattern, J. (2017). Integration braucht Begegnung und Geduld [Integration needs time and patience]. Ostsee Zeitung. http://www.ostsee-zeitung.de/Vorpommern/Ribnitz-Damgarten/Integration-braucht-Begegnung-und-Geduld
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2003). Operationalisierung von Vertrauen in Journalismus [ Operationalisation of trust in journalism]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2003-1-5
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Schmuck, D. (2017). The effects of anti-immigrant right-wing populist ads on implicit and explicit attitudes: A moderated mediation model. Communication Research, 44(4), 556–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215577859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Media Convergence and Social Media (Unit I.4)’. (2020, July 7). Tackling online disinformation. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/tackling-online-disinformation
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & Mccann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Annals of the International Communication Association, 27(1), 293–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029
   Google Scholar
• Mourão, R. R., & Robertson, C. T. (2019). Fake news as discursive integration: An analysis of sites that publish false, misleading, hyperpartisan and sensational information. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2077–2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1566871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10/gf6rsr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musil, C. M., Warner, C. B., Yobas, P. K., & Jones, S. L. (2002). Research techniques for handling missing data. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(7), 815. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394502762477004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Reuters institute digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619576
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., & Jost, J. T. (2020). The authoritarian-conservatism nexus. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34(April), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B. (2020). Facts and myths about misperceptions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2521–2526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlick, T. (2017, May). Merkel besichtigt Zuwanderer: “Gut Ding will Weile haben” [ Merkel inspects immigrants: “Haste makes waste”]. Compact Online. https://www.compact-online.de/merkel-besichtigt-zuwanderer-gut-ding-will-weile-haben/
   Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quandt, T., Frischlich, L., Boberg, S., & Schatto-Eckrodt, T. (2019). Fake news. In T. P. Vos, F. Hanusch, D. Dimitrakopolous, M. Geertsma-Sligh, & A. Sehl (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies, (pp. 1–6). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N. (2016). The consequences of reading inaccurate information. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416649347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger, D., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2013). Propaganda 2.0: Psychological effects of right-wing and Islamic extremist internet videos (Vol. 44). Wolters Kluwer Deutschland.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, D., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2017). Propaganda in an insecure, unstructured world: How psychological uncertainty and authoritarian attitudes shape the evaluation of right-wing extremist internet propaganda. Journal for Deradicalization, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rössler, P. (2011). Skalenhandbuch Kommunikationswissenschaft [ Scale handbook Communication Science]. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schenck-Hamlin, W. J., Procter, D. E., & Rumsey, D. J. (2000). The influence of negative advertising frames on political cynicism and politician accountability. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00749.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1982). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach (Revised ed.). Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starbird, K. (2017). Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 1–10. Montréal, Québéc, Canada: ICWSM.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, H. (2015). Lineare strukturgleichungsmodelle: Eine Einführung mit R [ Linear structural equation modelling: An introduction using R]. Rainer Hampp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stekhoven, D. J., & Buhlmann, P. (2012). MissForest—Non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics, 28(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielsch, M. T., & Hirschfeld, G. (2019). Facets of website content. Human-Computer Interaction, 34(4), 279–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1421954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabi Asr, F. (2019, August 16). One potential route to flagging fake news at scale: Linguistic analysis. Nieman Lab. https://www.niemanlab.org/2019/08/one-potential-route-to-flagging-fake-news-at-scale-linguistic-analysis/
   Google Scholar
• Ustadt Figenschou, T., & Ihlbaek, K. A. (2019). Challenging journalistic authority. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1–17. https://doi.org/10/gfj4cm
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2020). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), .23–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12681
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, S., Azevedo, F., & Jost, John T. (2021). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideologicalasymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42 (1). 23–51.https://doi.org/10.1111/pops. 12681
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618774270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, C. (2018). The need for smarter definitions and practical, timely empirical research on the information disorder. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1502047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiber, R., & Mühlhaus, D. (2014). Strukturgleichungsmodellierung [Stuctural-equation modeling]. Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2020). Modelr (0.1.8) [R]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=modelr.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, A. D., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9143-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeileis, A., Lumley, T., Graham, N., & Koell, S. (2020). Various versatile variances: An object-oriented implementation of clustered covariances in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 95(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v011.i10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zick, A., Küpper, B., & Berghan, W. (2019). Verlorene Mitte—Feindselige Zustände Rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland 2018/19 [ Lost center – hostile states. Right-wing extremism in Germany]. Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020). Mistrust, disinforming news, and vote choice: A panel survey on the origins and consequences of believing disinformation in the 2017 German parliamentary election. Political Communication, 37(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar