Quince Rootstocks Affect Some Vegetative and Generative Traits

Literature cited

• Abdollahi, H., D. Atashkar, and A. Alizadeh. 2012. Comparison of the effects of two hawthorn and quince rootstocks on several pear commercial cultivars. Iran. J. Hort 43:53–63. (In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, J.M., J. Gomez-Aparisi, J.M. Anson, M.T. Espiau, and M. Carrera. 2011. Evaluation of the OHxF selections as an alternative to quince rootstocks for pear: Agronomical performance of ‘Conference’ and‘Doyenne du Comice’. Acta Hort. 903: 451–456. Geneva, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, E.H., S. Cockfield, and G. Fazio. 2006. Biology and management of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), in Proc IOBC. Washington State. Lleida, Spain, University of Lleida, pp. 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Biranvand, N., M. Mostafavi, and A. Ershadi. 2011. Effect of seedling and MM106 rootstocks on quantitative and qualitative traits of red delicious and golden delicious apple cultivars. 7th Iranian Horticultural Science Congress, Isfahan, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, H.D., and P.E. Pratt. 1982. Methods of analysis for soil, plants and waters. Berkeley: University of California publication, No. 4034..
   Google Scholar
• De Salvador, F.R., M. Fisichella, and M. Fontanari. 2006. Correlations between fruit size and fruit quality in apple trees with high and standard crop load levels. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 14:113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Dodangeh, M.R., M.J. Shakouri, Z. Hamzehei, and A. Dadashpour. 2012. Effects of M9 and MM106 rootstocks on agro-morphological characteristics of ‘Golab kohanz’ and ‘Delbar estival’ apple cultivars in Abhar region of Iran. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 5:1844–1847.
   Google Scholar
• Donnini, S., A. Castagna, A. Ranieri, and G. Zocchi. 2009. Differential responses in pear and quince genotypes induced by Fe deficiency and bicarbonate. J. Plant Physiol. 166:1181–1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Plooy, P., G. Jacobs, and N.C. Cook. 2002. Quantification of bearing habit on the basis of lateral bud growth of seven pear cultivars grown under conditions of inadequate winter chilling in South Africa. Sci. Hort. 95:185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, R., R. Bell, and T. Einhorn. 2012. Needs assessment for future US pear rootstock research directions based on the current state of pear production and rootstock research. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 66:153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahi, E., M.W. Colt, B. Fallahi, and J.I. Chun. 2002. The importance of apple rootstocks on tree growth, yield, fruit quality, leaf nutrition and photosynthesis with an emphasis on ‘Fuji’. Hort. Technol. 12:38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazenda, P., R. Pereira, M. Fonseca, J. Carlier, and J. Leitao. 2019. Identification and validation of microsatellite markers in strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.). Turk. J. Agric. For 43:430–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francescatto, P., D. Pazzin, A. Gazolla Nero, J. Fachinello, and C. Giacobbo. 2014. Evaluation of graft compatibility between quince rootstocks and pear scions. Acta Hortic. 872:253–259.
   Google Scholar
• Galli, F., S. Ancarani, S. Serra, and S. Musacchi. 2011. Training systems and rootstocks for high density planting (HDP) of the cultivar ‘Abbe Fetel’: Developmental trials in Italy. Acta Hortic. 909:277–280.
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, A., J. Nasiri, and M. Yahyabadi. 2010. Study of the relative tolerance of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) rootstocks to different bicarbonate concentrations. Seed Plant Prod. J. 26:137–151. ( In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Hadavand, N., A. Ershadi, R. Karimi, A. Talaei, and M.A. Askari Sarcheshmeh. 2016. Effect of planting density on fruit quality and leaf elements concentration of apple on rootstock of M26. J. Crop Improv. 2:345–358.
   Google Scholar
• Halasz, J., A. Pedryc, S. Ercisli, K.U. Yilmaz, and A. Hegedus. 2010. S-genotyping supports the genetic relationships between Turkish and Hungarian apricot germplasm. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 135(5):410–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassani, G.H., H. Doulati Baneh, and H. Mahmoud Zadeh. 2012. Fruit yield efficiency and some vegetative characteristics of commercial and spur type apple cultivars. Plant Seed Prod. J. 3:373–376. ( In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Hrotko, K., and E. Rozpara. 2017. Rootstocks and improvement, p. 117–139. In: J. Quero-Garcia, A. Iezzoni, J. Pulawska, and G. Lang eds.. Cherries botany, production and uses. Boston, MA, USA: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias, I., and L. Asin. 2005. Performance of ‘Conference’ pear on self-rooted trees and several Old Home× Farmingdale, seedling and quince rootstocks in Spain. Acta Hortic. 671: 485–491. Stellenbosch, South Africa .
   Google Scholar
• Ikinci, A., I. Bolat, I. Ercisli, and O. Kodad. 2014. Influence of rootstocks on growth, yield, fruit quality and leaf mineral element contents of pear cv. ‘Santa Maria’ in Semi-arid Conditions. Biol. Res. 47:71.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E.J. 2003. Biology of apples and pears, p. 501. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B.J.J. 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC Press, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kviklys, D., M. Liaudanskas, J. Viskelis, L. Buskiene, J. Lanauskas, N. Nobertas Uselis, and V. Janulis. 2017. Composition and concentrations of phenolic compounds of ‘Auksis’ apple grown on various rootstocks. Proc. Latv. Acad. Sci. Sect. B. 71:144–149.
   Google Scholar
• Lepsis, J., L. Lepse, D. Kviklys, and N. Univer. 2013. Evaluation of pear rootstocks for the cultivar ‘Suvenirs’ in the Baltic region. Natural, Exact Appl. Sci 67:145–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mezey, J., and I. Lesko. 2014. Callus and root-system formation in cherry rootstock Gisela 5. Acta Hortic. 17:5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Milosevic, T., and N. Milosevic. 2015. Apple fruit quality, yield and leaf macro-nutrients content as affected by fertilizer treatment. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nut. 15:76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Milosevic, T., N. Milosevic, and J. Mladenovic. 2018. Role of apple clonal rootstocks on yield, fruit size, nutritional value and antioxidant activity of ‘Red Chief® Camspur’ cultivar. Sci. Hort. 236:214–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, S., B. Baninasab, A.H. Khoshgoftar Manesh, and A. Ghasemi. 2015. Responses to quince, pear and hawthorn rootstocks to iron deficiency in soilless culture. Sci. Technol. Greenhouse Crops. 20:127–137. ( in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Morandi, B., L. Manfrini, S. Lugli, A. Tugnoli, A. Boini, G.D. Perulli, K. Bresilla, M. Venturi, and L.C. Grappadelli. 2019. Sweet cherry water relations and fruit production efficiency are affected by rootstock vigor. J. Plant Physiol. 237:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, M., and N. Cook. 2008. Effect of six rootstocks on ‘Forelle’ pear tree growth, production, fruit quality and leaf mineral content. Acta Hortic. 772:97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Pirmoradian, M., L. Naseri, H. Abdollahi, and A.A. Shahabi. 2017. Ferric chelate reductase activity as screening index for selecting iron chlorosis resistance of Apple rootstocks. Iran. J. Hort. Sci. 48:655–668.
   Google Scholar
• Prado, R.M., and E. Alcantara. 2011. Tolerance to iron chlorosis in non-grafted quince seedlings and in pear grafted on to quince plants. J Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 11:119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reig, G., J. Lordan, G. Fazio, M.A. Grusak, S. Hoying, L. Cheng, P. Francescatto, and T. Robinson. 2018. Horticultural performance and elemental nutrient concentrations on ‘Fuji’ grafted on apple rootstocks under New York State climatic conditions. Sci. Hortic. 227:22–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, D.J., and J.B. Robinson. 1997. Plant analysis: An interpretation manual. 2nd ed. CSIRO Publics, Australia. Collingwood, VIC, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, T.L. 2004. Recent advances and future directions on orchard planting systems. Acta Hortic. 732:367–381.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Guisado, I., F. Hernandez, P. Melgarejo, P. Legua, R. Martinez, and J.J. Martinez. 2009. Chemical, morphological and organoleptical characterization of five Spanish quince tree clones (Cydonia oblonga Miller). Sci. Hortic. 122:491–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufato, L., B.D. Machado, A.A. Kretzschmar, A. Bogo, A.R. Luz, and J.L. Marcon Filho. 2014. Effect of high plant density on growth and production variables of european pear cultivars and quince rootstock combinations in southern Brazil. Acta Hortic. 1058:71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Senica, M., F. Stampar, and M. Mikulic-Petkovsek. 2019. Different extraction processes affect the metabolites in blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L. Subsp. Edulis) food products. Turk. J. Agric. For. 43:576–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotiropoulos, T.E. 2008. Performance of the apple (Malus domestica Borkh) cultivar imperial double red delicious grafted on five rootstocks. Hortic. Sci. 35:7–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tareen, J.M., Q.A. Tareen, A.J. Kamal, and B. Naseem. 2003. Influence of MM-106 and M-9 rootstocks on starking delicious apple. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 5:339–340.
   Google Scholar
• Tatari, M., A. Ghasemi, and M. Rezaei. 2016. Evaluation of vegetative and reproductive traits of some commercial pear cultivars on quince clonal rootstocks in Isfahan climatical conditions. Seed Plant Prod. 32:45–62. ( In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Tsipouridis, C., T. Thomidis, and K.E.A. Isaakidis. 2005. Effect of peach cultivars, rootstocks and Phytophthora on iron chlorosis. World J. Agric. Sci. 1:137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, H.B. 1964. Dwarfed fruit trees. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tworkoski, T., G. Fazio, and D.M. Glenn. 2016. Apple rootstock resistance to drought. Sci. Hortic. 204:70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tworkoski, T., and S. Miller. 2007. Rootstock effect on growth of apple scions with different growth habits. Sci. Hortic. 111:335–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, A.D., K.R. Tobutt, D.J. James, K.M. Evans, and F.A. Alson. 1997. Rootstock breeding and orchard testing at horticulture research international-East Malling. Acta Hortic. 451:83–88.
   Google Scholar