Is Local Office a Springboard for Women to Dáil Éireann?

REFERENCES

• Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Marsh. 2008. “The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 874–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Marsh. 2010. “Incumbent and Challenger Campaign Spending Effects in Proportional Electoral Systems: The Irish Elections of 2002.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (1): 159–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Gordon S. 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” American Political Science Review 66 (1): 144–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boneparth, Ellen. 1977. “Women in Campaigns: From Lickin’ and Stickin’ to Strategy.” American Politics Quarterly 5 (3): 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, Fiona. 2013. “Women and Politics in Ireland: The Road to Sex Quotas.” Irish Political Studies 28 (3): 341–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, Fiona, and Claire McGing. 2011. “Women and the Election.” In How Ireland Voted 2011: The Full Story of Ireland’s Earthquake Election, eds. Michael Gallagher and Michael Marsh. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 222–39.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, Fiona, Mack Mariani, and Timothy J. White. 2014, “Will Legislative Ggender Quotas Increase Female Representation in Ireland? A Feminist Institutionalism Analysis.” Representation 50 (4): 471–84.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 1997. “The Public Consequences of Private Inequality: Family Life and Citizen Participation.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 373–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, Barbara. 2005. “Campaign Financing: Women’s Experience in the Modern Era.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future. 2nd ed. eds. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistics Office (CSO). 2012. Women and Men in Ireland 2011. http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/otherreleases/2011/Women%20and%20Men%20in%20Ireland%202011.pdf (February 27, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Christine, and Margit Tavits. 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 460–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhibber, Pradeep. 2003. “Why Are Some Women Politically Active? The Household, Public Space, and Political Participation in India.” In Islam, Gender, Culture, and Democracy, ed. Ronald Inglehart. Willowdale, ON: de Sitter Publications, 186–206.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Stephen. 2007. Nealon’s Guide to the 30^th Dáil and 23^rd Seanad. Dublin: Irish Times and Gill & Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Stephen. 2011. Nealon’s Guide to the 31^st Dáil and 24^th Seanad. Dublin: Irish Times and Gill & Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, Linda. 2006. “The Consequences and Outcomes of Second-Wave Feminism in Ireland.” In Social Movements and Ireland, eds. Linda Connolly and Niamh Hourigan. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 58–85.
   Google Scholar
• Constantini, Edmond. 1990. “Political Women and Political Ambition: Closing the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 741–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, Richard L. 1987. “District Magnitudes and the Election of Women to the Dáil.” Electoral Studies 6 (2): 123–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, David M., Malcolm Mackerras, and Ian McAllister. 1996. “Designing Electoral Institutions: STV Systems and Their Consequences.” Political Studies 44 (1): 24–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fianna Fáil. 2004. Independent Gender Equality Audit and Fianna Fáil Gender Equality Action Plan 2004–2014. http://www.qub.ac.uk/cawp/research/FiannaFailreport.pdf (August 30, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, Garret. 2003. Reflections on the Irish State. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Linda L., and Robert D. McClure. 1989. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2010. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women’s Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2014. “Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 499–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., Jennifer L. Lawless, and Courtney Feeley. 2001. “Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (3): 411–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. 1980. “Candidate Selection in Ireland: The Impact of Localism and the Electoral System.” British Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 489–503.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. 1985. “Social Backgrounds and Local Orientations of Members of the Irish Dáil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (3): 373–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. 2009. Irish Elections 1948–77: Results and Analysis. London: Routledge and PSAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael, and Michael Marsh. 2011. How Ireland Voted 2011: The Full Story of Ireland’s Earthquake Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, Yvonne. 1998. Women and Politics in Contemporary Ireland. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, Yvonne. 2005. “Women in Politics.” In Politics in the Republic of Ireland. 4th ed., eds. John Coakley and Michael Gallagher. London: PSAI Press/Routledge, 272–302.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, Yvonne. 2008. “STV: A Gender-Proportional System?” In Women and Legislative Representation, ed. Manon Tremblay. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 149–60.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, Yvonne. 2010. “Women in Politics.” In Politics in the Republic of Ireland. 5th ed. eds. John Coakley and Michael Gallagher. London: Routledge, 263–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, Robert E. 2007. “The Effects of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (5): 1092–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Melanie M., and Pamela Paxton. 2008. “Continuous Change, Episodes, and Critical Periods: A Framework for Understanding Women’s Political Representation over Time.” Politics & Gender 4 (2): 233–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inter Parliamentary Union. 2015. http://www.ipu.org/english/home.htm (July 7, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Shannon. 2007. “A Woman’s Work Is Never Done? Fund-Raising Perception and Effort among Female State Legislative Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 230–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Jane S. 2008. Women Political Leaders: Breaking the Highest Glass Ceiling. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminsky, Jackie, and Timothy J. White. 2007. “Electoral Systems and Women’s Representation in Australia.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 45 (2): 185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanthak, Kristin, and Jonathan Woon. Forthcoming. “Women Don’t Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilfeather, Siobhán. 2005. “Irish Feminism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Modern Irish Culture, eds. Joe Cleary and Claire Connolly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 96–116.
   Google Scholar
• Krook Mona Lena. 2010. “Women’s Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Political Studies 58 (5): 886–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labour Party. 2005. Commission on Women’s Participation in the Labour Party. Dublin: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Maestas, Cherie D., Sarah Fulton, L. Sandy Maisel, and W. Stone. 2006. “When to Risk It? State Legislators and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani, Mack. 2008. “A Gendered Pipeline? The Advancement of State Legislators to Congress in Five States.” Politics & Gender 4 (2): 285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, Michael. 2011. “Presentation of the 2011 INES Results,” Seminar to mark Democracy Day in Leinster House, September 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Shane. 2011. “Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case.” Political Studies 59 (2): 472–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonagh, Eileen. 2002. “Political Citizenship and Democratization: The Gender Paradox.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 535–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, Gail, and Michael Marsh. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Voter Choice: Analysis from a Multimember Preferential Voting System.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 822–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, Gail, and Michael Marsh. 2011. “Electing Women to the Dáil: Gender Cues and the Irish Voter.” Irish Political Studies 26 (4): 521–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGing, Claire. 2013. “The Single Transferable Vote and Women’s Representation in Ireland.” Irish Political Studies 28 (3): 322–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGing, Claire. 2014. “Women’s Roles in Irish Political Parties: Continuity and Change.” In Irish Feminisms: Past, Present and Future, eds. Clara Fischer and Mary McAuliffe. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 189–215.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, Sean. 2008. “Managing Change: Party Competition in the New Ireland.” Irish Political Studies 23 (4): 627–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, Rainbow. 2014. “Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 520–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Women’s Council of Ireland (NWCI). 2009. Who Cares? http://www.nwci.ie/download/pdf/who_cares_october_2009.pdf (January 9, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, Philip J. 1999. “Sick Man or Tigress? The Labour Market in the Republic of Ireland.” In Ireland North and South: Perspectives from Social Science, eds. Anthony F. Heath, Richard Breen, and Christopher T. Whelan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 215–49.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, Pat. 2008. “The Irish Patriarchal State: Continuity and Change.” In Contesting the State: Lessons from the Irish Case, eds. Maura Adshead, Peadar Kirby, and Michelle Millar. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 143–64.
   Google Scholar
• O’Kelly, Michael. 2000. “Gender and Voter Appeal in Irish Elections, 1948–1997.” Economic and Social Review 31 (3): 249–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, Sara. 2007 “Gender and Attitudes to Women’s Employment, 1988–2002.” In Changing Ireland in International Comparison, eds. Betty Hilliard and Máire Nic Ghiolla Phádraig. Dublin: Liffey Press, 115–62.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Barbara, and Dennis Simon. 2003. “Political Ambition and Women in the US House of Representatives, 1916–2000.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 127–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, Pamela, and Sheri Kunovic. 2003. “Women’s Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.” Social Forces 82 (1): 87–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pederson, Mogens N., Ulrick Kjaer, and Kjell Eliassen. 2007. “The Geographical Dimension of Parliamentary Recruitment: Among Native Sons and Parachutists.” In Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change and Convergence, eds. Maurizio Cotta and Heinrich Best. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 160–90.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, Vicky, and Ailbhe Smyth. 1987. “Bishops and Bailiwicks: Obstacles to Women’s Political Participation in Ireland.” Economic and Social Review 18 (3): 189–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidy, Theresa. 2011. “Candidate Selection.” In How Ireland Voted 2011: The Full Story of Ireland’s Earthquake Election, eds. Michael Gallagher and Michael Marsh. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, Michael. 2001. The Role of the Member of Parliament since 1868. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2005. “The Incumbency Disadvantage and Women’s Election to Legislative Office.” Electoral Studies 24 (2): 227–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., Michael Malecki, and Brian F. Crisp. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Electoral Success in Single Transferable Vote Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 693–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, Richard A., Jody Newman, and Melissa Voorhees Leighton. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Shair-Rosenfeld, Sarah, and Magda Hinojosa. 2014. “Does Female Incumbency Reduce Gender Bias in Elections: Evidence from Chile.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (4): 837–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siaroff, Alan. 2000. “Women’s Representation in Legislatures and Cabinets in Industrial Democracies.” International Political Science Review 21 (2): 197–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standards in Public Office Commission. 2011. Guidelines for the General Election to the Thirty-First Dáil. http://www.sipo.gov.ie/en/Guidelines/Election-Guidelines/General-Election-Candidates-and-Election-Agents-2011/General-Election-Candidates-and-Election-Agents-2011.pdf (April 6, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Stockemer, Daniel. 2008. “Women’s Representation: A Comparison between Europe and the Americas.” Politics 28 (2): 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, Manon, and Réjean Pelletier. 2001. “More Women Constituency Party Presidents: A Strategy for Increasing the Number of Women Candidates in Canada?” Party Politics 7 (2): 157–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waylen, Georgina. 2012. “Gender Matters in Politics.” The Political Quarterly 83 (1): 24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, Liam. 2007. “Candidate Selection: Democratic Centralism or Managed Democracy?” In How Ireland Voted 2007: The Full Story of Ireland’s General Election, eds. Michael Gallagher and Michael Marsh. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 48–64.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, Liam, and Aodh Quinlivan. 2009. All Politics in Local: A Guide to Local Elections in Ireland. Cork: Collins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, Susan. 1977. “Women as Political Animals? A Test of Some Explanation for Male Female Political Participation Differences.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (4): 711–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Timothy J. 2006. “Why So Few Women in Dáil Éireann? The Effects of the Single Transferable Vote Election System.” New Hibernia Review 10 (4): 71–83.
   Google Scholar