Evaluation from a Gender+ Perspective as a Key Element for (Re)gendering the Policymaking Process

References

• Abarca, Humberto, and Alejandra Faúndez. 2011. Evaluación con enfoque de igualdad de género y derechos humanos. Sistematización de la práctica en América Latina y El Caribe. Santiago de Chile, Chile: UN Women.
   Google Scholar
• Alfama, Eva, and Marta Cruells. 2013. “How Can Evaluation Contribute to the Gender Mainstreaming Strategy?” Presented at the 3rd European Conference on Politics and Gender (ECPG), Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Progressive Communications. 2005. Gender Evaluation Methodology for Internet and ICTs. A Learning Tool for Change and Empowerment. Melville: Association for Progressive Communications. http://www.genderevaluation.net/( January 31, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, Carol, and Joan Eveline. 2010 Mainstreaming Politics: Gendering Practices. South Australia: The University of Adelaide Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batliwala, Srilatha. 2011. Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation for Women’s Rights: Thirteen Insights for Women’s Organizations. Toronto, Canada: AWID. http://www.awid.org/Library/Strengthening-Monitoring-and-Evaluation-for-Women-s-Rights-Thirteen-Insights-for-Women-s-Organizations ( January 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Brisolara, Sharon, Denise Seigart, and Saumitra SenGupta, eds. 2014. Feminist Evaluation and Research. Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bustelo, Maria. 2003. “Evaluation of Gender Mainstreaming: Ideas from a Metaevaluation Study.” Evaluation 9 (4): 383–403.
   Google Scholar
• Bustelo, María. 2006. “The Potential Role of Standards and Guidelines in the Development of an Evaluation Culture in Spain.” Evaluation 12 (4): 436–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bustelo, María, and Emanuela Lombardo, eds. 2007. Las Políticas de Igualdad en España y en Europa. Madrid, Spain: Editorial Cátedra.
   Google Scholar
• Bustelo, María, and Mieke Verloo. 2009. “Grounding Policy Evaluation in a Discursive Understanding of Politics.” In The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality. Stretching, Bending and Policy-making, eds. E Lombardo, P. Meier, and M. Verloo. London, UK: Routledge, 153–68.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea, Elisabeth Harrison, and Ann Whitehead, eds. 2007. Feminisms in Development: Contradictions, Contestations and Challenges. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 1998. Gender Mainstreaming: Conceptual Framework, Methodology and Presentation of Good Practice. Final Report of Activities of the Group of Specialists on Mainstreaming (EG-S-MS). Strasbourg, Hungary: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Mary E. 2005. “Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice” Social Politics 12 (3): 433–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waal, Maretha. 2006. “Evaluating Gender Mainstreaming in Development Practices.” Development in Practice 16 (2): 209–14.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa Fajardo, Julia. 2011. La Igualdad de Género en la Evaluación de la Ayuda al Desarrollo: Los Casos de la Cooperación Oficial Británica, Sueca y Española. Madrid, Spain: UCM.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa Fajardo, Julia. 2013. “Towards a Gender Sensitive Evaluation? Practices and Challenges in International Development Evaluation.” Evaluation 19 (2): 171–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Jennifer, and Valerie Caracelli, eds. 1997. “Advances in Mixed-method Evaluation: the Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms.” New Directions for Evaluation 74. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Mark Pollack. 2009. “Mainstreaming Gender in the European Union: Getting the Incentives Right.” Comparative European Politics 7 (1): 114–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra, ed. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. Intellectual and Political Controversies. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Katherine. 2012. “Engendering Policies and Programmes through Feminist Evaluation: Opportunities and Insights.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 19 (2): 321–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, Katherine, Ratna M. Sudarshan, and Ethel Mendez. 2012. “Why a Special Issue on Evaluating Gender and Equity.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 19 (2): 179–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Denice, and Denice Cassaro. 2002. “Feminist Evaluation and the Inclusion of Difference.” New Directions for Evaluation 96: 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• House, Ernest R. 1993. Professional Evaluation. Social Impact and Political Consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Juliet, and Ria Brouwers. 2003. Review of Gender and Evaluation. Final Report for DAC Network on Development Evaluation. DAC Series Review—OECD. http://www.oecd.org/derec/dacnetwork/35342762.pdf ( January 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. 2012. “Integrating Gender Equality in Monitoring and Evaluation of Projects.” http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_mas/@eval/documents/publication/wcms_165986.pdf ( January 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jahan, Rounaq. 1995. The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, Emanuela, Petra Meier, and Mieke Verloo. 2017. “Policymaking from Gender+ Equality Perspectives. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38 (1) .
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, Emanuela, Petra Meier, and Mieke Verloo. 2013. “Policymaking.” In Oxford Handbook on Gender and Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longwe, Sara Hlupekile. 1997. “The Evaporation of Gender Policies in the Patriarchal Cooking Pot.” Development in Practice 7 (2): 148–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longwe, Sara Hlupekile. 2005. “Spectacles for Seeing Gender in Project Evaluation.” In Gender Evaluation Methodology for Internet and ICTs. A Learning Tool for Change and Empowerment Melville: Association for Progressive Communications, 35–40. http://www.genderevaluation.net/( January 31, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Mazey, Sonia. 2000. “Introduction: Integrating Gender-Intellectual and ‘Real World’ Mainstreaming.” Journal of European Public Policy 7 (3): 333–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBride Dorothy, and Amy Mazur, eds. 2010. The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, Leslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs 30 (3): 1771–1800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, Donna. 2005. “Feminism.” In Encyclopedia of Evaluation. ed. S. Mathison, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 154.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, Donna M., Joanne Farley, Anna-Marie Madison, and Patti Singleton. 1994. “Diverse Voices in Evaluation Practice: Feminists, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities.” Evaluation Practice 15 (2): 123–29.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Caroline. 1995. “Evaluating Gender Impacts.” In Evaluating Country Development Policies and Programs: New Approaches for a New Agenda, eds. R. Picciotto and R. Rist. New Directions for Evaluation 67: 105–17.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Caroline. 2005. “Has Gender Mainstreaming Failed?” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (4): 576–90.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, Denis J., ed. 1987. The Politics of Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael. 2002. “Feminist, Yes, but Is It Evaluation?” New Directions for Evaluation, 96: 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael. 2011. Developmental Evaluation. Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhace Innovation and Use. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podems, Donna. 2010. “Feminist Evaluation and Gender Approaches: There’s a Difference?” Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation [Online] 6:14. http://survey.ate.wmich.edu/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/199/291 (Accessed July 7, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Pruegl, Elisabeth. 2009. “Does Gender Mainstreaming Work? Feminist Engagements with the German Agricultural State.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 11 (2): 174–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, Teresa. 2005. “Reflections on the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming in Europe.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (4): 555–74.
   Google Scholar
• Roggeband, Conny, and Mieke Verloo. 2006. “Evaluating Gender Impact Assessment in the Netherlands (1994–2004): A Political Process Approach.” Policy and Politics 34 (4): 615–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Katherine, Jennifer Greene, Yvonna Lincoln, Sandra Mathison, and Donna Mertens. 1998. “Advantages and Challenges of Using Inclusive Evaluation Approaches in Evaluation Practice.” American Journal of Evaluation 19: 101–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seigart, Denise. 2005. “Feminist Evaluation.” In Encyclopedia of Evaluation, ed. S. Mathison. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 154–57.
   Google Scholar
• Seigart, Denise, and Sharon Brisolara, eds. 2002. “Feminist Evaluation. Explorations and Experiences.” New Directions for Program Evaluation 96.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, Stephanie A. 2008. “Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective.” Sex Roles 59 (5–6): 301–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sielbeck-Bowen, Kathryn, Sharon Brisolara, Denise Seigart, Camille Tischler, and Elizabeth Whitmore. 2002. “Exploring Feminist Evaluation: The Ground from Which We Rise.” New Directions for Evaluation 96: 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, Judith. 2005. “Is Mainstreaming Transformative? Theorising Mainstreaming in the Context of Diversity and Deliberation.” Social Politics 12 (3): 366–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, Judith. 2007. The New Politics of Gender Equality. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sudarshan, Ratna M., and Divya Sharma. 2012. “Gendering Evaluations: Reflections on the Role of the Evaluator in Enabling a Participatory Process.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 19 (2): 303–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, Daniel L., and Anthony J. Shinkfield. 1985. Systematic Evaluation: A Self Instructional Guide to Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Evaluation Group. 2011. “Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation—Towards UNEG Guidance.” http://www.uneval.org/papersandpubs/documentdetail.jsp?doc_id=980 ( January 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• UNWomen. 2010. “UN Women’s Manager’s Guide to Gender Equality and Human Rights Responsive Evaluation.” http://www.unifem.org/evaluation_manual/( January 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, Mieke. 2005. “Reflections on the Concept and Practice of the Council of Europe Approach to Gender Mainstreaming.” Social Politics 12 (3): 344–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verloo, Mieke, and Conny Roggeband. 1996. “Gender Impact Assessment: The Development of a New Instrument in the Netherlands.” Impact Assessment 14 (1): 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, Sylvia. 2005. “Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice.” Social Politics 12 (3): 321–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Carol H. 1983. “Evaluation Research in the Political Context.” In Handbook of Evaluation Research, eds. E. L Struening and M. B. Brewer. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, Carol H. 1998. Evaluation. Methods for Studying Programs and Policies. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar