Prone to Agreement: Does Context Matter for Men and Women in Political Discussions?

References

• Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, & American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 1968. Men in Dark Times. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, Solomon E. 1956. “Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One against A Unanimous Majority.” Psychological Monographs 70 (9):1–70. doi:10.1037/h0093718.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, Young Min, Magdalena Wojcieszak, and Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2012. “Online versus face-to-face Deliberation: Why? Why? What? with What Effects?” New Media & Society 14 (3):363–83. doi:10.1177/1461444811413191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, Jamie, Richard Norrie, Sofia Patel, Rebekka Rumpel, and Simon Wibberley. 2014 May. “Misogyny on Twitter.” Demos. http://demos.co.uk/files/MISOGYNY_ON_TWITTER.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Basil, Michael D. 2009. ”Standpoint: The Use of Student Samples in Communication Research.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 40: 431–40.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, William L., and John. P McHale. 2003. “Presidential Candidates’ Television Spots and Personal Qualities.” Southern Communication Journal 68 (4):319–34. doi:10.1080/10417940309373270.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Laura W., and Anna Wiederhold. 2014. “Discursive Strategies of Civil Disagreement in Public Dialogue Groups.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 42 (3):285–306. doi:10.1080/00909882.2014.911938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Penelope. 1980. “How and Why are Women More Polite: Some Evidence from a Mayan Community.” In Women and Language in Literature and Society, eds. Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker, and Nelly Furman. New York: Praeger, 111–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah. 1997. “Theoretical Debates in Feminist Linguistics: Questions of Sex and Gender.” In Gender and Discourse, ed. Ruth Wodak. London: Sage, 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah. 1998. “‘Is There Any Ketchup, Vera?’: Gender, Power and Pragmatics.” Discourse and Society 9 (4):437–55. doi:10.1177/0957926598009004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, Taylor N., and Jamie E. Settle. 2016. “Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions.” Political Behavior 38 (4):817–59. doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9335-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, Avner, Eran Chajut, and Kelly Saporta. 2008. “Participation in Class and in Online Discussions: Gender Differences.” Science Direct: Computers and Education 50 (3): 718–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for American Women in Politics. 2017 January. “The Gender Gap: Voting in Presidential Elections.” CAWP. https://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/ggpresvote.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Gina Masullo, and Lu Shuning. 2017. “Online Political Discourse: Exploring Differences in Effects of Civil and Uncivil Disagreement in News Website Comments.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 61 (1):108–25. doi:10.1080/08838151.2016.1273922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, Robert B., C. Peter Herman, Alan Levy, and Scott Evenbeck. 1973. “Attitudinal Politics: The Strategy of Moderation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25 (1):100–08. doi:10.1037/h0034265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffé, Hilde, and Catherine Bolzendahl. 2017. “Avoiding the Subject? Gender Gaps in Interpersonal Political Conflict Avoidance and Its Consequences for Political Engagement.” British Politics 12 (2):135–56. doi:10.1057/bp.2016.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, Pamela Johnston, Donald D. Searing, and Ivor M. Crew. 2002. “The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (1):21–62. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000029.
   Google Scholar
• Crutchfield, Richard S. 1955. “Conformity and Character.” The American Psychologist 10 (5):191–98. doi:10.1037/h0040237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Gregory A. Huber, David Doherty, and Conor M. Dowling. 2012. “Personality and the Strength and Direction of Partisan Identification.” Political Behavior 34 (4):653–88. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9178-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Guiller, Jane, and Alan Durndell. 2006. “‘I Totally Agree with You’: Gender Interactions in Educational Online Discussion Groups.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22 (5):368–81. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00184.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why deliberative democracy?. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Brian F. 2020. A Change Is Gonna Come: How to Have Effective Political Conversations in A Divided America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F. 2007. “Exploring the Forms of self-censorship: On the Spiral of Silence and the Use of Opinion Expression Avoidance Strategies.” Journal of Communication 57 (4):785–802. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00368.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F., Carroll J. Glynn, and James Shanahan. 2005. “Willingness to Self-Censor: A Construct and Measurement Tool for Public Opinion Research.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (3):298–323. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, Mary, Jennie Sweet-Cushman, Elizabeth Prough, and Fred Vultee. 2020. “Who Dominates the Conversation? the Effect of Gender, Discussion Medium and Controversy on Political Discussion.” Feminist Media Studies:1–19. doi:10.1080/14680777.2020.1808036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, Michael A. 1985. “Masculine and Feminine Speech in Dyads and Groups: A Study of Speech Style and Gender Salience.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4 (2):99–112. doi:10.1177/0261927X8500400202.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul E. Johnson, and John Sprague. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, Robert R., and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, Erin Cassese, and Mary-Kate Lizotte. 2008. “Gender, Public Opinion, and Political Reasoning.” In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Christina Wolbrecht, Karen Beckwith, and Lisa Baldez. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Insko, Chester A., Richard H. Smith, Mark D. Alicke, Joel Wade, and Sylvester Taylor. 1985. “Conformity and Group Size: The Concern with Being Right and the Concern with Being Liked.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 11 (1):41–50. doi:10.1177/0146167285111004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3):405–31. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3):690–707. doi:10.1111/ajps.12152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jane, Emma A. 2016. Misogyny Online: A Short (And Brutish) History. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, William L., and Brenda S. Sonner. 2001. ”Just Say No to Traditional Student Samples.” Journal of Advertising Research 41 (5): 63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julier, Alice, and Laura Lindenfeld. 2005. ”Mapping Men Onto the Menu: Masculinities and Food.” Food & Foodways 13 (1–2): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3):560–76. doi:10.2307/2944795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, Shari, and Deborah Tannen. 2001. ”Discourse and Gender, the Handbook of Discourse Analysis.” Oxford, Blackwell Vol. 46: p. 63.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “Language and Woman’s Place.” Language in Society 2 (1):45–79. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, Robin. 2004. Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries. Vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latané, Bibb. 1981. “The Psychology of Social Impact.” American Psychologist 36 (4):343–56. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, Bibb. 1996. “Dynamic Social Impact: The Creation of Culture by Communication.” Journal of Communication 46 (4):13–25. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01501.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizotte, Mary-Kate, and Andrew H. Sidman. 2009. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Politics & Gender 5 (2):127–51. doi:10.1017/S1743923X09000130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manin, Bernard. 1987. ”On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15 (3): 338–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 211–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2007.”“Deliberative. ”Democracy” or “Democratic Deliberation”?.” In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 251–71.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Lilliana. 2013. “The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (1):140–59. doi:10.1177/0002764212463363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Disagree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):128–45. doi:10.1111/ajps.12089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei, Laura R. Winsky. 1998. “Gender and Power in American Legislative Discourse.” Journal of Politics 60 (2): 440–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, Tali, Christopher F. Karpowitz, and J. Baxter Oliphant. 2014. “Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (1):18–44. doi:10.1017/S1537592713003691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, Tali, Christopher F. Karpowitz, and Nicholas Goedert. 2014. ”Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women's Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 291–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Hans K., and Michael Clay Carey. 2015. “Men More Likely to Post Online Newspaper Comments.” Newspaper Research Journal 36 (4):469–81. doi:10.1177/0739532915618417.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Basil, William Brown, and Mihai C. Bocarnea. 2002, October. ”Differences in Univariate Values versus Multivariate Relationships Findings from a Study of Diana, Princess of Wales.” Human Communication Research 28 (4): 501–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Robert L., Rick Wilford, and Freda Donoghue. 1999. ”Personal Dynamics as Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly 52 (2): 269–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadim, Marjan, and Audun Fladmoe. 2019. “Silencing Women? Gender and Online Harassment.” Social Science Computer Review 39 (2):245–58. doi:10.1177/0894439319865518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, Frank. (2018) ”Men, Women Generally Hold Similar Abortion Attitudes” Gallup. HTTPS://NEWS.GALLUP.COM/POLL/235646/MEN-WOMEN-GENERALLY-HOLD-SIMILARABORTION-ATTITUDES.ASPX
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1993. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion—Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, Andrzej, and Robin R. Vallacher. 2001. “Societal Transition: Toward a Dynamical Model of Social Change.” In The Practice of Social Influence in Multiple Cultures, eds. Wilhelmina Wosinska, Robert B. Cialdini, Daniel W. Barrett, and Janusz Reykowski. New York: Psychology Press, 151–71.
   Google Scholar
• Oliphant, J. Baxter 2018, November 20. “Most Say Their Family Is OK with Discussing Politics – But It Helps if the Family Agrees.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/20/most-say-their-family-is-ok-with-discussing-politics-but-it-helps-if-the-family-agrees/
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecelia, and Catherine Johnson. 1990. “What Is the Relationship between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups?” American Journal of Sociology 95 (5):1189–212. doi:10.1086/229426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Cindy Simon, Jocelyn Jones, and James A. Rosenthal. 2003. “Gendered Discourse in the Political Behavior of Adolescents.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (1):97–104. doi:10.1177/106591290305600110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settle, Jaime E., and Taylor N. Carlson. 2019. “Opting Out of Political Discussions.” Political Communication 36 (3):476–96. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1561563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidney, Verba, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch, Kimberly A., Shannon A. Scielzo, Charyl S. Yarbrough, and Patrick J. Rosopa. 2008. “A Comparison of Face-to-face and Electronic Peer-Mentoring: Interactions with Mentor Gender.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 72 (2):193–206. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Dawn Robinson. 1992. “Selective Interaction as a Strategy for Identity Maintenance: An Affect Control Model.” Social Psychology Quarterly 55 (1):12–28. doi:10.2307/2786683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Aaron, Laura Silver, Courtney Johnson, and JingJing Jiang. 2018, May 13. ”More People Comfortable Discussing Politics in Person Than on Their Phones or via Social Media” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/05/13/morepeople-are-comfortable-discussing-politics-in-person-than-on-theirphones-or-via-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Aaron, Laura Silver, Courtney Johnson, and Jingjing Jiang. 2019, May 13. “More People are Comfortable Discussing Politics in Person than on Their Phones or via Social Media.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/05/13/more-people-are-comfortable-discussing-politics-in-person-than-on-their-phones-or-via-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Snydor, Emily. 2019. Disrespectful Democracy: The Psychology of Political Incivility. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, and Alexis Wichowski. 2011. “Political Discussion Online.” In The Handbook of Internet Studies, eds. Mia Consalvo and Charles Ess. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 168–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, Nan M., and Dianne H. Tyson. 2002. “Sex and Power: Gender Differences in computer-mediated Interactions.” Computers in Human Behavior 16 (4):381–94. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00020-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, Deborah. 1998. “‘Oh Talking Voice that Is so Sweet’: The Poetic Nature of Conversation.” Social Research 65 (3): 631–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Meng-Jung, Liang Jyh-Chong, Huei-Tse Hou, and Chin-Chung Tsai. 2015. “Males are Not as Active as Females in Online Discussion: Gender Differences in face-to-face and Online Discussion Strategies.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31 (3):263–77. doi:10.14742/ajet.1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbig, Stacy G., and Carolyn L. Funk. 1999. “Conflict Avoidance and Political Participation.” Political Behavior 21 (3):265–82. doi:10.1023/A:1022087617514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashi, Anita, and Karin V. Rhodes. 2011. “‘Sign Right Here and You’re Good to Go’: A Content Analysis of Audiotaped Emergency Department Discharge Instructions.” Annals of Emergency Medicine 57 (4):315–22. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Nancy Burns, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics 59 (4):1051–72. doi:10.2307/2998592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, Michael. 1999. “Deliberation, and What Else?” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macundo. New York: Oxford University Press, 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zouch, Amin. 2015. “Interruption and Gender in Academic Group Discussions: Tunisian Undergraduates as a Case Study.” International Journal of Arts & Sciences 9 (2): 445–60.
   Google Scholar