The Impact of Party Quotas on Women’s Political Ambition

References

• Achury, Susan, Susan E. Scarrow, Karina Kosiara-Pedersen, and Emilie Van Haute. 2020. “The Consequences of Membership Incentives: Do Greater Political Benefits Attract Different Kinds of Members?” Party Politics 26 (1):56–68. doi:10.1177/1354068818754603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennie, Lynn. 2015. “Party Membership in Britain: A Minority Pursuit.” In Party Members and Activist, eds. Emilie van Haute, Anika Gauja, Keith M. Dowding, and Patrick Dumont. London: Routledge, 189–205.
   Google Scholar
• Bjarnegård, Elin, and Pär Zetterberg. 2011. “Removing Quotas, Maintaining Representation: Overcoming Gender Inequalities in Political Party Recruitment.” Representation 47 (2):187–99. doi:10.1080/00344893.2011.581077.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Gordon S. 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” The American Political Science Review 66 (1):144–59. doi:10.2307/1959283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchert, Jens, and Jürgen Zeiss, eds. 2003. The Political Class in Advanced Democracies: A Comparative Handbook. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruter, Michael, and Sarah Harrison. 2009. “Tomorrow’s Leaders? Understanding the Involvement of Young Party Members in Six European Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (10):1259–90. doi:10.1177/0010414009332463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caul, Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross–National Analysis.” The Journal of Politics 63 (4):1214–29. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffé, Hilde, and Catherine Bolzendahl. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles 62 (5–6):318–33. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, Drude, and Lenita Freidenvall. 2011. Electoral Gender Quota Systems and Their Implementation in Europe. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2006. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Länder 1990–2000.” Party Politics 12 (2):211–32. doi:10.1177/1354068806061338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Political Ambition: Evidence from Germany.” Paper prepared for the 2008 Midwest Political Science Annual Meeting, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2010. “Gender Quota Compliance and Contagion in the 2009 Bundestag Election.” German Politics and Society 28 (3):132–55. doi:10.3167/gps.2010.280308.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2016. Gender Quotas and Democratic Participation: Recruiting Candidates for Elective Offices in Germany. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• den Ridder, Josje, Joop van Holsteyn, and Ruud Koole. 2015. “Party Membership in the Netherlands.” In Party Members and Activist, eds. Haute Emilie van, Anika Gauja, Keith M. Dowding, and Patrick Dumont. London: Routledge, 134–50.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Metheun & Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3):642–59. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00147.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraile, Marta, and Irene Sánchez‐Vítores. 2020. “Tracing the Gender Gap in Political Interest Over the Life Span: A Panel Analysis.” Political Psychology 41 (1):89–106. doi:10.1111/pops.12600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, Sarah A., Cherie D. Maestas, L. S. Maisel, and Walter J. Stone. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2):235–48. doi:10.1177/106591290605900206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauja, Anika, and Emilie van Haute. 2015. “Members and Activists of Political Parties in Comparative Perspective.” In Party Members and Activist, eds. Haute Emilie van, Anika Gauja, Keith M. Dowding, and Patrick Dumont. London: Routledge, 186–201.
   Google Scholar
• Geißel, Brigitte. 1999. Politikerinnen: Politisierung und Partizipation auf kommunaler Ebene. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Heidar, Knut. 2015. ”Party Membership in Norway: Declining but Still Viable?.” In Party Members and , eds. , Anika Gauja, Keith M. Dowding, and Patrick Dumont. London: Routledge, 171–88.
   Google Scholar
• Heidar, Knut, and Bram Wauters. 2019a. “Party Membership as Linkage.” In Do Parties Still Represent? An Analysis of the Representativeness of Political Parties in Western Democracies, eds. Knut Heidar and Bram Wauters. London: Routledge, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Heidar, Knut, and Bram Wauters. 2019b. “Representativeness of Parties: Old Problems, New Challenges.” In Do Parties Still Represent? An Analysis of the Representativeness of Political Parties in Western Democracies, eds. Knut Heidar and Bram Wauters. London: Routledge, 169–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Melanie M., and Pamela Paxton. 2019. “The Political Representation of Women Over Time.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights, eds. Susan Franceschet, Mona L. Krook, and Netina Tan. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Melanie M., Pamela Paxton, Amanda B. Clayton, and Pär Zetterberg. 2019. “Global Gender Quota Adoption, Implementation, and Reform.” Comparative Politics 51 (2):219–38. doi:10.5129/001041519X15647434969795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Melanie M., Pamela Paxton, and Mona L. Krook. 2017. “Gender Quotas for Legislatures and Corporate Boards.” Annual Review of Sociology 43:331–52. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEA. Gender Quotas Database: Country Overview. Accessed August 19, 2020. https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/gender-quotas/country-overview.
   Google Scholar
• Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2005. “In Support of Gender Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender 1 (4):638–45. doi:10.1017/S1743923X05230192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Markus, Philipp Becker, Lisa Czeczinski, Yvonne Lüdecke, Bastian Schmidt, and Frederik Springer. 2019. “Die Sozialstruktur der deutschen Parteimitgliedschaften. Empirische Befunde der Deutschen Parteimitgliederstudien 1998, 2009 and 2017.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 50 (1):81–98. doi:10.5771/0340-1758-2019-1-81.
   Google Scholar
• Kosiara-Pedersen, Karina. 2015. “Party Membership in Denmark: Fluctuating Membership Figures and Organizational Stability.” In Party Members and Activist, eds. Emilie van Haute, Anika Gauja, Keith M. Dowding, and Patrick Dumont. London: Routledge, 66–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeber, Corinna, Vanessa Marent, Jessica Fortin-Rittberger, and Christina Eder. 2019. “Still a Glass Ceiling? Tracing the Limits to Women’s Representation in Elected Office.” Comparative European Politics 17 (1):112–31. doi:10.1057/s41295-018-0114-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, Yvonne, Markus Klein, Frederik Springer, Philipp Bernhold, Lisa Czeczinski, and Bastian Schmidt. 2023. “Der Wandel der Motive für den Parteibeitritt und die Parteimitgliedschaft. Eine empirische Analyse der Deutschen Parteimitgliederstudien 1998, 2009 und 2017.” KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 74 (4):473–98. doi:10.1007/s11577-022-00867-y.
   Google Scholar
• Niederle, Muriel, and Lise Vesterlund. 2008. “Gender Differences in Competition.” Negotiation Journal 24 (4):447–63. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00197.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedermayer, Oskar. 2017. “Parteimitglieder in Deutschland: Version 2017.” Arbeitshefte aus dem Otto-Stammer-Zentrum 20: 27.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Diana Z., and Jennifer M. Piscopo. 2019. “The Impact of Women in Parliament.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights, eds. Susan Franceschet, Mona L. Krook, and Netina Tan. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, Pamela, and Melanie M. Hughes. 2015. “The Increasing Effectiveness of National Gender Quotas, 1990–2010.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (3):331–62. doi:10.1111/lsq.12079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2019. “The Limits of Leaning In: Ambition, Recruitment, and Candidate Training in Comparative Perspective.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (4):817–28. doi:10.1080/21565503.2018.1532917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, Aldo F., and Susan E. Scarrow. 2016. “Which Members? Using Cross-National Surveys to Study Party Membership.” Party Politics 22 (6):679–90. doi:10.1177/1354068814550435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, Aldo F., Susan E. Scarrow, and Susan Achury. 2020. “Quotas, Women’s Leadership and Grassroots Women Activists: Bringing Women into the Party?” European Journal of Political Research 59 (4):867–85. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, Gabriel. 2020. “Mitgliedschaft in Parteien: Ist da jemand?” Accessed March 1, 2021. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/mitgliedschaft-in-parteien-ist-da-jemand-16936416.html.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, Susan E., and Burcu Gezgor. 2010. “Declining Memberships, Changing Members? European Political Party Members in a New Era.” Party Politics 16 (6):823–43. doi:10.1177/1354068809346078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwindt‐Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):570–85. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00202.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyd, Patrick, and Paul Whiteley. 1992. Labour’s Grass Roots: The Politics of Party Membership. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spier, Tim. 2010. “Wer wird Funktionär? Determinanten der Erlangung lokaler politischer Ämter in den Bundestagsparteien.” In Politische Parteien als fragmentierte Organisationen: Erfolgsbedingungen und Veränderungsprozesse, ed. Benjamin Höhne. Opladen & Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 123–51.
   Google Scholar
• Spier, Tim, and Markus Klein. 2015. “Party Membership in Germany: Rather Formal, Therefore Uncool?” In Party Members and Activist, eds. Emilie van Haute, Anika Gauja, Keith M. Dowding, and Patrick Dumont. London: Routledge, 104–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, Robin Devroe, and Benjamin de Vet. 2017. ”Women at the Grassroots: A CrossNational Analysis of Female Party Members.” ECPG Conference on Politics and Gender
   Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, and Hilde van Liefferinge. 2015. “Does Family Politicization Affect Party Membership Activity? A Study of Four Flemish Parties.” PCS–Politics, Culture and Socialization 6 (2):127–47. doi:10.3224/pcs.v6i1-2.09.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, Paul F. 2011. “Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership Across the Democratic World.” Party Politics 17 (1):21–44. doi:10.1177/1354068810365505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteley, Paul, and Patrick Seyd. 2002. High-Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zetterberg, Pär. 2009a. “Engineering equality? Assessing the multiple impacts of electoral gender quotas.” Doctoral dissertation: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Zetterberg, Pär. 2009b. “Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement? Lessons from Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (4):715–30. doi:10.1177/1065912908322411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetterberg, Pär. 2013. “The Dynamic Relationship Between Gender Quotas and Politicalinstitutions.” Politics & Gender 9 (3):316–21. doi:10.1017/S1743923X13000196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar