Drawing bodies and spaces in telecollaboration: a view of research potential in synaesthesia and multimodality, from the outside

References

• Bell, P. (2000). Content analysis of visual images. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), The handbook of visual analysis (pp. 10–34). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Belz, J. A. & Thorne, S. L. (Eds.). (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (1973). Ways of seeing. New York, NY: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, S. (2003). Synaesthesia (1). The Chicago School of media theory. Retrieved from http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/mediatheory/keywords/synaesthesia-1/
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge. Black, R. W. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English-language learners in an online fan fiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. E. (2008). Geography and vision: Seeing, imagining and representing the world. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
•  Cytowic, R. E. (2002). Synesthesia: A Union of the Senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2007). Looking from the inside out: Academic blogging as new literacy. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 167–197). New York, NY: P. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Develotte, C. (2008). Approche de l’autonomie dans un dispositif en ligne: Le cas du dispositif “Le français en (première) ligne”. Revue japonaise de didactique du français, 3(1), 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Develotte, C., Guichon, N., & Kern, R. (2008). “Allo Berkeley? Ici Lyon… Vous nous voyez bien?” Étude d’un dispositif de formation en ligne synchrone franco-américain à travers les discours de ses usagers. Alsic, 11(2), 129–156.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, R. (2005). “You’re not in Kansas anymore”: Interactions among semiotic modes in multimodal texts. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 49–54. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.012
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2006). The utopian body. In C. Jones (Ed.), Sensorium: Embodied experience, technology, and contemporary art (1st ed., pp. 229–234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M., & Breeze, N. (2005). Music composition lessons: the multimodal affordances of technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 415–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (1st ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). Why video games are good for your soul: Pleasure and learning. Melbourne, VIC: Common Ground Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guth, S. & Helm, F. (Eds.). (2010). Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1994). Synaesthesia: An account of coloured hearing. Leonardo, 27(4), 343–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (Ed.). (2005). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Hochel, M., & Milán, E. G. (2008). Synaesthesia: The existing state of affairs. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(1), 93–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, E. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2005). Neurocognitive mechanisms of synesthesia. Neuron, 48(3), 509–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2005). Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse. In S. Norris & R. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 144–154). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H. (2010). Cyberspace and physical space: Attention structures in computer mediated communication. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: language, image, space (pp. 151–167). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kostogriz, A. (2004). Rethinking the spatiality of literacy practices in multicultural conditions. In AARE 2004: Doing the public good: Positioning educational research; AARE 2004 International Education Research conference proceedings (pp. 1–11). Melbourne, VIC.
   Google Scholar
• Kostogriz, A. (2006). Putting “space” on the agenda of sociocultural research. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(3), 176–190.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. L. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83–100). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1998). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53–79). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Changing knowledge in the classroom. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday “Sitings” of Adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211–240. doi:10.1080/14636310303140
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The Changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M. & Sheehy, M. (Eds.). (2004). Spatializing literacy research and practice. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 312–333). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, D. (2011, December). Where is the foreign?: An inquiry into person, place, and the possibility of dialogue in an online French language class (dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, D., & Kramsch, C. (2014). The ambiguous world of heteroglossic computer-mediated language learning. In A. Blackledge & A. Creese (Eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mangenot, F. (2008). La question du scénario de communication dans les interactions pédagogiques en ligne. In M. Sidir, G.-L. Baron, & E. Bruillard (Eds.), Journées communication et apprentissage instrumenté en réseaux (Jocair 2008) (pp. 13–26). Paris: Hermès, Lavoisier.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, A. N. & Baym, N. K. (Eds.). (2009). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. B. (2005). For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. E. (2006). Mode, meaning, and synaesthesia in multimedia L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 56–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. E. (2008). Multimodal synthesis and the voice of the multimedia author in a Japanese EFL context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R. (2006). The use of videoconferencing and e-mail as mediators of intercultural student ethnography. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), AAUSC 2005: Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (1st ed., pp. 86–120). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, R. (Ed.). (2007). Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual literacies: Every object tells a story, language & literacy series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Visual interventions: Applied visual anthropology. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saletnik, J. T. (2002). Synaesthesia (2). The Chicago School of media theory. Retrieved from http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/mediatheory/keywords/synaesthesia-2/
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., & von der Emde, S. (2006). Conflicts in cyberspace: From communication breakdown to intercultural dialogue in online collaborations. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 178–206). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, P. (2004). Representation, rights, and resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the language and literacy classroom. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 95–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, P. (2007). Multimodal pedagogies in diverse classrooms: Representation, rights and resources. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sturken, M., & Cartwright, L. (2009). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528–546.
   Google Scholar
• Ternaux, J.-P. (2003). Synesthesia: A multimodal combination of senses. Leonardo, 36(4), 321–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Zourou, K. (2008). Corrective feedback in telecollaborative L2 learning settings: Findings on symmetry and interaction. JALT CALL, 5(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar