Enabling exemplary teaching: a framework of student engagement for students from low socio-economic backgrounds with implications for technology and literacy practices

References

• Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for diverse students in schooling: Best evidence synthesis – what role this kind of work can and can’t take in building teaching quality. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Conference ‘Building Teacher Quality’, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bogotch, I., & Shields, C. (2014). Introduction: Do promises of social justice trump paradigms of educational leadership? In I. Bogotch & C. M. Shields (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and social (In)justice (Vol. 29, pp. 1–12). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Callow, J., & Zammit, K. (2012). “Where lies your text?” (Twelfth Night Act I, Scene V): Engaging high school students from low socioeconomic backgrounds in reading multimodal texts. English in Australia, 47(2), 69–77. Retrieved from http://www.aate.org.au/journals/english-in-australia
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 65–75. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/vjer20/current. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.1.65-75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, B., & Hill, S. (2000). Socio-economic disadvantage, literacy and social justice: Learning from longitudinal case study research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 79–97. doi:10.1007/BF03219732
   Google Scholar
• Cumming-Potvin, W. (2009). Social justice, pedagogy and multiliteracies: Developing communities of practice for teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 82–99. doi:10.14221/ajte.2009v34n3.4
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
   Google Scholar
• Dukes, C., & Ming, K. (2014). Who among us may be literate? Closing the gap between literacy and diversity. In I. Bogotch & C. M. Shields (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and social (In)justice (Vol. 29, pp. 117–137). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fair Go Project Team. (2006). School is for me: Pathways to student engagement. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011 –No. 098). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
   Google Scholar
• Freebody, P. (2007). Literacy education in school: Research perspectives from the past, for the future. Camberwell, Vic.: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grieshaber, S., Shield, P., Luke, A., & Macdonald, S. (2012). Family literacy practices and home literacy resources: An Australian pilot study. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 12(2), 113–138. doi:10.1177/1468798411416888
   Google Scholar
• Haberman, M. (1995). Star teachers of children in poverty:. West Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers & schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51, 1499–1509. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2011). Didactical design for technology enhanced learning. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 223–238). Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267. doi:10.3102/0091732x07310586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7, 200–222. Retrieved from http://www.ords.co.uk/elea/
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. (2009). Understanding professional practice: A synoptic framework. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kervin, L., Jones, P., & Verenikina, I. (2010). Effective literacy pedagogy: Amplified by technology?. In A. Kanganas (Ed.), aWAy with words (pp. 1–15). Adelaide, South Australia: ALEA/AATE.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies everyday practices and classroom learning (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Coiro, J., Kinzer, C. K., Castek, J., & Henry, L. (2013). New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Mills, M. (2007). Pedagogies making a difference: Issues of social justice and inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 233–244. doi:10.1080/13603110701237472
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Mills, M., & Hayes, D. (2000). Teachers, school reform and social justice: Challenging research and practice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 101–115. doi:10.1007/bf03219733
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., Twiner, A., & Gillen, J. (2010). Instruction as orchestration: Multimodal connection building with the interactive whiteboard. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(2), 130–141. doi:10.1080/15544801003611193
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, A. (2011). Technology, pedagogy and education: Reflections on the accomplishment of what teachers know, do and believe in a digital age. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(3), 301–316. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2011.610931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2010). Will the Australian national curriculum up the intellectual ante in classrooms? Curriculum Perspectives, 10(5). Retrieved from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/page503.asp
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2012). After the testing: Talking and reading and writing the world. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(1), 8–13. doi:10.1002/jaal.00095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A., & Elkins, J. (2002). Towards a critical, worldly literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(8), 668–673. Retrieved from http://www.reading.org/general/publications/journals/jaal.aspx
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A., Freebody, P., Land, R., Booth, S., & Kronk, P. (2000). Literate futures - report of the literacy review for queensland schools. Brisbane, Qld: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A., Woods, A., & Dooley, K. (2011). Comprehension as social and intellectual practice: Rebuilding curriculum in low socioeconomic and cultural minority schools. Theory Into Practice, 50(2), 157–164. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.558445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. (2011). Young children’s literacy practices in a virtual world: Establishing an online interaction order. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(2), 101–118. doi:10.1598/rrq.46.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2002). Motivation and academic resilience: Developing a model for student enhancement. Australian Journal of Education, 46(1), 34–49. doi:10.1177/000494410204600104
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 413–440. doi:10.1348/000709906x118036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, M., & Munns, G. (2002). Student engagement and the social relations of pedagogy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 357–366. doi:10.1080/0142569022000015409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Munns, G. (2013). Learning and behaviour. In G. Munns, W. Sawyer, & B. Cole (Eds.), Exemplary teachers of students in poverty (pp. 47–51). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Munns, G., Arthur, L., Downes, T., Gregson, R., Power, A., Sawyer, W., … Steele, F. (2006). Motivation and engagement of boys: evidence-based teaching practices (Main Report). Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training, DEST Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Munns, G., & Sawyer, W. (2013). Student engagement: The research methodology and the theory. In G. Munns, W. Sawyer, & B. Cole (Eds.), Exemplary teachers of students in poverty (pp. 14–32). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Curriculum Board. (2009). National English Curriculum: Framing paper. Retrieved February 3, 2015, from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/consultation_report_-_english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Board of Studies. (1998). English K-6. Sydney: Board of Studies NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students’ on line: Digital technologies and performance (volume VI). Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264112995-en
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, J. (2009). Understanding changes in teachers’ ICT practices: A longitudinal perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(1), 33–44. doi:10.1080/14759390802704030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando, J. (2013a). Engaging teaching practices with ICT in low SES schools. In G. Munns, W. Sawyer, & B. Cole (Eds.), Exemplary teachers of students in poverty (pp. 136–148). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, J. (2013b). ICT-mediated practice and constructivist practices: Is this still the best plan for teachers’ uses of ICT? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(2), 231–246. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.782702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2002). Learning for the 21st century: A report and mile guide for 21st century skills. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi‐modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843–1866. doi:10.1080/09500690600718294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, K. (2003). The importance of teacher quality as a key determinant of students’ experiences and outcomes of schooling. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Conference ‘Building Teacher Quality’, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, W., Callow, J., Munns, G., & Zammit, K. (2013). What exemplary teachers do. In G. Munns, W. Sawyer, & B. Cole (Eds.), Exemplary teachers of students in poverty (pp. 90–108). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J., Nixon, H., & Erstad, O. (2009). Reviewing approaches and perspectives on ‘Digital Literacy’. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(2), 107–125. doi:10.1080/15544800902741556
   Google Scholar
• Selinger, E. (2009). Towards a reflexive framework for development: Technology transfer after the empirical turn. Synthese, 168(3), 377–403. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9450-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2011). Editorial: In praise of pessimism—the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 713–718. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., Bortoli, L. D., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2009). PISA in brief, highlights from the full Australian report: Challenges for Australian education: Results from PISA 2009. Melbourne: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, T. (2009). Development agendas and the place of ICT. In T. Unwin (Ed.), ICT4D: Information and communication technologies for development (pp. 7–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D., & Kozma, R. (2005). New technologies for literacy and adult education: A global perspective. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2007). Information literacy in the laptop classroom. Teachers College Record, 109, 2511–2540. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. doi:10.3102/0091732x09349791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough, Eng.: Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, A., Dooley, K., Luke, A., & Exley, B. (2014). School leadership, literacy and social justice: The place of local school curriculum planning and reform. In I. Bogotch & C. M. Shields (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and social (In)justice (Vol. 29, pp. 509–520). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-T., Hou, H.-T., Hwang, F.-K., Lee, M.-H., Lai, C.-H., Chiou, G., -L. … Tsai, -C.-C. (2013). A review of intervention studies on technology-assisted instruction from 2005-2010. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 191–203. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. (2011). Moves in hypertext: The resource of negotiation as a means to describe the way students navigate a pathway through hypertext. Linguistics and Education, 22, 168–181. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. (2012). Using information and communication technologies to engage students in the later years of schooling in learning content and literacy: Case studies of three teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 1-10. doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9238-4
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K., & Callow, J. (2013). Literacies in challenging contexts. In G. Munns, W. Sawyer, & B. Cole (Eds.), Exemplary teachers of students in poverty (pp. 109–122). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar