Drawing near and pushing away: critical positioning in multimodal composition

References

• Aukerman, M. (2012). “Why do you say yes to Pedro, but no to me?” Toward a critical literacy of dialogic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 42–48. doi:10.1080/00405841.2012.636335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila, J., & Zacher Pandya, J. (2013). Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. (C. Emerson, Ed.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, M., & Halverson, E. (2012). Representation radio: Digital art-making as transformative pedagogical practice in the college classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(4), 346–363. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2012.715740
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. doi:10.1177/0741088307313177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, A., & Luke, A. (2013). Documenting youth engagement with digital music production in Australia. In K. Jocson (Ed.), Cultural transformations: Youth and pedagogies of possibility. Cambridge: Harvard Education.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J. (2006). Hearing ordinary voices: Cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 20(2), 201–214. doi:10.1080/10304310600641737
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, K. (2011). Resistance is futile: ‘Reaccenting’ the present to create meaningful educational dialogues in the future. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 6(1), 66–80. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2011.532087
   Google Scholar
• Curwood, J., & Gibbons, D. (2010). “Just like I have felt”: Multimodal counternarratives in youth-produced digital media. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(4), 59–77. doi:10.1162/ijlm_a_00034
   Google Scholar
• Dietel-McLaughlin, E. (2009). Remediating democracy: Irreverent composition and the vernacular rhetorics of Web 2.0. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved December 20, 2010, from http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/Dietel/
   Google Scholar
• Dockter, J., Haug, D., & Lewis, C. (2010). Redefining rigor: Critical engagement, digital media, and the new English language arts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(5), 418–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubisar, A., & Palmeri, J. (2010). Palin/Pathos/Peter Grifin: Political video remix and composition pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 27, 77–93. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Gainer, J. (2007). Social critique and pleasure: Critical media literacy with popular culture texts. Language Arts, 85(2), 106–114.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. (2003). Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production and social change. New York, NY: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, E. (2010). Film as identity exploration: A multimodal analysis of youth- produced films. Teachers College Record, 112(9). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Vasudevan, L. (2008). Media, learning, and sites of possibility: New literacies and digital epistemologies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G., & Katz, M. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G., & Nelson, M. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261. doi:10.1177/0741088304274170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janks, H., & Vasquez, V. (2011). Editorial: Critical literacy revisited: Writing as critique. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jocson, K. (2013). Cultural transformations: Youth and pedagogies of possibility. Cambridge: Harvard Education.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., & Vasudevan, L. (2012). Seeing and hearing students’ lived and embodied critical literacy practices. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 34–41. doi:10.1080/00405841.2012.636333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2005). Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse. In S. Norris & R. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 141–154). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007). Critical media literacy is not an option. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 59–69. doi:10.1007/s11519-007-0004-2
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Ketter, J., & Fabos, B. (2001). Reading race in a rural context. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 317–350. doi:10.1080/09518390110029454
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Tierney, J. (2013). Mobilizing emotion in an urban classroom: Producing identities and transforming signs in a race-related discussion. Linguistics and Education, 23, 289–304. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (1994). Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2014). Defining critical literacy. In J. Zacher Pandya & J. Avila (Eds.), Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts. New York, NY: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) .
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, S. (2014). Critical democracy through digital media production in a third- grade classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(2), 197–227. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.908755
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E. (2004). Linking literacy and popular culture: Finding connections for lifelong learning. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., Hull, G., & Roche-Smith, J. (2008). Challenges of multimedia self- presentation: Taking, and mistaking, the show on the road. Written Communication, 25(4), 415–440. doi:10.1177/0741088308322552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis Eds., Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S., & Jones, R. (2005). Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ranker, J., & Mills, K. (2014). New directions for digital video creation in the classroom: Spatiality, embodiment, and creativity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 440–443. doi:10.1002/jaal.278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranker, J. (2014). The emergence of semiotic resource complexes in the composing processes of young students in a literacy classroom context. Linguistics and Education, 25, 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridolfo, J., & DeVoss, D. (2009). Composing for recomposition: Rhetorical velocity and delivery. Kairos, 13.2. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://endora.wide.msu.edu/13.2/topoi/ridolfo devoss/intro.html
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, M., & Panofsky, C. (2009). Designs for multimodality in literacy studies: Explorations in analysis. In K. M. Leander, R. Jimenez, M. Huntley, & V. Risko (Eds.), 58th national reading conference yearbook (99-111). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Soep, E. (2014). Participatory politics: Next-generation tactics to remake public spheres. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vezner, T. (2010). At St Paul’s Central High, brawl breaks out among dozens during rivalry game with Como High. Retrieved from: http://www.twincities.com/ci_16222730?nclick_check=1
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J., & Britt, T. (2007). Experiencing life through the body of film: The convergence of phenomenology and cultural curriculum studies. In S. Springgay & D. Freedman (Eds.), Curriculum and the cultural body (pp. 21–38). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwend, K. E. (2009). Mapping multimodal literacy practices through mediated discourse analysis: Identity revision in “What Not To Wear”. In K. M. Leander, D. W. Rowe, R. Jimenez, D. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, Y. Kim, & V. Risko (Eds.), Fifty-eighth yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 66–81). San Antonio, TX: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwend, K., & Lewis, C. (2011). Critical literacy, critical engagement, digital technology: Convergence and embodiment in glocal spheres. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook on teaching English and language arts (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Zacher Pandya, J., Pagdilao, K., Kim, A., & Marquez, E. (2015). Transnational children orchestrating competing voices in multimodal, digital autobiographies. Teachers College Record, 117(7). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar