An investigation of Singapore preschool children’s emerging concepts of floating and sinking

References

• Baillargeon, R. (1995). Physical reasoning in infancy. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 181–204). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block, J. (1982). Assimilation, accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development. Child Development, 53, 281–295. doi:10.2307/1128971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. G. (2013). Transforming knowledge of how people learn into meaningful instruction. In B. J. Irby, G. Brown, R. Lara-Alecio, & S. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of educational theories (pp. 271–275). Information Age Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bulunuz, M. (2013). Teaching science through play in kindergarten: Does integrated play and science instruction build understanding? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21, 226–249. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2013.789195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butts, D. P., Hofman, H. M., & Anderson, M. (1993). Is hands-on experience enough? A study of young children’s views of sinking and floating objects. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 5(1), 50–64. doi:10.1007/BF03170644
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (2007). Those who can, teach (11th ed.). New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Dentici, O. A., Grossi, M. G., Bordhi, G. L., Ambrosis, A. D., & Massara, C. I. (1984). Understanding floating: A study of children aged between six and eight years. European Journal of Science Education, 6, 235–243. doi:10.1080/0140528840060305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. K. (1987). The development of a concept of material kind. Science Education, 71, 615-628. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECDA (2013a). Early Childhood Development Agency. Retrieved May 3, 2017, from https://www.ecda.gov.sg/pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• ECDA (2013b). Choose a rewarding career in early childhood. Retrieved May 3, 2017, from https://www.ecda.gov.sg/eccareers/Pages/GetSupported.aspx
   Google Scholar
• ECDA (2015). Speech by Mr Chan Chun Sing at MSF Committee of Supply 2015. Retrieved May 18, 2017, from https://www.msf.gov.sg/media-room/Pages/Speech-by-Mr-Chan-Chun-Sing-at-MSF-Committee-of-Supply-2015.aspx
   Google Scholar
• ECDA (2017, February 28). New early childhood development centres bill passed in parliament to raise quality of pre-school centre. Retrieved 2017, May 3, fromhttps://www.ecda.gov.sg/PressReleases/Pages/NEW-EARLY-CHILDHOOD-DEVELOPMENT-CENTRES-BILL-PASSED-IN-PARLIAMENT-TO-RAISE-QUALITY-OF-PRE-SCHOOL-SECTOR–CHILD-CARE-CENTRES.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hadjiachilleos, S., Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2013). The impact of cognitive and affective aspects of cognitive conflict on learners’ conceptual change about floating and sinking. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31, 133–152. doi:10.1080/02635143.2013.811074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Moller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of “floating and sinking”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 307–326. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havu-Nuutinen. (2005). Examining young children’s conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 259–279. doi:10.1080/0950069042000243736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsin, C.-T., & Wu, H.-K. (2011). Using scaffolding strategies to promote young children’s scientific understandings of floating and sinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9310-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannides, C., & Kakana, M. (2001). Mental models of preschool children for the explanation of solid bodies’ floating and sinking in water [in Greek]. In C. Ravanis (Ed.), Introducing young children to science: Educational and instructional dimensions (pp. 127–134). Patras: University of Patras.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14. doi:10.1007/BF02296434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloos, H., Fisher, A., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010). Situated native physics: Task constraints decide what children know about density. Journal of Experimental Psycholgy: General, 139, 625–637. doi:10.1037/a0020977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. S. (1993). Preschoolers’ reasoning about density: Will it float? Child Development, 64, 1637–1650. doi:10.2307/1131460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Strom, D., & Pligge, M. (2001). Similarity of form and substance: Modeling material kind. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress. Mahwah NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Leuchter, M., Saalbach, H., & Hardy, I. (2014). Designing science learning in the first years of schooling. An intervention study with sequenced learning material on the topic of ‘floating and sinking’. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1751–1771. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.878482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacBlain, S. (2014). How children learn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Singapore (2012). Nurturing early learners: A curriculum framework for kindergartens in Singapore. Retrieved September 16, 2016, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/preschool/files/kindergarten-curriculum-framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G. E, & Keil, F. C. (2008). Where is the essence? developmental shifts in children's beliefs about internal features. Child Development, 79, 1344-1356. doi:10.1111/cdev.2008.79.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, D. E., & Klahr, D. (1996). The interaction of domain specific knowledge and domain-general discovery strategies: A study with sinking objects. Child Development, 67, 2709–2727. doi:10.2307/1131748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1930). The child’s conception of physical causality. New York,NY: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1972). To understand is to invent. New York, NY: The Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (2001). The children’s conception of physical causality. London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Pramling, N., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2001). It is floating ‘cause there is a hole: A young child’s experience of natural science. Early Years, 21(2), 139–149. doi:10.1080/713667696
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Selley, N. (1993). Why do things float? A study of the place for alternative models in school science. School Science Review, 74(269), 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Siry, C., & Max, C. (2013). The collective construction of a science unit: Framing curricula as emergent from kindergarteners’ wonderings. Science Education, 97, 878–902. doi:10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21, 177–237. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Carey, S., & Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study on the development of size, weight and density. Cognition, 21(3), 177–237. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straits Times. (2016). Childcare enrolment surges as more mums go back to work. Retrieved 2017, May 18, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/childcare-enrolment-surges-as-more-mums-go-back-to-work
   Google Scholar
• Teichert, M. A., & Stacy, A. M. (2002). Promoting understanding of chemical bonding and spontaneity through student explanation and integration of ideas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 464–496. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. W, Yan, Y. K, & Goh, M. T. (2016). Using prediction-observation-explanation-revision (poer) to structure young children's learning about floating and sinking. Journal Of Emergent Science, 10, 12-23.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. W, Yan, Y. K, Ong, W. L. M, & Goh, M. T. (2018). Affordances of purposeful play. In J. Yeo, T. W. Teo, & K.-S. Tang (Eds.). Science Education Research and Practice in Asia-Pacific and Beyond (pp. 119-132). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2003). Tracing young children’s scientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 33, 433–465. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000005250.04426.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004). From try it and see to strategic exploration: Characterizing young children’s scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 94–118. doi:10.1002/tea.10126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (l0th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar