Scientific strengths and reported effectiveness: a systematic review of multiliteracies studies

References

• Ajayi, L. (2011). A multiliteracies pedagogy: Exploring semiotic possibilities of a Disney video in a third grade diverse classroom. Urban Review, 43, 396–413.
   Google Scholar
• Barden, O. (2012). “…If we were cavemen we’d be fine”: Facebook as a catalyst for critical literacy learning by dyslexic sixth-form students. Literacy, 46(3), 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanič, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blaxter, M. (2013). Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Medical Sociology Online, 7(1), 4–7. Retrieved from http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/resources/Vol7Iss1/7.1-Criteria-for-evaluating_Blaxter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boivin, N., Albakri, R. N., Yunus, Z. B. M., Mohammed, H., & Muniandy, N. (2014). Assessing emergent, social, and multiliteracy practices in urban Malaysian homes. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 10(2), 34–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bokhorst-Heng, W. D., Flagg-Williams, J. B., & West, S. (2014). The palimpsest layers of pre-service teachers’ literacy autobiographies. Pedagogy: An International Journal, 9(4), 343–364.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London, England: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, C. H., Pennington, J. L., & Ndura, E. (2012). Using multimodality as a conceptual lens: Examining two teachers’ learning in the Multiliteracies Teacher Institute Project. Pedagogy: An International Journal, 7(4), 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, D. (2014). Collaborative design: Participatory culture meets multiliteracies in a high school literary. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(3), 198–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, A. (2013). Creating identity: The online worlds of two English language learners. Language and Literacy, 15(3), 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1991). The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, N., Lockyer, L., & Brown, I. (2013). Developing multiliteracies in a technology-mediated environment. Educational Media International, 50(2), 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009b). New media, new learning. In D. R. Cole & D. L. Pullen (Eds.), Multiliteracies in motion: Current theory and practice (pp. 87–104). New York, NY: Routledge. Retrieved from http://newlearningonline.com/_uploads/colenewmedianewlearningchapter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Abrams, S. S. (2017). Multiliteracies: Meaning-making and learning in the era of digital text. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from new London to new times (pp. 35–49). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009a). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogy: An International Journal, 4, 164–195.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, England: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crumpler, T. P., Handsfield, L. J., & Dean, T. R. (2011). Constructing difference differently in language and literacy professional development. Research in the Teaching of English, 46(1), 55–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming-Potvin, W. (2007). Scaffolding, multiliteracies, and reading circles. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(2), 483–507.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming-Potvin, W. M., & Sanford, K. (2015). Countering a ‘back-to-basics’ approach to teacher education: Multiliteracies and on-line discussions in a community of practice. Language and Literacy, 17(1), 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., & de Lange, T. (2007). Re-mixing multimodal resources: Multiliteracies and digital production in Norwegian media education. Learning, Media, and Technology, 32(2), 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Eteokleous, N., & Pavlou, V. (2015). Integrating the multimedia builder software as an educational tool to deliver fairy tales: Promoting multiliteracies and multimodality. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(1), 65–88.
   Google Scholar
• Exley, B. (2007). Meanings emerging in practice for linguistically and culturally diverse students: An early years multiliteracies project. International Journal of Pedagogy and Learning, 3(3), 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2000). Multiliteracies and language: Orders of discourse and intertextuality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 162–181). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K., & Ntelioglou, B. Y. (2011). Which new literacies? Dialogue and performance in youth writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(5), 322–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., Luke, A., & Seglem, R. (in press). Looking at the next twenty years of multiliteracies: A discussion with Allan Luke. Theory Into Practice, 57. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/104625/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2017). A personal retrospective on the new London group and its formation. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from new London to new times (pp. 19–30). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giampapa, F. (2010). Multiliteracies, pedagogy and identities: Teacher and student voices from a Toronto elementary school. Canadian Journal of Education, 33(2), 407–431.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(28), 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goulah, J. (2007). Village voices, global visions: Digital video as a transformative foreign language tool. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouthro, P., & Holloway, S. M. (2013). Preparing teachers to become lifelong learners: Exploring the use of fiction to develop multiliteracies and critical thinking. Language and Literacy, 15(3), 50–68.
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS ONE, 10(9). Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communicates and classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. (2011). Classroom pedagogy, digital literacies and the home-school digital divide. International Journal of Pedagogy and Learning, 6(2), 152–161.
   Google Scholar
• Hepple, E., Sockhill, M., Tan, A., & Alford, J. (2014). Multiliteracies pedagogy: Creating claymations with adolescent, post-beginner English language learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(3), 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydon, R., Moffatt, L., & Iannacci, L. (2015). ‘Every day he has a dream to tell’: Classroom literacy curriculum in a full-day kindergarten. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(2), 171–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, K. (2013). Finding wisdom in practice: The genesis of the Salty Chip, a Canadian multiliteracies collaborative. Language and Literacy, 15(1), 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkin, S. (2008). Telling it all: A story of women’s social capital using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 296–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H., Chiu, Y. J., & Yeh, H. (2013). Multimodal assessment of and for learning: A theory-driven design rubric. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 400–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordan, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 1. Language policy and political issues in education. In T. May & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Language education and multiliteracies (pp. 195–212). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2000). A multiliteracies pedagogy: a pedagogical supplement. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds), Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. pp. 239–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, M., Early, M., & Chemjor, W. (2013). Integrated literacies in a rural Kenyan girls’ secondary school journalism club. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(4), 391–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kervin, L. (2009). ‘GetReel’: Engaging year 6 students in planning, scripting, actualising and evaluating media text. Literacy, 43(1), 29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbourn, B. (2006). The qualitative doctoral dissertation proposal. Teachers College Record, 108(4), 529–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. E. (2015). Exploring identity and multiliteracies through graphic narratives. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 9, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kitson, L., Fletcher, M., & Kearney, J. (2007). Continuity and change in literacy practices: A move towards multiliteracies. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 41/42(2/1), 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182–202). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W. S. E. (2009). Multiliteracies on instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational affiliations: A case of an adolescent immigrant. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 377–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, C., Mark, M., & Jenniss, B. (2014). Indigenizing vocabulary teaching: An example of multiliteracies pedagogy from Unamen Shipu. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 8, 207–222.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, C., Sarkar, M., Mark, M., & Jenniss, B. (2012). Multiliteracies pedagogy in language teaching: An example from an Innu community in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 35(1), 194–224.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, H., Layton, L., Goldbart, J., Lacey, P., & Miller, C. (2012). Conceptualisations of literacy and literacy practices for children with severe learning difficulties. Literacy, 46(2), 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (2001). Literary practices as social acts: Power, status, and cultural norms in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 69–91). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S., Hayashi, H., & Yeung, P. (2012). Negotiating the multi in multilingualism and multiliteracies: Undergraduate students in Vancouver, Canada. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(1), 28–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, C. A., & Rowsell, J. (2013). (Re)designing literacy teacher education: A call for change. Teaching Education, 24(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• McVee, M., Bailey, N. M., & Shanahan, L. E. (2008). Using digital media to interpret poetry: Spiderman meets Walt Whitman. Research in the Teaching of English, 43(2), 112–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A. (2007). “Have you seen Lord of the Rings?” Power, pedagogy, and discourses in a multiliteracies classroom. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 6(3), 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A., & Exley, B. (2014). Time, space, and text in the elementary school digital writing classroom. Written Communication, 31(4), 434–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Luke, A., Davies, B., & Street, B. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 415–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakata, M. (2000). History, cultural diversity and English languages teaching. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 106–120). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. (2001). A book review of “Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures”. Language in Society, 30(2), 281–285. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4169098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntelioglou, B. Y. (2011). ‘But why do I have to take this class?’ The mandatory drama-ESL class and multiliteracies pedagogy. Research in Drama Education: the Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 16(4), 595–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Byrne, W. I., & Smith, S. A. (2015). Multicultural education and multiliteracies: Exploration and exposure of literacy practices with preservice teachers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(2), 168–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. G., & Willis, L. (2014). Walking and talking with living texts: Breathing life against static standardisation. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(1), 76–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirbhai-Illich, F. (2010). Aboriginal students engaging and struggling with critical multiliteracies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Journal, 54(4), 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirbhai-Illich, F., Turner, K. C. N., & Austin, T. Y. (2009). Using digital technologies to address Aboriginal adolescents’ education: An alternative school intervention. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3(2), 144–162.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, G. (2013). Children as co-ethnographers of their plurilingual literacy practices: An exploratory case study. Language and Literacy, 15(3), 4–30.
   Google Scholar
• ProQuest (n.d.). ProQuest Libguides: Home. Retrieved from http://proquest.libguides.com/home.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V., Jacobson, E., & Degener, S. (2004). Print literacy development: Uniting cognitive and social practice theories. London, England: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, L., Hughes, J. M., & Smith, S. (2012). “Thanks for the assignment!”: Digital stories as a form of reflective practice. Language and Literacy, 14(1), 78–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, D. (2011). Non-native English speakers’ multiliteracy learning in beyond-game culture: A sociocultural study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 231.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F., & Gee, E. (2017). Introduction. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from new London to new times (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. L., Booth, A., Sutton, A. J., Miller, T., Smith, J. A., Young, B., … Dixon-Woods, M. (2004). Finding qualitative research: An evaluation of search strategies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4(5), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Shoffner, M., de Oliveira, L., & Angus, R. (2010). Multiliteracies in the secondary English classroom: Becoming literate in the 21st century. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 9(3), 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L. (2009). “And they got married by the church …”: “crazy stories” and the possibilities of collaborative textual transformations. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 8, 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerrett, A. (2011). “Wide open to rap, tagging, and real life”: Preparing teachers for multiliteracies pedagogy. Pedagogy: An International Journal, 6(3), 185–199.
   Google Scholar
• Skerrett, A. (2013). Building multiliterate and multilingual writing practices and identities. English Education, 45(4), 322–360.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L., & Guo, L. (2014). Multiliteracies in an outcome-driven curriculum: Where is its fit? Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tier, J. (2008). Reconceptualizing literacy through a discourses perspective by analyzing literacy events represented in films about school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(6), 510–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timulak, L. (2014). Qualitative meta-analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 481–495). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Towndrow, P. A., Nelson, M. E., & Ysuf, W. F. (2013). Squaring literacy assessment with multimodal design: An analytic case for semiotic awareness. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(4), 327–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar