References
- Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning. In L. Darling-Hammond, B. Barron, P. D. Pearson, A. H. Schoenfeld, E. K. Stage, T. D. Zimmerman,G. N. Cervetti, & J. Tilson (Eds.), Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (pp. 11–70). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
- Calabrese-Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2018). STEM-rich maker learning: Designing for equity with youth of color. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Chue, S., & Lee, Y.-J. (2013). The proof of the pudding?: A case study of an “at-risk” design-based inquiry science curriculum. Research in Science Education, 43, 2431–2454.
- Cunningham, C. (2018). Engineering in elementary STEM education: Curriculum design, instruction, learning, and assessment. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.
- Kang, H., Windschitl, M., Stroupe, D., & Thompson, J. (2016). Designing, launching, and implementing high quality learning opportunities for students that advance scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 1316–1340.
- Lee, Y.-J. (2014). Science education in a straightjacket: The interplay of people, policies, and place in an East-Asian Developmental State. In A.-L. Tan, C. L. Poon, & S. S. L. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore science classroom: Research and practices (pp. 165–189). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez-González, F. J. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103, 799–822.
- Young, M. (2007). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.