The future of written corrective feedback research

References

• Atkinson, D., & Tardy, C. (2018). SLW at the crossroads: Finding a way in the field. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosthwaite, P., Ningrum, S., & Lee, I. (2022). Research trends in L2 written corrective feedback: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of Scopus-indexed research on L2 written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, Article 100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
   Google Scholar
• Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2018). Incorporating global englishes into the ELT classroom. ELT Journal, 72(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y. (2019). Written corrective feedback from an ecological perspective: The interaction between the context and individual learners. System, 80, 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Kim, B., & Yun, H. (2020). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, Article 100450. 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners’ performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System, 25(4), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00045-6
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2009). Ten Mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal, 63(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2020). Utility of focused/comprehensive written corrective feedback research for authentic L2 writing classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, Article 100734. 100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2021). The development of feedback literacy for writing teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 1048–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2023). Problematising written corrective feedback: A global englishes perspective. Applied Linguistics, 44(4), 791–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Luo, N., & Mak, P. (2021). Teachers’ attempts at focused written corrective feedback in situ. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, Article 100809. 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, Z., Lee, I., & Li, S. (2024). Written corrective feedback in second language writing: A synthesis of naturalistic classroom studies. Language Teaching. Advance online publication. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, J., Chang, J., & Ma, L. (2023). Research trends of written corrective feedback in L2 writing: A bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221135172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M. (2021). A comparative study of the impact of focused vs. comprehensive corrective feedback and revision on ESL learners’ writing accuracy and quality. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819879182
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, Article 101899. 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satake, Y. (2020). How error types affect the accuracy of L2 error correction with corpus use. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, Article 100757. 100757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024). A systematic review of ai-based automated written feedback research. ReCALL, 1–23. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(2), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Lan, G. (2021). Enactment of a translingual approach to writing. TESOL Quarterly, 55(2), 398–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Lee, I. (2021). L2 learners’ agentic engagement in an assessment as learning-focused writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 50, Article 100571. 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Liu, C. (2021). Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework. Assessing Writing, 48, Article 100525. 100525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., Zheng, Y., Jiang, L., Liu, C., & Xu, Y. (2021). “I even feel annoyed and angry”: Teacher emotional experiences in giving feedback on student writing. Assessing Writing, 48, Article 100528. 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar