“Rather than Ruin the Fun:” Elaborating on Faking Orgasms as Goal-Oriented Deceptive Communication

References

• Barnett, M. D., Maciel, I. V., Van Vleet, S., & Marsden, A. D. III, (2019). Motivations for faking orgasm and orgasm consistency among young adult women. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, M., & Denes, A. (2019). Lying in bed: An analysis of deceptive affectionate messages during sexual activity in young adults’ romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 67(2), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2018.1557722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. (2018). What does faking orgasms have to do with sexual consent? Sexualities, 21(4), 702–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717708151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6(3), 203–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caton, N. R., & Horan, S. M. (2019). Deceptive affectionate messages: Mate retention deployed under the threat of partner infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3), 147470491986790. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919867902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, S. B., & van Anders, S. M. (2022). Orgasm coercion: Overlaps between pressuring someone to orgasm and sexual coercion. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02156-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2009). Why people conceal or reveal secrets: A multiple goals theory perspective. In A. Afifi, & W. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, Information Management, and Disclosure Decisions: Theories and Applications. (pp. 279–299). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P. (2010). Invited Review Article: A multiple goals theory of personal relationships: Conceptual integration and program overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(6), 824–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510373262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes, A., Horan, S. M., & Bennett, M. (2019). “Faking it” and affectionate communication: Exploring the authenticity of orgasm and relational quality indicators. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2005). Non-normative relationships: is there a norm of (non) normativity? Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310500033909
   Google Scholar
• Fahs, B. (2014). Coming to power: Women’s fake orgasms and best orgasm experiences illuminate the failures of (hetero) sex and the pleasures of connection. Culture. Health & Sexuality, 16(8), 974–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.924557
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. V., Carter, A., & Wong, H. T. (2022). Orgasm and Faking Orgasm: Heterosexual Interactions in China. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.2023087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, D. L., Gillath, O., & Haj-Mohamadi, P. (2017). Development and validation of the pretending orgasm reasons measure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(7), 1973–1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0928-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, E. A., Hornsey, M. J., Larsen, H. F., & Barlow, F. K. (2019). Beliefs about gender predict faking orgasm in heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2419–2433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01510-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbenick, D., Eastman-Mueller, H., Fu, T. C., Dodge, B., Ponander, K., & Sanders, S. A. (2019). Women’s sexual satisfaction, communication, and reasons for (no longer) faking orgasm: Findings from a US probability sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2461–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01493-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2011). Is it worth lying for? Physiological and emotional implications of recalling deceptive affection. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2013). Understanding the routine expression of deceptive affection in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 61(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.751435
   Google Scholar
• Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Do women pretend orgasm to retain a mate? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1121–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9874-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplar, M. E., & Gordon, A. K. (2004). The enigma of altruistic lying: Perspective differences in what motivates and justifies lie telling within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 11(4), 489–507. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00094.x
   Google Scholar
• Lafrance, M. N., Stelzl, M., & Bullock, K. (2017). Resisting the Normative Practice of Faking Orgasm. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 210–222. “I’m Not Gonna Fake It” University Women’s Accounts of https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316683520
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2019). Duped: Truth-default theory and the social science of lying and deception. University Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, E. E., & Lupoli, M. J. (2022). Prosocial lies: Causes and consequences. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, M. G., Welling, L. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Development and initial psychometric assessment of the reasons for pretending orgasm inventory. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 147470491501300. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 47(6), 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903171794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponzetti, J. J. Jr., (Ed.) (2016). Evidence-based approaches to sexuality education: A global perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2020). Sexual compliance in understudied relationships. Communication Studies, 71(5), 879–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2021). Sources and strategies for managing sexual conflict in diverse relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 25(3), 904–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09800-x
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2021). Toward a typology of identity gaps in “non-normative” sexual partner communication. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(4), 1551–1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01870-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2021). Exploring the relational nature of identity gap management in sexual communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50(4), 352–370. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1893794
   Google Scholar
• Rubinsky, V. (2022). Sex talk: The effects of sexual self-disclosure and identity gaps on sexual and relational outcomes in diverse relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 26(4), 1452–1476. Sexuality & Culture. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09953-x
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2021). Coding techniques for quantitative and mixed data. In A. J. Onwuegbuzie & B. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge Reviewer’s Guide to Mixed Methods Analysis. (pp. 151–160). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spottswood, E. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2016). The positivity bias and prosocial deception on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Séguin, L. J., & Milhausen, R. R. (2016). Not all fakes are created equal: examining the relationships between men’s motives for pretending orgasm and levels of sexual desire, and relationship and sexual satisfaction. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 31(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2016.1158803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, C. M., & Fisher, W. A. (2014). “Did you come?” A qualitative exploration of gender differences in beliefs, experiences, and concerns regarding female orgasm occurrence during heterosexual sexual interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(6), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.838934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. J., Stelzl, M., & Lafrance, M. N. (2017). Faking to finish: Women’s accounts of feigning sexual pleasure to end unwanted sex. Sexualities, 20(3), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716649338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar