Evolutionary diversification of the autophagy-related ubiquitin-like conjugation systems

References

• Mizushima N. The ATG conjugation systems in autophagy. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020;63:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama T, Noda NN. Autophagy-regulating protease Atg4: structure, function, regulation and inhibition. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2018;71(1):72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer LM, Burroughs AM, Aravind L. The prokaryotic antecedents of the ubiquitin-signaling system and the early evolution of ubiquitin-like β-grasp domains. Genome Biol. 2006;7(7):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell Burroughs A. The natural history of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-related domains. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2012;17(1):1433–1460.
   Google Scholar
• Burroughs AM, Jaffee M, Iyer LM, et al. Anatomy of the E2 ligase fold: implications for enzymology and evolution of ubiquitin/Ub-like protein conjugation. J Struct Biol. 2008;162(2):205–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang B, Jian L, Byström AS. A genome-wide screen identifies genes required for formation of the wobble nucleoside 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rna. 2008;14(10):2183–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlieker CD, Van Der Veen AG, Damon JR, et al. A functional proteomics approach links the ubiquitin-related modifier Urm1 to a tRNA modification pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(47):18255–18260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noma A, Sakaguchi Y, Suzuki T. Mechanistic characterization of the sulfur-relay system for eukaryotic 2-thiouridine biogenesis at tRNA wobble positions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(4):1335–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakai Y, Nakai M, Hayashi H. Thio-modification of yeast cytosolic tRNA requires a ubiquitin-related system that resembles bacterial sulfur transfer systems. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(41):27469–27476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidel S, Pedrioli PGA, Bucher T, et al. Ubiquitin-related modifier Urm1 acts as a sulphur carrier in thiolation of eukaryotic transfer RNA. Nature. 2009;458(7235):228–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa K, Mizushima N, Noda T, et al. A protein conjugation system in yeast with homology to biosynthetic enzyme reaction of prokaryotes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(11):7462–7465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstrasser M. Origin and function of ubiquitin-like proteins. Nature. 2009;458(7237):422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao S, Zhang W, Fan K, et al. Ionic strength-dependent conformations of a ubiquitin-like small archaeal modifier protein (SAMP2) from Haloferax volcanii. Sci Rep. 2013;3(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjan N, Damberger FF, Sutter M, et al. Solution structure and activation mechanism of ubiquitin-like small archaeal modifier proteins. J Mol Biol. 2011;405(4):1040–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Zhang J, Wang L, et al. Solution structure of Urm1 and its implications for the origin of protein modifiers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(31):11625–11630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Chen H, Yang X, et al. A phylogenetic analysis of the ubiquitin superfamily based on sequence and structural information. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(9):6083–6088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cajee U-F, Hull R, Ntwasa M. Modification by ubiquitin-like proteins: significance in apoptosis and autophagy pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(12):11804–11831.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spang A, Saw JH, Jørgensen SL, et al. Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature. 2015;521(7551):173–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K, Caceres EF, Saw JH, et al. Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature. 2017;541(7637):353–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imachi H, Nobu MK, Nakahara N, et al. Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface. Nature. 2020;577(7791):519–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunoura T, Takaki Y, Kakuta J, et al. Insights into the evolution of Archaea and eukaryotic protein modifier systems revealed by the genome of a novel archaeal group. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(8):3204–3223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennell James R, Caceres EF, Escasinas A, et al. Functional reconstruction of a eukaryotic-like E1/E2/(RING) E3 ubiquitylation cascade from an uncultured archaeon. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs ACD, Maldoner L, Wojtynek M, et al. Rpn11-mediated ubiquitin processing in an ancestral archaeal ubiquitination system. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakamoto H, Nakada-Tsukui K, Besteiro S. The autophagy machinery in human-parasitic protists; diverse functions for universally conserved proteins. Cells. 2021;10(5):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Hama Y, Mizushima N. The evolution of autophagy proteins – diversification in eukaryotes and potential ancestors in prokaryotes. J Cell Sci. 2021;134(13):jcs233742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer S, Eichinger L. Dictyostelium discoideum and autophagy – a perfect pair. Int J Dev Biol. 2019;63(8–9–10):485–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall RS, Vierstra RD. Autophagy: the master of bulk and selective recycling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018;69(1):173–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aslan E, Küçükoglu N, Arslanyolu M. A comparative in-silico analysis of autophagy proteins in ciliates. PeerJ. 2017;5:e2878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellner R, De la Concepcion JC, Maqbool A, et al. ATG8 expansion: a driver of selective autophagy diversification? Trends Plant Sci. 2017;22(3):204–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigden DJ, Michels PA, Ginger ML. Autophagy in protists: examples of secondary loss, lineage-specific innovations, and the conundrum of remodeling a single mitochondrion. Autophagy. 2009;5(6):784–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo E, Woo J, Park E, et al. Comparative analyses of ubiquitin-like ATG8 and cysteine protease ATG4 autophagy genes in the plant lineage and cross-kingdom processing of ATG8 by ATG4. Autophagy. 2016;12(11):2054–2068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemi A, Ben-Dor S, Vardi A. Elucidating the composition and conservation of the autophagy pathway in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Autophagy. 2015;11(4):701–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Liu H, Xu H, et al. Independent losses and duplications of autophagy-related genes in fungal tree of life. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21(1):226–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang Y, Yamamoto H, Sakamoto H, et al. Evolution from covalent conjugation to non-covalent interaction in the ubiquitin-like ATG12 system. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2019;26(4):289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adl SM, Bass D, Lane CE, et al. Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2019;66(1):4–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burki F, Roger AJ, Brown MW, et al. The new tree of eukaryotes. Trends Ecol Evol. 2020;35(1):43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreton J, Izquierdo A, Emes RD. Assembly, assessment, and availability of De novo generated eukaryotic transcriptomes. Front Genet. 2016;6:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MW, Heiss AA, Kamikawa R, et al. Phylogenomics places orphan protistan lineages in a novel eukaryotic super-group. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10(2):427–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss AA, Kolisko M, Ekelund F, et al. Combined morphological and phylogenomic re-examination of malawimonads, a critical taxon for inferring the evolutionary history of eukaryotes. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5(4):171707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassert JFH, Jamy M, Mylnikov AP, et al. New phylogenomic analysis of the enigmatic phylum telonemia further resolves the eukaryote tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36(4):757–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burki F, Kaplan M, Tikhonenkov DV, et al. Untangling the early diversification of eukaryotes: a phylogenomic study of the evolutionary origins of centrohelida, haptophyta and cryptista. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2016;283(1823):20152802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE, Lewis R. Multiple origins of Heliozoa from flagellate ancestors: new cryptist subphylum Corbihelia, superclass Corbistoma, and monophyly of Haptista, Cryptista, Hacrobia and Chromista. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;93:331–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenci U, Sibbald SJ, Curtis BA, et al. Nuclear genome sequence of the plastid-lacking cryptomonad Goniomonas avonlea provides insights into the evolution of secondary plastids. BMC Biol. 2018;16(1):1–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown MW, Sharpe SC, Silberman JD, et al. Phylogenomics demonstrates that breviate flagellates are related to opisthokonts and apusomonads. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;280(1769):20131755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampl V, Hug L, Leigh JW, et al. Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(10):3859–3864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax G, Eglit Y, Eme L, et al. Hemimastigophora is a novel supra-kingdom-level lineage of eukaryotes. Nature. 2018;564(7736):410–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janouškovec J, Tikhonenkov DV, Burki F, et al. A new lineage of eukaryotes illuminates early mitochondrial genome reduction. Curr Biol. 2017;27(23):3717–3724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas BJ. TransDecoder; 2015 [cited Oct 222018]. Available from: https://github.com/TransDecoder/TransDecoder
   Google Scholar
• Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1962:227–245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bateman A, Martin MJ, Orchard S, et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D480–D489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwala R, Barrett T, Beck J, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D8–D13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boratyn GM, Schäffer AA, Agarwala R, et al. Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biology Direct. 2012;7(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eddy SR. HMMER 3.3; 2019 [cited April15 2020]. Available from: http://hmmer.org
   Google Scholar
• Matsui M, Iwasaki W. Graph Splitting: a graph-based approach for superfamily-scale phylogenetic tree reconstruction. Syst Biol. 2020;69(2):265–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann A, Beier V, Franquelim HG, et al. Molecular mechanism of autophagic membrane-scaffold assembly and disassembly. Cell. 2014;156(3):469–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi M, Noda NN, Nakatogawa H, et al. Autophagy-related Protein 8 (Atg8) family interacting motif in Atg3 Mediates the Atg3-Atg8 Interaction and is crucial for the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting pathway. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(38):29599–29607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu S, Kriegenburg F, Gómez‐Sánchez R, et al. Conserved Atg8 recognition sites mediate Atg4 association with autophagosomal membranes and Atg8 deconjugation. EMBO Reports. 2017;18(5):765–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmesser E, Rosenwasser S, Vardi A, et al. Improving transcriptome construction in non-model organisms: integrating manual and automated gene definition in Emiliania huxleyi. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albalat R, Cañestro C. Evolution by gene loss. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(7):379–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carosi JM, Nguyen TN, Lazarou M, et al. ATG8ylation of proteins: a way to cope with cell stress? J Cell Biol. 2021;220(11):1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TN, Padman BS, Zellner S, et al. ATG4 family proteins drive phagophore growth independently of the LC3/GABARAP lipidation system. Mol Cell. 2021;81(9):2013–2030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrotis A, Pengo N, Burden JJ, et al. Redundancy of human ATG4 protease isoforms in autophagy and LC3/GABARAP processing revealed in cells. Autophagy. 2019;15(6):976–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanada T, Noda NN, Satomi Y, et al. The Atg12-Atg5 conjugate has a novel E3-like activity for protein lipidation in autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(52):37298–37302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Qiu Y, Grace CRR, et al. A switch element in the autophagy E2 Atg3 mediates allosteric regulation across the lipidation cascade. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otomo C, Metlagel Z, Takaesu G, et al. Structure of the human ATG12 ATG5 conjugate required for LC3 lipidation in autophagy. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(1):59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda NN, Fujioka Y, Hanada T, et al. Structure of the Atg12-Atg5 conjugate reveals a platform for stimulating Atg8-PE conjugation. EMBO Rep. 2013;14(2):206–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reggiori F, Monastyrska I, Verheije MH, et al. Coronaviruses hijack the LC3-I-positive EDEMosomes, ER-derived vesicles exporting short-lived ERAD regulators, for replication. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7(6):500–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikawa T, Kanoh J, Ishikawa F. Fission yeast Vps1 and Atg8 contribute to oxidative stress resistance. Genes Cells. 2010;15(3):229–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura N, Oku M, Sakai Y. Atg8 regulates vacuolar membrane dynamics in a lipidation-independent manner in Pichia pastoris. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(23):4107–4116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X-M, Yamasaki A, Du X-M, et al. Lipidation-independent vacuolar functions of atg8 rely on its noncanonical interaction with a vacuole membrane protein. Elife. 2018;7:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii A, Kurokawa K, Hotta M, et al. Role of Atg8 in the regulation of vacuolar membrane invagination. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jipa A, Vedelek V, Merényi Z, et al. Analysis of Drosophila Atg8 proteins reveals multiple lipidation-independent roles. Autophagy. 2020;17(9):2565–2575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya D, Qiu H, Lee JM, et al. When less is more: red algae as models for studying gene loss and genome evolution in Eukaryotes. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2018;37(1):81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipaliya SV, Santos R, Salas-Leiva D, et al. Unexpected organellar locations of ESCRT machinery in Giardia intestinalis and complex evolutionary dynamics spanning the transition to parasitism in the lineage Fornicata. BMC Biol. 2021;19(1):19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadi L, Reinke AW. Evolution of microsporidia: an extremely successful group of eukaryotic intracellular parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(2):e1008276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skytte Rasmussen M, Mouilleron S, Kumar Shrestha B, et al. ATG4B contains a C-terminal LIR motif important for binding and efficient cleavage of mammalian orthologs of yeast Atg8. Autophagy. 2017;13(5):834–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satoo K, Noda NN, Kumeta H, et al. The structure of Atg4B–LC3 complex reveals the mechanism of LC3 processing and delipidation during autophagy. EMBO J. 2009;28(9):1341–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong-Hap MA, Mouammine A, Daher W, et al. Regulation of ATG8 membrane association by ATG4 in the parasitic protist Toxoplasma gondii. Autophagy. 2013;9(9):1334–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ML, Yao MC. Role of ATG8 and Autophagy in programmed nuclear degradation in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell. 2012;11(4):494–506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujita N, Itoh T, Omori H, et al. The Atg16L complex specifies the site of LC3 lipidation for membrane biogenesis in autophagy. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(5):2092–2100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsushita M, Suzuki NN, Obara K, et al. Structure of Atg5 Atg16, a Complex Essential for Autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(9):6763–6772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popelka H, Reinhart EF, Metur SP, et al. Membrane Binding and Homodimerization of Atg16 Via Two Distinct Protein Regions is Essential for Autophagy in Yeast. J Mol Biol. 2021;433(5):166809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura T, Kaizuka T, Cadwell K, et al. FIP200 regulates targeting of Atg16L1 to the isolation membrane. EMBO Rep. 2013;14(3):284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammoh N, Florey O, Overholtzer M, et al. Interaction between FIP200 and ATG16L1 distinguishes ULK1 complex-dependent and-independent autophagy. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(2):144–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz D, Shemi A, Rosenwasser S, et al. Hijacking of an autophagy-like process is critical for the life cycle of a DNA virus infecting oceanic algal blooms. New Phytol. 2014;204(4):854–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, et al. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(1):268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonin EV, Yutin N. The dispersed archaeal eukaryome and the complex archaeal ancestor of eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(4):a016188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujioka Y, Noda NN, Fujii K, et al. In vitro reconstitution of plant Atg8 and Atg12 conjugation systems essential for autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(4):1921–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arisue N, Hashimoto T. Phylogeny and evolution of apicoplasts and apicomplexan parasites. Parasitol Int. 2015;64(3):254–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalier-Smith T, Fiore-Donno AM, Chao E, et al. Multigene phylogeny resolves deep branching of Amoebozoa. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;83:293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemieux C, Otis C, Turmel M. Chloroplast phylogenomic analysis resolves deep-level relationships within the green algal class Trebouxiophyceae. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14(1):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turmel M, De Cambiaire J-C, Otis C, et al. Distinctive architecture of the chloroplast genome in the chlorodendrophycean green algae scherffelia dubia and tetraselmis sp. CCMP 881. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Harding T, Kamikawa R, et al. Mitochondrial genome evolution and a novel RNA editing system in deep-branching heteroloboseids. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9(5):1161–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torruella G, De Mendoza A, Grau-Bové X, et al. Phylogenomics reveals convergent evolution of lifestyles in close relatives of animals and fungi. Curr Biol. 2015;25(18):2404–2410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torruella G, Grau-Bové X, Moreira D, et al. Global transcriptome analysis of the aphelid Paraphelidium tribonemae supports the phagotrophic origin of fungi. Commun Biol. 2018;1(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karpov SA, Mamkaeva MA, Aleoshin VV, et al. Morphology, phylogeny, and ecology of the aphelids (Aphelidea, Opisthokonta) and proposal for the new superphylum Opisthosporidia. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr M, Leadbeater BSC, Hassan R, et al. Molecular phylogeny of choanoflagellates, the sister group to Metazoa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(43):16641–16646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato M, Arita M, Kawashima T. Uncovering ecdysozoa-specific sphingomyelin synthase by phylogenetic analysis of metazoan sequences. Zoolog Sci. 2019;36(4):316–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnkowska A, Treitli SC, Brzoň O, et al. The oxymonad genome displays canonical eukaryotic complexity in the absence of a mitochondrion. Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36(10):2292–2312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burki F, Kudryavtsev A, Matz MV, et al. Evolution of Rhizaria: new insights from phylogenomic analysis of uncultivated protists. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10(1):1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sierra R, Matz MV, Aglyamova G, et al. Deep relationships of Rhizaria revealed by phylogenomics: a farewell to Haeckel’s Radiolaria. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;67:53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur R, Shiratori T, Ichiro IK. Taxon-rich multigene phylogenetic analyses resolve the phylogenetic relationship among deep-branching stramenopiles. Protist. 2019;170(5):125682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Gómez SA, Mejía-Franco FG, Durnin K, et al. The new red algal subphylum proteorhodophytina comprises the largest and most divergent plastid genomes known. Curr Biol. 2017;27(11):1677–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database):2010–2012.
   Google Scholar
• Keeling PJ, Burki F, Wilcox HM, et al. The Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project (MMETSP): illuminating the functional diversity of eukaryotic life in the oceans through transcriptome sequencing. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(6):e1001889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, et al. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–i890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu S, Wang J, Chitsaz F, et al. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D265–D268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D733–D745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D427–D432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinegger M, Meier M, Mirdita M, et al. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, et al. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–3152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga M, Inagaki Y. Ubiquity and Origins of Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) Proteins in Eukaryotes. Genome Biol Evol. 2021;13(12):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagih O. Ggseqlogo: a versatile R package for drawing sequence logos. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(22):3645–3647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. https://www.r-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Ashkenazy H, Abadi S, Martz E, et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W344–W350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.3.4. Schrödinger, LLC; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1972–1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, et al. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14(6):587–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Z, Zhang W, Ning W, et al. Model-based analysis uncovers mutations altering autophagy selectivity in human cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar