253
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Evaluation of Permanency Outcomes of Child Protection Mediation

&
Pages 98-121 | Received 29 Mar 2012, Accepted 12 Oct 2012, Published online: 14 Feb 2013

REFERENCES

  • Anderson , G. R. and Whalen , P. 2004 . Permanency planning mediation pilot program: Evaluation final report Lansing , MI : Michigan State Court Administrative Office. .
  • Bailey , J. D. 2007 . Mediators' accounts of empowerment and disempowerment in divorce mediation . Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences , 1 ( 2 ) Retrieved from http://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1042.htm
  • Barsky , A. E. 1999 . Community involvement through child protection mediation . Child Welfare , 78 ( 4 ) : 481 – 501 .
  • Barth , R. , Greeson , J. K. , Guo , S. , Green , R. L. , Hurley , S. and Sisson , J. 2007 . Outcomes for youth receiving intensive in-home therapy or residential care: A comparison using propensity score matching . American Journal of Orthopsychiatry , 77 ( 4 ) : 497 – 505 .
  • Center for Social Services Research. 2004 . The California Title IV-E child welfare waiver demonstration study evaluation: Final report Retrieved from http://cssr.berkeley.edu/research_units/cwrc/publication_details.html#waiver
  • Colman , R. and Ruppel , J. 2007 . Child permanency mediation pilot project: Multi-site process and outcome evaluation study Rensselaer , NY : New York State Office of Children and Family Services. .
  • Courtney , M. E. 1999 . “ Foster care and the cost of welfare reform. ” . In The foster care crisis: Translating research into policy and practice Edited by: Curtis , A. , Grady , D. and Kendall , J. Lincoln , NE : University of Nebraska Press. .
  • D'Agostino , R. B. 1998 . Tutorial in biostatistics: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment and non-randomized control group . Statistics in Medicine , 17 : 2265 – 2281 .
  • Dobbin , S. A. , Gatowski , S. I. and Litchfield , M. 2001 . The Essex County child welfare mediation program: Evaluation results and recommendations . Technical Assistance Bulletin , V ( 4 )
  • Eaton , M. , Whalen , P. and Anderson , G. R. 2007 . Permanency planning mediation pilot program: The Michigan experience . Michigan Child Welfare Law Journal , 10 ( 3 ) : 2 – 10 .
  • Edwards , L. 2009 . Child protection mediation: A 25-year perspective . Family Court Review , 47 ( 1 ) : 69 – 80 .
  • Fuller , T. and Nieto , M. 2009 . Substantiation and maltreatment rereporting . Child Maltreatment , 14 ( 1 ) : 27 – 37 .
  • Gatowski , S. I. , Dobbin , S. A. , Litchfield , M. and Oetjen , J. 2005 . Mediation in child protection cases: An evaluation of the Washington, D.C. family court child protection mediation program Reno , NV : NCJFCJ. .
  • Giovannucci , M. T. 2007 . Future trends in state courts: Dependency mediation Retrieved from http://www.nmma.info/images/ADRMedTrends2007.pdf
  • Gunderson , L. , Cahn , K. and Wirth , J. 2003 . The Washington state long-term outcome study . Protecting Children , 18 ( 1&2 ) : 42 – 47 .
  • Guo , S. , Barth , R. and Gibbons , C. 2006 . Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating substance abuse services for child welfare clients . Children and Youth Services Review , 28 : 357 – 383 .
  • Hardin , M. 1992 . Establishing a core of services for families subject to state intervention Washington , DC : American Bar Association. .
  • Koh , E. and Testa , M. F. 2008 . Propensity score matching of children in kinship and nonkinship foster care: Do permanency outcomes still differ? . Social Work Research , 32 ( 2 ) : 105 – 116 .
  • Kosanke , J. and Bergstralh , E. 2004 . SAS GMATCH macro Retrieved from: http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/mayo/research/biostat/sasmacros.cfm
  • Lande , J. 2001 . Mediation: Child protection mediation—Knowledge and information services Retrieved from http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/KIS_ADRMed_Trends99–00_Pub.pdf
  • Landsman , M. J. , Barber , G. and Thompson , K. 2002 . Expediting permanency through community decision–making . Juvenile and Family Court Journal , 53 ( 4 ) : 79 – 89 .
  • Macomber , J. E. , Scarcella , C. A. , Zielewski , E. H. and Geen , R. 2004 . Foster care adoption in the United States: A state by state analysis of barriers & promising approaches. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411108%5FFosterCareAdoption.pdf
  • Marsh , P. and Crow , G. 1998 . Family group conferences in child welfare Malden , MA : Blackwell Science Ltd. .
  • Mayer , B. 1989 . Mediation in child protection cases: The impact of third-party intervention on parental compliance attitudes . Mediation Quarterly , : 89 – 106 . (24)
  • Mayer , B. 2009 . Reflections on the state of consensus-based decision making . Family Court Review , 47 ( 2 ) : 10 – 20 .
  • McKlindon , A. , Vandivere , S. and Murphey , D. 2011 . Foster care data snapshot. Washington , DC : Child Trends & The Annie E. Casey Foundation. . Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/KnowledgeCenter/Publications.aspx?pubguid=861C80F8–2EFE–4CBF–9D7A–78DA45642EC1
  • Olson , K. B. 2003 . Lessons learned from a child protection mediation program: If at first you succeed and then you don't … . Family Court Review , 41 ( 4 ) : 480 – 496 .
  • Rosenbaum , P. R. and Rubin , D. B. 1983 . The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects . Biometrika , 70 : 41 – 55 .
  • SAS for Windows. 2009 . Release 9.1 Raleigh , North Carolina : SAS Institute Inc. .
  • SPSS for Windows. 2010 . Release 19.0 Chicago : SPSS Inc. .
  • Sinden , A. 1999 . Why won't mom cooperate: A critique of informality in child welfare proceedings . Yale Journal of Law and Feminism , 11 : 339 – 396 .
  • Stack , K. 2003 . Information packet: Child welfare mediation Retrieved from http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/socwork/nrcfcpp/downloads/child–welfare–mediation.pdf
  • Sundell , K. and Vinnerljung , B. 2004 . Outcomes of family group conferencing in Sweden: A 3-year follow-up . Child Abuse & Neglect , 28 ( 3 ) : 267 – 298 .
  • Supreme Court of Virginia. 2002 . Child dependency mediation Retrieved from http://cdm266901.cdmhost.com/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/p266901coll6&CISOPTR=146&CISOBOX=1&REC=2
  • Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. 2006 . Family group decision making: Final evaluation Retrieved from http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/Documents/about/pdf/2006–10-09_FGDM_Evaluation.pdf
  • Thoennes , N. 2001 . Permanent custody mediation Denver , CO : Lucas County Court of Common Pleas Juvenile Division. .
  • Thoennes , N. 2009 . What we know now: Findings from dependency mediation research . Family Court Review , 47 ( 1 ) : 21 – 37 .
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . 2005 . A report to Congress on adoption and other permanency outcomes for children in foster care: Focus on older children Washington , DC : Children's Bureau. .
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . 2006 . Working with the courts in child protection Retrieved from http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/courts/index.cfm
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . 2012 . Information memorandum: Promoting social and emotional well-being for children and youth receiving child welfare services. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/laws_policies/policy/im/2012/im1204.pdf
  • U. S. General Accounting Office . 2002 . Foster care: Recent legislation helps States focus on finding permanent homes for children, but long-standing barriers remain , Washington , D.C. : U.S. General Accounting Office. . (GAO-02–585)
  • Wheeler , C. E. and Johnson , S. 2003 . Evaluating family group decision making: The Santa Clara example . Protecting Children , 18 ( 1&2 ) : 65 – 79 .
  • Wilson , J. B. , Katz , J. and Geen , R. 2005 . Listening to parents: Overcoming barriers to the adoption of children from foster care Cambridge , Mass : Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.