Using Cost Analysis to Examine Variability in Replications of an Efficacious Child Neglect Prevention Program

REFERENCES

• Belenko, S., Patapis, N., & French, M. T. (2005). Economic benefits of drug treatment: A critical review of the evidence for policy makers. Philadelphia, PA: Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Brodowski, M. L., & Filene, J. H. (2009). Engaging program staff in economic evaluation: Lessons learned and recommendations for practice. Protecting Children, 24, 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Burwick, A., Strong, D., Xue, Y., Koball, H., Coffee-Borden, B., Zaveri, H., … Daro, D. (2012). Supporting evidence-based home visiting to prevent child maltreatment: Cost study background and design update. Washington DC: Children's Bureau. Retrieved from: http://www.supportingebhv.org/crossite
   Google Scholar
• Calculating the Costs of Child Welfare Services Workgroup. (2013). Cost analysis in program evaluation: A guide for child welfare researchers and service providers. Washington DC: Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/resource/cost-workgroup
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2. Retrieved from http://www.implementationscience.com/content/2/1/40
   Google Scholar
• Charles, J. M., Edwards, R. T., Bywater, T., & Hutchings, J. (2013). Micro-costing in public health economics: Steps towards a standardized framework, using the Incredible Years Toddler Parenting Program as a worked example. Prevention Science, 14, 377–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corso, P., & Filene, J. H. (2009). Programmatic cost analysis of the family connections program. Protecting Children, 24, 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Corso, P. S., & Lutzker, J. R. (2006). The need for economic analysis in research on child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 727–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, D. M., Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M. T., Feinberg, M. E., & Spoth, R. L. (2012). Resource consumption of a diffusion model for prevention programs: The PROSPER delivery system. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 256–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, D. M., Hill, L. G., Kuklinski, M. R., & Jones, D. E. (2013). Research priorities for economic analyses of prevention: Current issues and future directions. Prevention Science, 4, 1–10. doi:10.007/s11121-013-0429-z
   Google Scholar
• Daro, D., Hart, B., Boller, K., & Bradley, M. C. (2012). Replicating home visiting programs with fidelity: Baseline data and preliminary findings. Washington DC: Children's Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.supportingebhv.org/crossite
   Google Scholar
• Del Grosso, P., Hargreaves, M., Paulsell, D., Vogel, C., Strong, D., Zaveri, H., … Daro, D. (2011). Building infrastructure to support home visiting to prevent child maltreatment: Two-year findings from the cross-site evaluation of the supporting evidence-based home visiting to prevent child maltreatment. Washington DC: Children's Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.supportingebhv.org/crossite
   Google Scholar
• DePanfilis, D. & Dubowitz, H. (2005). Family Connections: A program for preventing child neglect. Child Maltreatment, 10(2), 108–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePanfilis, D., Dubowitz, H., & Kunz, J. (2008). Assessing the cost-effectiveness of Family Connections. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 335–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePanfilis, D., Filene, J. H., & Brodowski, M. L. (2009). Introduction to Family Connections and the national replication effort. Protecting Children, 24(3), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, A., Caldera, D., Rodriguez, K., Burrell, L., Rohde, C., & Crowne, S. (2007). Impact of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filene, J. H., Bell, J., Smith, E .G., & McDonnell, C. J. (2012). National cross-site evaluation of the replication of Family Connections: Final Evaluation Report. Submitted to the Office on Child Abuse and Neglect, Children's Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, and Administration for Children and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature [FMHI Publication No. 231]. Retrieved from http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/resources/implementation-research-synthesis-literature
   Google Scholar
• Foster, E. M., Dodge, K. A., & Jones, D. (2003). Issues in the economic evaluation of prevention programs. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 76–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster, E. M., Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., & Shapiro, C. J. (2008). The costs of a public health infrastructure for delivering parenting and family support. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(2008), 493–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, M., & Holden, E. W. (2002). Benefit-cost analyses of the child welfare demonstration projects: Understanding the resource implications of the IV-E Waivers. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 431–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, M., Porter, M. M., Ayers, T. S., Kaplan, D. L., & Sandler, I. (2007). Estimating the costs of preventative interventions. Evaluation Review, 31, 261–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D., Snowden, L. R., Wulczyn, F., Landsverk, J., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Economic evaluation research in the context of child welfare policy: A structured literature review and recommendations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 722–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomby, D. (2005). Home Visitation in 2005: Outcomes for children and parents. Sunnyvale, CA: Committee for Economic Development, Invest in Kids Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• Haddix, A. C., Teutsch, S. M., & Corso, P. S. (Eds.). (2003). Prevention effectiveness: A guide to decision analysis and economic evaluation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, W., Rousseau O'Connell, S., Connor, T., Brannan, A. M., Foster, M., Blau, G., (2002). Evaluation of the Connecticut Title IV-E Waiver Program: Assessing the effectiveness, implementation Fidelity, and cost/benefits of a continuum of care. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 409–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, L., Landsverk, J., Ward, H., Rolls-Reutz, J., Saldana, L., Wulczyn, F., & Chamberlain, P. (2013). Cost calculator methods for estimating casework time in child welfare services: A promising approach for use in implementation of evidence-based practices and other service innovations. Child and Youth Services Review, 39, 169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James Bell Associates. (2009). Measuring implementation fidelity. Arlington, VA: James Bell Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Karoly, L. A., Kilburn, M. R., Bigelow, J. H., Caulkins, J. P., & Cannon, J. S. (2001). Assessing costs and benefits of early childhood intervention programs: Overview and application to the Starting Early Starting Smart Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Michalopoulos, C., Duggan, A., Knox, V., Filene, J. H., Lee, H., (2013). Revised design for the mother and infant home visiting program evaluation [OPRE Report 2013–18]. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2002). Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago child-parent centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 267–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. R., O'Reilly, A. L., Luan, X., Dai, D., Localio, A. R., & Christian, C. W. (2011). Variation in pregnancy outcomes following statewide implementation of a prenatal home visitation program. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 165, 198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, L., Chamberlain, P., Bradford, W. D., Campbell, M., & Landsverk, J. (2013). The Cost of Implementing New Strategies (COINS): A method for mapping implementation resources using the stages of implementation completion. Child and Youth Services Review, 39, 177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2013). Benefit-costs technical manual: Methods and user guide [document number 13-10-1201b]. Olympia, WA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/TechnicalManual/WsippBenefitCostTechnicalManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yates, B. T. (1994). Analyzing costs, procedures, processes, and outcomes in human services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, B. T. (1999). Measuring and improving cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit for substance abuse treatment programs. Retrieved from http://archives.drugabuse.gov/IMPCOST/IMPCOSTIndex.html
   Google Scholar
• Yates, B. T. (2009). Cost-inclusive evaluation: A banquet of approaches for including costs, benefits, and cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in your next evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 52–54. Retrieved from http://brianyates.net/info/yates_banquet_of_approaches.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarkin, G. A., Dunlap, L. J., & Homsi, G. (2004). The substance abuse services cost analysis program (SASCAP): A new method for estimating drug treatment services costs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar