Evaluation of Practice Frameworks for Social Work with Children and Families: Exploring the Challenges

References

• Antle, B. F., Barbee, A. P., Christensen, D. N., & Martin, M. H. (2008). Solution-based casework in child welfare: Preliminary evaluation research. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 2(2), 197–227. doi:10.1080/15548730802312891
   Google Scholar
• Antle, B. F., Barbee, A. P., Christensen, D. N., & Sullivan, D. J. (2009). The prevention of child maltreatment recidivism through the Solution-Based Casework model of child welfare practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1346–1351. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antle, B. F., Christensen, D. N., Van Zyl, M. A., & Barbee, A. P. (2012). The impact of the Solution Based Casework (SBC) practice model on federal outcomes in public child welfare. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 342–353. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., & Coffey, A. (2004). Analysing documentary realities. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 56–75). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baginsky, M., Moriarty, J., Manthorpe, J., Beecham, J., & Hickman, B. (2017). Evaluation of signs of safety in 10 pilots. London, UK: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/policy-institute/scwru/res/knowledge/signsofsafety.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Barbee, A. P., Christensen, D., Antle, B., Wandersman, A., & Cahn, K. (2011). Successful adoption and implementation of a comprehensive casework practice model in a public child welfare agency: Application of the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) model. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 622–633. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, D. J., Dalgleish, L., Fluke, J., & Kern, H. (2011). The decision making ecology. Retrieved from www.actionchildprotection.org/the-cps-safety-intevention-system/the-cps-safety-intervention-system/
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, H. (2003). Child protection work: Beyond the rhetoric. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, A. (2013). Signs of safety® in England: An NSPCC commissioned report on the Signs of Safety model in child protection. London, UK: NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (1980). The family life cycle. New York, NY: Gardner.
   Google Scholar
• CEBC. (2017). California evidence-based clearinghouse for child welfare. Retrieved March 14, 2017, from http://www.cebc4cw.org/program/solution-based-casework/
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, D. N., Todahl, J., & Barrett, W. C. (1999). Solution based casework: An introduction to clinical and case management skills in casework practice. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• D’Cruz, H., & Jones, M. (2013). Social work research in practice: Ethical and political contexts (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Montigny, G. (2007). Ethnomethodology for social work. Qualitative Social Work, 6(1), 95–120. doi:10.1177/1473325007074168
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, D. M., Grant, H., Horwood, L. J., & Ridder, E. M. (2006). Randomized trial of the Early Start program of home visitation: Parent and family outcomes. Paediatrics, 117(3), 781–786. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., Ormond, R. K., & Turner, H. A. (2006). The victimization of children and youth: A comprehensive national survey. Child Maltreatment, 10(1), 5–25. doi:10.1177/1077559504271287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floersch, J. (2002). Meds, money and manners: The case management of severe mental illness. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2009a). The use of assessment tools in child protection: An ethnomethodological study. University of Melbourne. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1436.8483. Retrieved from http://repository.unimelb.edu.au/10187/4337
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2009b). Practitioner perspectives on the family risk evaluation tool: An aide to decision making or ‘Just Another Form to Fill In’? Developing Practice: The Child, Family and Youth Work Journal, 23(4), 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2011). Decision making tools and the development of expertise in child protection practitioners: Are we “just breeding workers who are good at ticking boxes”? Child and Family Social Work, 16(4), 412–421. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015a). Electronic information systems in human service organisations: The what, who, why and how of information. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1598–1613. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015b). Implementing electronic information systems in human service organizations: The challenge of categorization. Practice: Social Work in Action, 27(3), 163–175. doi:10.1080/09503153.2015.1014334
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2016). The use of electronic information systems to guide practice in social welfare agencies: The perspectives of practitioners as end users. Practice: Social Work in Action, 28(5), 357–372. doi:10.1080/09503153.2015.1135895
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., Harnett, P., Healy, K., Lynch, D., & Tower, M. (2017). Decision making in child and family welfare: The role of tools and practice frameworks. Children Australia, 42(1), 49–56. doi:10.1017/cha.2016.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., & Humphreys, C. (2010). Child protection practitioners and decision making tools: Observations and reflections from the frontline. The British Journal of Social Work, 40(8), 2598–2616. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia. (2017). Child protection: A fresh start. Government of South Australia’s response to the Child Protection Systems Royal Commission report: The life they deserve. Adelaide, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Slembrouck, S., & Sarangi, S. (2006). Language practices in social work: Categorisation and accountability in child welfare. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S. (1991). The sexual abuse cycle. In G. Ryan & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (1985). Relapse prevention. New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The Diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.002125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, K., & Bennett, S. (2014). The compass: Your guide to social impact measurement. Sydney, Australia: The Centre for Social Impact.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report: A Child Centred System. London, UK: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E., Turnell, A., & Murphy, T. (2016). ‘You can’t grow roses in concrete’: Action research final report signs of safety English innovations project. London, UK: Munro Turnell & Murphy Child Protection Consulting. Retrieved from munroturnellmurphy.com
   Google Scholar
• Pecora, P., Chahine, Z., & Graham, J. C. (2013). Safety and risk assessment frameworks: Overview and implications for child maltreatment fatalities. Child Welfare, 92(2), 143–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pithers, W., Marques, J., Gilbat, C., & Marlatt, A. (1983). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressives. In J. Green & I. Stuart (Eds.), Sexual aggressor. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinbold.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. (2004). Doing things with documents. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 76–94). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (1994). Subjectivity matters: The positioned investigator. In C. K. Riessman (Ed.), Qualitative studies in social work research (pp. 133–138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Y., Caslor, M., Turnell, A., Pecora, P., & Pearson, K. (2016). Signs of safety® supervisor practice fidelity assessment: Field test and evaluation report. California: Casey Family Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Salveron, M., Bromfield, L., & Arney, F. (2015) Understanding the Signs of Safety Theory of Change and comparing outcomes for children pre and post Signs of Safety. British Association for the Prevention and Study of Child Abuse and Neglect Conference 12–15th April 2015, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (1991). A methodology for the Twenty-First Century. Social Forces, 70(1), 1–17. doi:10.1093/sf/70.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Y. (2014). Rethinking decision making: An ethnographic study of worker agency in crisis intervention. Social Service Review, 88(3), 407–442. doi:10.1086/677846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (2002). The notion of member is at the heart of the matter: On the role of membership knowledge in ethnomethodological inquiry. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, A. (2008) Adoption of signs of safety as the department for child protection’s child protection practice framework: Background paper. Internal report. Perth, Western Australia: Department for Child Protection.
   Google Scholar
• van Zyl, M. A., Barbee, A. P., Cunningham, M. R., Antle, B. F., Christensen, D. N., & Boamah, D. (2014). Components of the solution-based casework child welfare practice model that predict positive child outcomes. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 8(4), 433–465. doi:10.1080/15548732.2014.939252
   Google Scholar
• Wandersman, A., Snell-Johns, J., Lentz, B., Fetterman, D., Keener, D., & Livet, M. (2005). The principles of empowerment evaluation. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, J., & Hogg, V. (2012). Signs of Safety and the Child Protection Movement. In C. Franklin, T. S. Trepper, W. Gingerich, & E. E. McCollum (Eds.), Solution-focused brief therapy. A handbook of evidence-based practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar