A Multiple-Path Model of Workforce Development for Improving the Fidelity of Family Team Conference in the Child Welfare System

References

• Ahn, H., Hartzel, S., & Shaw, T. (2018). Participants’ satisfaction with family involvement meetings: Implications for child welfare practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(8), 952–963. doi:10.1177/1049731516666328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Annie E. Casey Foundation (2013). Four approaches to family team meetings. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/FourApproachestoFamilyTeamMeetings.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Augsberger, A. (2014). Strategies for engaging foster care youth in permanency planning family team conferences. Children and Youth Services Review, 43, 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, L. H., Bright, C. L., & DePanfilis, D. (2017). Contributors to fidelity of child welfare-related interventions: A Review. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 11(4–5), 433–463. doi:10.1080/15548732.2017.1340222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, S. K., Schneiderman, R. L., & Zoloth, E. (2017). Building an evidence base for effective supervision practices: An analogue experiment of supervision to increase EBT fidelity. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44(2), 293–307. doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0723-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzin, S. C., Thomas, K. L., & Cohen, E. (2007). Assessing model fidelity in two family group decision-making programs: Is this child welfare intervention being implemented as intended? Journal of Social Service Research, 34(2), 55–71. doi:10.1300/J079v34n02_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & Wayne, J. (2013). The implicit curriculum in social work education: The culture of human interchange. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(1), 2–14. doi:10.1080/08841233.2012.746951
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Webb, C. M., & Bostock, L. (2013). The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice (2000–2012). Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1843–1853. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2002). Bringing families to the table: A comparative guide to family meetings in child welfare. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2016). Family engagement: Partnering with families to improve child welfare outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Policy and Practice Group. (2001). Handbook for family team conferencing: Promoting safe and stable families. Montgomery, AL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Collins-Camargo, C., & Royse, D. (2010). A study of the relationships among effective supervision, organizational culture promoting evidence-based practice, and worker self-efficacy in public child welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 4(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/15548730903563053
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Accreditation-Process/2015EPAS_Web_FINAL-(1).pdf.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, D., & Natarajan, A. (2006). Connections between group work and family meetings in child welfare practice: What can we learn from each other? Social Work with Groups, 28(1), 65–79. doi:10.1300/J009v28n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Crea, T. M., & Berzin, S. C. (2009). Family involvement in child welfare decision-making: Strategies and research on inclusive practices. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(3), 305–327. doi:10.1080/15548730903129970
   Google Scholar
• Crea, T. M., Crampton, D. S., Knight, N., & Paine-Wells, L. (2011). Organizational factors and the implementation of family to family: Contextual elements of systems reform. Child Welfare, 90(2), 143–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana, B. (2010). Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) climate survey process and tool. American Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, S., Creemers, H. E., Asscher, J. J., Deković, M., & Stams, G. J. J. (2016). The effectiveness of family group conferencing in youth care: A meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 62, 100–110. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. M. (2012). The implementation of wraparound in California’s Title IV-E child welfare waiver demonstration project. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(7), 1331–1336. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., I, K. A., & VanDyke, M. K. (2019). Implementation Science & Practice. Chapel Hill, NC: Active Implementation Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L., LeBeau, M., Kindler, D., Behan, C., Morales, I. M., & Freundlich, M. (2012). The pivotal role of child welfare supervisors in implementing an agency’s practice model. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(7), 1273–1282. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, E. J., Murray, K., & Rushovich, B. (2013). Using multi-informed fidelity data to determine the impact of a neutral child welfare facilitator for permanency decision teams. Child Welfare, 92(6), 111–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, P., Kanak, S., & Atkins, J. (2009). Building a model and framework for child welfare supervision. Portland, ME: National Resource Center for Family-Centered Practice and Permanency Planning and the National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• James Bell Associates. (2015). Family connection discretionary grants 2011-funded grantees cross site evaluation report—Final. Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Imburgia, T. M., Armstrong‐Richardson, E., Jaggers, J. W., & Hall, J. A. (2019). Effects of case characteristics on teamwork in family meetings. Child & Family Social Work, 24(4), 477–485. doi:10.1111/cfs.12627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Pierce, B. J., Jaggers, J. W., Imburgia, T. M., & Hall, J. A. (2016). Improving child welfare services with family team meetings: A mixed methods analysis of caseworkers’ perceived challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 261–268. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.09.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Trahan, M., Bellamy, J., & Hall, J. A. (2019). Advancing the innovation of family meeting models: The role of teamwork and parent engagement in improving permanency. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBrenz, C. A., & Fong, R. (2016). Outcomes of family centered meetings for families referred to Child Protective Services. Children and Youth Services Review, 71, 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalayants, M., DePanfilis, D., Merkel-Holguin, L., Baldwin, M., Schmidt, M., Treinen, J., … Anderson, T. (2022). Building evidence for family group decision-making in child welfare: Operationalizing the intervention. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 16(3), 376–401. doi:10.1080/15548732.2021.1891185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33–43. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x
   Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A., Hayes, M. J., Cronin, T. W., & Julien-Chinn, F. (2014). Supporting family-centered practice through supervision: An evaluation of strengths-based supervision. Families in Society, 95(4), 227–235. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.2014.95.29
   Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A., & Julien-Chinn, F. J. (2017). Do the components of strengths-based supervision enhance child welfare workers’ satisfaction with supervision? Families in Society, 98(2), 146–155. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.2017.98.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A., & Rounds, T. (2009). Strengths-based supervision: A child welfare supervision training project. The Clinical Supervisor, 28(2), 124–140. doi:10.1080/07325220903334065
   Google Scholar
• Merkel-Holguin, L., & Marcynyszyn, L. A. (2015). The complexity of fidelity in measuring system change: The case of family group decision making. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 724–736. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel-Holguin, L., Nixon, P., & Burford, G. (2003). Learning with families: A synopsis of FGDM research and evaluation in child welfare. Protecting Children, 18(1–2), 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, D. C., Katz, J., Chien, V., Wandersman, A., Scaccia, J. P., & Wright, A. (2012). Practical Implementation Science: Developing and piloting the quality implementation tool. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3/4), 481–496. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9521-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullmann, M. D., Bruns, E. J., & Sather, A. K. (2013). Evaluating fidelity to the wraparound service model for youth: Application of item response theory to the Wraparound Fidelity Index. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 583–598. doi:10.1037/a0031864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauktis, M. E., Bishop-Fitzpatrick, L., Jung, N., & Pennell, J. (2013). Family group decision making: Measuring fidelity to practice principles in public child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(2), 287–295. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockhill, A. (2021). Parents’ experiences of family team meetings in child welfare. Child & Family Social Work, 26(3), 370–378. doi:10.1111/cfs.12818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushovich, B., Hebert, A., Crampton, D., & Malm, K. (2021). Results From A Randomized Controlled Trial Of Team Decision-Making. Children and Youth Services Review, 131, 106263. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. S., Koroloff, N., & Schutte, K. (2003). Implementing high-quality collaborative individualized service/support planning: Necessary conditions. Portland, OR: Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. S., & Matarese, M. (2011). Using a theory of change to drive human resource development for wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 791–803. doi:10.1007/s10826-011-9532-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, M., Vanyukevych, A., & Levesque, S. (2015). Engaging parents: Assessing child welfare agency onsite review instrument outcomes. Families in Society, 96(3), 211–218. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.2015.96.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. B. (1997). On parallel process in social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25(4), 425–435. doi:10.1023/A:1025748600665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar