395
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

From Theory to Clinical Practice: Psychoanalytic Complexity Theory and the Lived Experience of Complexity

, Psy.D., M.F.T.

References

  • Benjamin, J. (2004), Beyond doer and done to. Psychoanal. Quart., 73:5–46.
  • Bonn, E. (2010), Turbulent contextualism: Bearing complexity toward change. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 5(1):1–18.
  • Brothers, D. (2008), Toward a Psychology of Uncertainty: Trauma-Centered Psychoanalysis. New York: The Analytic Press.
  • Coburn, W. (2002), A world of systems: The role of systemic patterns of experience in the therapeutic process. Psychoanal. Inq., 22(5):655–677.
  • Coburn, W. (2007), Psychoanalytic complexity: Pouring new wine directly into one’s mouth. In: New Developments in Self Psychology Practice, eds. P. Buirski & A. Kottler. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 3–22.
  • Coburn, W. J. (2009), Attitudes in psychoanalytic complexity: An alternative to postmodernism in psychoanalysis. In: Beyond Postmodernism: New Dimensions in Clinical Theory and Practice, eds. R. Frie and D. Orange. New York: Routledge, pp. 183–200.
  • Coburn, W. (2014), Psychoanalytic Complexity: Clinical Attitudes for Therapeutic Change. New York: Routledge.
  • Fogel, A. (1993), Developing Through Relationships: Origins of Communication, Self, and Culture. Chicago: Simon and Schuster.
  • Franks, N. R. (1989), Army ants: A collective intelligence. Amer. Scient., 77:138–145.
  • Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2004), Chaotic possibilities. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 85:419–441.
  • Ghent, E. (2002), Wish, need drive. Contemp. Psychoanal., 26:763–808.
  • Grebow, H. (2014), In my right mind: Truth in the guise of illusion. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 9:339–360.
  • Harris, A. (2005), Gender as Soft Assembly. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1971), The Analysis of the Self. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
  • Lear, J. (2006), Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Miller, M. L. (1999), Chaos, complexity and psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Psychol., 16:355–379.
  • Mitchell, M. (2009), Complexity: A Guided Tour. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mitchell, S. (1997), Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Orange, D. M. (2011), The Suffering Stranger: Hermeneutics for Everyday Clinical Practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Piers, C. (2005), The mind’s multiplicity and continuity. Psychoanal. Dial., 15:229–254.
  • Sander, L. W. (2002), Thinking differently. Psychoanal. Dial., 12:11–42.
  • Seligman, S. (2005), Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 15:285–319.
  • Sperry, M. (2011), This better be good! Complex systems and the dread of influence. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 6:74–98.
  • Sperry, M. (2013), Putting our heads together: Mentalizing systems. Psychoanal. Dial., 23:683–699.
  • Stolorow, R. D. (1997), Dynamic, dyadic, intersubjective systems: An evolving paradigm for psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Psychol., 14:337–364.
  • Stolorow, R. D. (2015), A phenomenological-contextual, existential, and ethical perspective on emotional trauma. Psychoanal. Rev., 102:123–138.
  • Stolorow, R. E., Brandchaft, B. & Atwood, G. E. (1987), Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Sucharov, M. (2013), Thoughts on wholeness, connection and healing: Moving toward complexity in the analytic space. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 8:379–397.
  • Thelen, E. (2005), Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanal. Dial., 15(2):255–284.
  • Thelen, E. & Smith, L. (1994), A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Togashi, K. (2014), Is it a problem for us to say, “It’s a coincidence that the patient does well?” Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 9:87–100.
  • Trop, G., Burke, M. & Trop, J. (2002), Thinking dynamically in psychoanalytic theory and practice. Progress Self Psychol., 18:432–444.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1969), The use of an object. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 50:711–716.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.