INSIGHT Telling and Showing: The Intersection of Visual Communication Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Strategies in STEM

References

• Bayer, T., Curto, K., & Kriley, C. (2005). Acquiring expertise in discipline-specific discourse: An interdisciplinary exercise in learning to speak biology. Across the Disciplines, 2, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Book, C. L. (1989). Communication education: Pedagogical content knowledge needed. Communication Education, 38(4), 315–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britsch, S. (2009). Differential discourses: The contribution of visual analysis to defining scientific literacy in the early years classroom. Visual Communication, 8(2), 207–228. doi:10.1177/1470357209102114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumberger, E. (2007). Visual communication in the workplace: A survey of practice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 369–395.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, H., & Niemann, P. (2012). Visualizing science: The reception of PowerPoint presentations. Visual Communication, 11(3), 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, P. B., & Lowry, M. J. (2005). Connecting visuals to written text and written text to visuals in science. Across the Disciplines, 3(1). Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/archives.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Dake, D. M. (2007). A natural visual mind: The art and science of visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 27(1), 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D., Gaffney, A. H., & Martin, K. N. (2008). Beyond content, deeper than delivery: What critique feedback reveals about communication expectations in design education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P. (2001). Time to speak up: A theoretical framework of situated pedagogy and practice for communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 50(2), 144–158.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P. (2002). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: Speaking in engineering. Communication Education, 51(3), 254–268.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, A. L. (2005). Public presentations in mechanical engineering and the discourse of technology. Communication Education, 54(1), 20–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, A. L., & Dannels, D. P. (2003). Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on the role of oral communication in the workplace. Communication Education, 52(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Desnoyers, L. (2001). Toward a taxonomy of visuals in science communication. Technical Communication, 58, 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Evanko, D. (2013). Data visualization. A view of every Points of View column. Nature Methods. Retrieved from http://blogs.nature.com/methagora/2013/07/data-visualization-points-of-view.html
   Google Scholar
• Finson, K., & Pederson, J. (2011). What are visual data and what utility do they have in science education? Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 66–85.
   Google Scholar
• George, D. (2002). From analysis to design: Visual communication in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 54, 11–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, M. J., & Thornton, J. W. (2010). Analyzing protein structure and function using ancestral gene reconstruction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 20(30), 360–366. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2010.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. A. (2003). Reading the visual in college writing classes. In M. Helmers (Ed.), Intertexts: Reading pedagogy in college writing classrooms (pp. 123–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007/09/013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indiana University South Bend. (2014). General education. Retrieved from https://www.iusb.edu/general-educ/course-approval-docs/visual-literacy-course-characteristics.php
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, J., & McGill, G. (2012). Visualizing protein interactions and dynamics: Evolving a visual language for molecular animation. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 103–110. doi:10.1187/cbe.11-08-0071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S., & Chung, D. S. (2012). Exploring the current state of and future directions for visual communication curriculum in the United States. Visual Communication Quarterly, 19, 134–147.
   Google Scholar
• Kurasaki, K. S. (2000). Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods, 12(3), 179–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maskiewicz, A. C., & Lineback, J. E. (2013). Misconceptions are “so yesterday!” CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12, 352–356. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-01-0014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 256–265. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean, P., Johnson, C., Rogers, R., Daniels, L., Reber, J., Slator, B. M., Terpstra, J., & White, A. (2005). Molecular and cellular biology animations: Development and impact on student learning. Cell Biology Education, 4, 169–179. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-07-0047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGrath, M., & Brown, J. R. (2005 October). Visual learning for science and engineering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(5), 56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Northcut, K. M. (2011). Insights from illustrators: The rhetorical invention of paleontology representations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 20, 303–326.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. (2000). Taking the visual turn in research and scholarly communication: Key issues in developing a more visually literate (social) science. Visual Sociology, 15, 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, S., & Sastre, A. (2014). The image is (not) the event: Negotiating the pedagogy of controversial images. Visual Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 198–209.
   Google Scholar
• Poe, M., Lerner, N., & Craig, J. (2010). Learning to communicate in science and engineering: Case studies from MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., & Warner, A. B. (2006). What you see is (not) what you get: Collaborative composing in visual space. Across the Disciplines, 3(1). Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/archives.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Rieber, L. P. (1990). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 135–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosier, J., & Dyer, P. (2010). Visual literacy: A necessary skill for planning graduates? Social Alternatives, 29(40), 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2004). Different visions, different visuals: A social semiotic analysis of field-specific visual composition in scientific conference presentations. Visual Communication, 3(2), 145–175.
   Google Scholar
• Rundgren, C. J., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2009). Critical features of visualizations of transport through the cell membrane—An empirical study of upper secondary and tertiary students' meaning-making of a still image and an animation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 223–246. doi:10.1007/s10763-009-9171-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo, J. (2007). By design. Visual Communication Quarterly, 14, 189–190.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, E. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
   Google Scholar
• UC Davis. (2014). General education requirements. Retrieved from http://catalog.ucdavis.edu/ugraded/gereqt.html
   Google Scholar
• Vrchota, D. (2011). Communication in the disciplines: Interpersonal communication in dietetics. Communication Education, 60(2), 210–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, C. (2013). Observation inscriptions at work: Visualization and text production in experimental physics research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 150–171.
   Google Scholar