438
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Agar, M. (2006). Culture: Can you take it anywhere? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 1–10.
  • Arendell, T. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1192–1207.
  • Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103.
  • Baym, N. K. (1999). Tune in, log on. SAGE.
  • Baym, N. (2009). What constitutes quality in qualitative internet research? In A. Markham & N. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 173–189). SAGE.
  • Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE.
  • Bechmann, A., & Lomborg, S. (2013). Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation. New Media & Society, 15(5), 765–781.
  • Benavides, M., León, J., & Ponce De León, M. (2015). The co-occurrence of domestic and child violence in urban Peru: Evidence from three regions. Journal of Family Violence, 30(8), 1045–1053.
  • Berriman, L., & Thomson, R. (2015). Spectacles of intimacy? Mapping the moral landscape of teenage social media. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(5), 83–597.
  • Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds. Princeton University Press.
  • Burela, A., Piazza, M., Alvarado, G., Gushiken, A., & Fiestas, F. (2014). Aceptabilidad del castigo físico en la crianza de los niños en personas que fueron víctimas de violencia física en la niñez en Peru. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 31(4), 669–675.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. SAGE.
  • Chin, B., & Morimoto, L. (2013). Towards a theory of transcultural fandom. Participations, 10(1), 92–108.
  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
  • Elliott, K. (2013). Theorizing adaptations/adapting theories. In J. Bruhn, A. Gjelsvik, & E. Frisvold Hanssen (Eds.) Adaptation studies: New challenges, new directions (pp. 19–45). Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Elliot, K. (2014). Rethinking formal-cultural and textual-contextual divides in adaptation studies. Literature/Film Quarterly, 42(4), 576–593.
  • Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-step. SAGE.
  • Franzke, A., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C., & the Association of Internet Researchers. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
  • Gage, A., & Silvestre, E. (2010). Maternal violence, victimization, and child physical punishment in Peru. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(7), pp. 523–533.
  • García-Rapp, F. (2018). My friend Bubz: Building intimacy on YouTube’s beauty community. In R. Andreassen, M. Petersen, K. Harrison, & T. Raun (Eds.), Mediated intimacies. Connectivities, relationalities and proximities (pp. 282–295). Routledge.
  • García-Rapp, F. (2019). Trivial and normative? Online fieldwork within YouTube’s beauty community. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 48(5), 619–642.
  • Garey, A. I. (1999). Weaving work and motherhood. Temple University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford University Press.
  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing.
  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). SAGE.
  • Guilluy, A. (2018). The lady knows the recipe: Challenges of carrying out a feminist study of Hollywood romantic comedy. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 140, 7–38.
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
  • Han, X., & Kuipers, G. (2021). Humour and TikTok memes during the 2020 pandemic lockdown: Tensions of gender and care faced by Chinese mothers working from home. China Information, 35(3), 393–419.
  • Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
  • He, G., Leurs, K., & Li, Y. (2022). Researching motherhood in the age of short videos: Stay-at-home mothers in China performing labor on Douyin. Media and Communication, 10(3), 273–289.
  • Hine, C. (2009). How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects? In A. N. Markham, & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 1–20). SAGE.
  • Hutcheon, (2000). A theory of parody: The teachings of twentieth-century art forms. University of Illinois Press
  • Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory of adaptation. Routledge.
  • Instituto de Opinión Pública (IOP) Pontificia Universidad Cahtólica del Perú (PUCP). (2017). Estilos de crianza en el Perú. Obediencia y respeto versus responsabilidad y autonomía. Report 143, June. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/70658
  • Lange, P. (2009). Videos of affinity on YouTube. In P. Snickars & P. Vonderau (Eds.), The YouTube reader (pp. 70–88). National Library of Sweden.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1065–1122). SAGE.
  • Jenson, J. (1992). Fandom as pathology: The consequences of characterization. In L. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience (pp. 9–29). Routledge.
  • Kennedy, M. (2020). ‘If the rise of TikTok dance and e-girl aesthetic has taught us anything, it’s that teenage girlsrule the internet right now’: TikTok celebrity, girls, and the Coronavirus crisis. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 1069–1076.
  • Lewis, L. (2003). Something more than love: Fan stories on film. In L. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience (pp. 135–162). Routledge.
  • Livingstone, S. (2003). On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication, 18(4), 477–500.
  • Livingstone, S. (2005). On the relation between audiences and publics. pp. 17–43 In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Audiences and publics. When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere (pp. 17–43). Intellect.
  • Livingstone, S. (2015). Active audiences? The debate progresses but is far from resolved. Communication Theory, 25(4), 439–446.
  • López, C., Herrera-Amighetti, L. D., Wissow, L. S., Gutierrez, M. I., Levav, I., & Maddaleno, M. (2000). Parenting and physical punishment: Primary care interventions in Latin America. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 8, 257–267.
  • Majluf, A. (1989). Prácticas de crianza en madres de estratos socioeconómico medio y bajo de Lima. Revista De Psicología, 7(2), 151–161.
  • Manrique, D., Ghesquière, P., & van Leeuwen, K. (2014). Parenting, socioeconomic status and psychosocial functioning in Peruvian families and their children. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 995–1005.
  • Markham, A. (2009). How can qualitative researchers produce work that is meaningful across time, space, and culture? In A. Markham & N. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 131–155). Sage.
  • Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AOIR Ethics Committee. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
  • Marshall, P. D. (2006). The celebrity culture reader. Routledge.
  • Marshall, P. D. (2014). Celebrity and power: Fame in contemporary culture. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
  • Molina, M. (2006). Transformaciones histórico-culturales del concepto de maternidad y sus repercusiones en la identidad de la mujer. Psykhe, 15(2), 93–103.
  • Morley, D. (1998). So-called cultural studies: Dead ends and reinvented wheels. Cultural Studies, 12(4), 476–497
  • Morley, D. (2007). Media, modernity, and technology: The geography of the new. Routledge.
  • Morley, D. (2015). Cultural studies, common sense, and communications: The infra-ordinary, the interdisciplinary and the particular. Cultural Studies, 29(1), 23–31.
  • Morley, D., & Silverstone, R. (1991). Communication and context: Ethnographic perspectives on the media audience. In K. N. Jensen & N. H. Jankowski (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 149–162). Routledge.
  • Peirone, F. (2018). El saber tecnológico: De saber experto a experiencia social. Virtualidad, Educación y Ciencia, 10(18), 66–80.
  • Redmond, S. (2014). Celebrity and the media. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rutsky, R., & Wyatt, J. (1990). Serious pleasures: Cinematic pleasure and the notion of fun. Cinema Journal, 30, 3–19.
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  • Sandvoss, C. (2005). Fans: The mirror of consumption. Polity.
  • Schellewald, A. (2021). Communicative forms on TikTok: Perspectives from digital ethnography. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1437–1457.
  • Seperak Viera, R., Cerellino, L., Ochoa-Luna, J., Torres-Valer Basauri, A., & Dianderas Cáceres, C. (2019). Motherhood in Perú through the use of sentiment analysis in Facebook. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 74, 1031–1055.
  • Shifman, L. (2007). Humor in the age of digital reproduction: Continuity and change in internet-based comic texts. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 23.
  • Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. Routledge.
  • Şot, İ. (2022). Fostering intimacy on TikTok: A platform that ‘listens’ and ‘creates a safe space.’ Media, Culture & Society, 44(8), 1490–1507.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE.
  • Thompson, J. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Polity Press.
  • Tobeña, V. (2020). Pensar el futuro de la escuela desde comunidades de prácticas: Claves desde TikTok. Dilemata, 12(33), 221–233.
  • Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., & Abidin, C. (2022). Music challenge memes on TikTok: Understanding in group storytelling videos. International Journal of Communication, 16, 26.
  • Wolcott, H. F. (2008). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Altamira Press.
  • Wolcott, H. F. (2010). Ethnography lessons: A primer. Left Coast Press.
  • Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890.