187
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Noncompleting Drug Court Clients: A Qualitative Assessment of Harm Reduction Effects

&

REFERENCES

  • Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, I., … Stroup, D.F. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 637–639 doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
  • Belenko, S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, I(1), 1–42.
  • Belenko, S. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. New York, NY: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
  • Brownell, K.D., Marlatt, G.A., Lichtenstein, E., & Wilson, G.T. (1986). Understanding and preventing relapse. American Psychologist, 41, 765–782.
  • Bryer, T. (2010, May). Qualitative analysis. Paper presented at the COHPA Faculty Summer Research Institute 2010, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
  • Bugental, J.F. T. (1988). What is ‘failure’ in psychotherapy? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 25, 532–535.
  • Butzin, C.A., Saum, C.A., & Scarpitti, F.R. (2002). Factors associated with completion of a drug treatment court diversion program. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1615–1617.
  • Cahill, J., Barkham, M., Hardy, G., Rees, A., Shapiro, D.A., Stiles, W.B., & Macaskill, N. (2003). Outcomes of patients completing and not completing cognitive therapy for depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 133–143.
  • Cissner, A.B., & Rempel, M. (2005). The state of drug court research. Moving beyond ‘do they work?’ Washington, DC: Center for Court Innovation. doi:98-DC-VX-K007
  • Cooper, C.S. (1997). 1997 drug court survey report. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project.
  • Cosden, M., Peerson, S., & Crothers, L. (1999). Evaluation of the Santa Barbara County Substance Abuse Treatment Courts: Year three. National Drug Court Institute Review, II(3), 148–151.
  • Deschenes Piper, E., Anglin, D.M., & Speckart, G. (1991). Narcotics addiction: Related criminal careers, social and economic costs. Journal of Drug Issues, 21, 383–411.
  • DiClemente, C.C., Schlundt, D., & Gemmell, L. (2004). Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. American Journal on Addictions, 13, 103–119.
  • Finigan, M.W. (1998). An outcome program evaluation of the Multnomah County STOP Drug Diversion Program. Portland, OR: Northwest Professional Consortium.
  • Fischer, M., Geiger, B., & Hughes, M.E. (2007). Female recidivists speak about their experience in drug court while engaging in appreciative inquiry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 703–721.
  • Franco, C. (2010). Drug courts: Background, effectiveness, and policy issues for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
  • Fulton Hora, H.P. (2002). A dozen years of drug treatment courts: Uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1469–1488.
  • Goldkamp, J.S. (1994). Miami's treatment drug court for felony defendants: Some implications of assessment findings. The Prison Journal, 74, 110–157.
  • Goldkamp, J.S., White, M.D., & Robinson, J.B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 27–72.
  • Goldkamp, J.S., White, M.D., & Robinson, J.B. (2002). An honest chance: Perspectives on drug courts. Alexandria, VA: Crime and Justice Research Institute.
  • Gorski, T.T. (1993). Relapse prevention: A state of the art overview (preventing drug abuse relapse). Addiction & Recovery, 13, p. 25.
  • Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2005). Adult drug courts. Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes (GAO Publication No. 05–219). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • GAO. (2011). Adult drug courts. Studies show courts reduce recidivism, but DOJ could enhance future performance measure revision efforts (GAO Publication No. 12–53). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Irvin, J.E., Bowers, C.A., Dunn, M.E., & Wang, M.C. (1999). Efficacy of relapse prevention: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 563–570.
  • King, R.S., & Pasuarella, J. (2009). Drug courts: A review of the evidence. Washington, DC: Sentencing Project. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/dp_drugcourts.pdf
  • Listwan, S.J., Sundt, J.L., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. (2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 389–411.
  • Little, J., & Franskoviak, P. (2010). So glad you came! Harm reduction therapy in community settings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 175–188.
  • Logan, D.E., & Marlatt, G.A. (2010). Harm reduction therapy: A practice-friendly review of research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 201–214.
  • Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morral, A., Harrell, A., McBride, D., … Iguchi, M. (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 7–25.
  • Marlowe, D.B., & Kirby, K.C. (1999). Effective use of sanctions in drug courts: Lessons from behavioral research. National Drug Court Institute Review, II(1), 1–25.
  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G., B. (2010). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mauser, E., Van Stelle, K.R., & Moberg, D.P. (1994). The economic impact of diverting substance-abusing offenders into treatment. Crime & Delinquency, 40, 568–588.
  • McCoy, C. (2010). Do drug courts work? For what, compared to what? Qualitative results from a natural experiment. Victim & Offenders, 5, 64–74.
  • Naeem, F., Bhatti, F., Pickering, R., & Kingdon, D. (2007). A controlled trial of the effectiveness of drug treatment & testing orders (DTTO) with standard care. Journal of Substance Use, 12, 253–265.
  • National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Special Report. (2006). Drug courts: The second decade (NCJ 211081). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
  • Office of Justice Programs. (1997). Defining drug court: The key components. (National Criminal Justice Reference No. NCJ205621). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Oser, C.B., Mooney, J.L., Staton-Tindall, M., & Leukefeld, C.G. (2009). The drugs–violence nexus among rural felony probationers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1285–1303 doi:10.1177/0886260508322183
  • Pekarik, G. (1983). Improvement in clients who have given different reasons for dropping out of treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 909–913.
  • Pekarik, G. (1992). Posttreatment adjustment of clients who drop out early vs. late in treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 379–387.
  • Peters, R.H., Hass, A.L., & Murrin, M.R. (1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, II(1), 33–57.
  • Podkopacz, M.R., Eckberg, D.A., & Zehm, K. (2004). Drug Court Defendant Experience and Fairness Study. Fourth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota, 1–46.
  • Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., & Norcross, J.C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1114.
  • Redko, C., Rapp, R.C., Elms, C., Snyder, M., & Carlson, R.G. (2007). Understanding the working alliance between persons with substance abuse problems and strengths-based case managers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 39, 241–250.
  • Rempel, M., Fox-Kralstein, D., Cissner, A., Cohen, R., Labriola, M., Farole, D., … Magnani, M. (2003). The New York State Adult Drug Court evaluation: Policies, participants, and impacts. Center for Court Innovation, 197–216.
  • Roberts, J.C., & Wolfer, L. (2011). Female drug offenders reflect on their experiences with a county drug court program. The Qualitative Report, 16, 84–102. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-1/roberts.pdf
  • Roman, J.K., Chalfin, A., Reid, J., & Reid, S. (2008). Impact and cost–benefit analysis of the Anchorage Wellness Court. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
  • Rossman, S.B., Rempel, M., Roman, J.K., Zweig, J.M., Lindquist, C.H., Green, M.P., … Farole, D., Jr. (2011). The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation: The impact of drug courts (Vol. 4). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
  • Rossman, S.B., Roman, J.K., Zweig, J.M., Lindquist, C.H., Rempel, M., Willison, J.B. P., … Fahrney, K. (2011). The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation: Study design and overview (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
  • Rubio, D.M., & Cheesman, F. (2008). Florida Statewide Technical Assistance Project: Development of a plan for the statewide evaluation of Florida's drug courts. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, National Center for State Courts, Court Consulting Services Division.
  • Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 152, 332–340.
  • Sechrest, D.K., & Shichor, D. (1999). Riverside County Drug Court evaluation. National Drug Court Institute Review, II(1), 114–116 98-DC-VX-K007
  • Senjo, J.D. S. (2001). Drug court implementation: An empirical assessment of court procedure on offender program completion. Justice Professional, 14, 239–267.
  • Sindelar, J.L., Jofre-Bonet, M., French, M.T., & McLellan, A.T. (2004). Cost-effectiveness analysis of addiction treatment: Paradoxes of multiple outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 73, 41–50.
  • Strathdee, S.A., Ricketts, E.P., Huettner, S., Cornelius, L., Bishai, D., Havens, J.R., … Latkin, C.A. (2006). Facilitating entry into drug treatment among injection drug users referred from a needle exchange program: Results from a community-based behavioral intervention trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 83, 225–232.
  • Tatarsky, A. (2003). Harm reduction psychotherapy: Extending the reach of traditional substance use treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 249–256.
  • Tatarsky, A., & Kellogg, S. (2010). Integrative harm reduction psychotherapy: A case of substance use, multiple trauma, and suicidality. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 123–135.
  • Tatarsky, A., & Marlatt, G.A. (2010). State of the art in harm reduction psychotherapy: An emerging treatment for substance misuse. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 117–122.
  • Thomas, G. (2005). Harm reduction for special populations in Canada. Harm reduction policies and programs for persons involved in the criminal justice system. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
  • Turner, S., Greenwood, P., Fain, T., & Deschenes, E. (1999). Perceptions of drug court: How offenders view ease of program completion, strengths and weaknesses, and the impact on their lives. National Drug Court Institute Review, II(1), 61–83.
  • Turner, S., Longshore, D., Wenzel, S., Dechenes, E., Greenwood, P., Fain, T., … McBride, D. (2002). A decade of drug treatment court research. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1489–1527.
  • Vito, G.F., & Tewksbury, R.A. (1999). Jefferson County Drug Court Program: Impact evaluation, 1997. National Drug Court Institute Review, II(2), 145–146.
  • Walter, S.D., Guyatt, G., Montori, V.M., Cook, R., & Prasad, K. (2006). A new preference-based analysis for randomized trials can estimate treatment acceptability and effect in compliant patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 685–696.
  • Whiteside, U., Cronce, J.M., Pedersen, E.R., & Larimer, M.E. (2010). Brief motivational feedback for college students and adolescents: A harm reduction approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 150–163.
  • Wilson, D.B., Mitchell, O., & Mackenzie, D.L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487.
  • Witkiewitz, K., & Marlatt, G.A. (2004). Relapse prevention for alcohol and drug problems: That was Zen, this is Tao. American Psychologist, 59, 224–235.
  • Witkiewitz, K., Marlatt, G.A., & Walker, D. (2005). Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for alcohol and substance use disorders. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19, 211–228.
  • Wright, C.C., & Sim, J. (2003). Intention-to-treat approach to data from randomized controlled trials: A sensitivity analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 833–842.
  • Zweig, J.M., Rossman, S.B., Roman, J.K., Markman, J.A., Lagerson, E., & Shafer, C. (2011). The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court evaluation: What's happening with drug courts? A portrait of adult drug courts in 2004 (Vol. 2). Rockville, MD: National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.