Practical Support Facilitates Recovery Processes in Professionally Organized Addiction Self-Help: An Explanatory Case Study

REFERENCES

• Alcoholics Anonymous. (2007). AA fact file. New York, NY: General Service Office of Alcoholics Anonymous.
   Google Scholar
• Alcoholics Anonymous Norway. (2013). Gruppeoversikt [List of Groups]. Retrieved from http://www.anonymealkoholikere.no/cms/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2013-Modifisert-se-dato16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American and New Jersey Self-Help Group Clearinghouses. (1990). Starting a new self-help group. Denville, NJ: Saint Clare's Health System.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., Andres-Hyman, R., Tondora, J., Fry, J., & Kirk, T. (2008). From ‘double trouble’ to ‘dual recovery’: Integrating models of recovery in addiction and mental health. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 4, 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., & Roe, D. (2007). Recovery from versus recovery in serious mental illness: One strategy for lessening confusion plaguing recovery. Journal of Mental Health, 16, 459–470. doi: 10.1080/09638230701482394
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., & White, W. (2007). The concept of recovery as an organizing principle for integrating mental health and addiction services. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 34, 109–120. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9053-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, E., Gaston, R.L., Furlong, E., Murali, V., & Copello, A. (2005). United Kingdom substance misuse treatment workers’ attitudes toward 12-step self-help groups. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29, 321–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demant, J., & Järvinen, M. (2011). Social capital as norms and resources: Focus groups discussing alcohol. Addiction Research & Theory, 19, 91–101. doi: 10.3109/16066351003725776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fangen, K. (2010). Deltagende observasjon [Participatory observation] (2nd ed.). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. (2007Seeking recovery, finding confusion. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/21/AR2007072101356.html
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gossop, M., Trakada, K., Stewart, D., & Witton, J. (2005). Reductions in criminal convictions after addiction treatment: 5-year follow-up. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 79, 295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (2001). Social context and ‘natural recovery’: The role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems. Substance Use and Misuse, 36, 1543–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. (2010). Alcoholics Anonymous: Still sober after 75 years. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2361–2363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guastello, S.J. (1995). Facilitative style, individual innovation, and emergent leadership in problem solving groups. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 225–239. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1995.tb01397.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of constructionist research. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hummelvoll, J.K. (2008). The multistage focus group interview: A relevant and fruitful method in action research based on a co-operative inquiry perspective. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sykepleieforskning, 10(1), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, K. (2004). Circles of recovery. Self-help organizations for addictions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, A.B., Brendryen, H., Darnell, F., & Wennesland, D.K. (2013). Practical support aids addiction recovery: The positive identity model of change. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 201–212. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas, L.A. (1998). Hip and helpful: Alcoholics Anonymous in Marin County, California. In I. Eisenbach-Stangl & P. Rosenquist (Eds.), Diversity in unity: Studies of Alcoholics Anonymous in eight societies (pp. 25–53). Helsinki, Finland: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J.M., & Johnson, C. (2004). Stigmatized individuals and the process of identity. Sociological Quarterly, 45, 807–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J.F. (2003). Self-help for substance-use disorders: History, effectiveness, knowledge gaps, and research opportunities. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 639–663. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(03)00053-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. F., Stout, R. L., Magill, M., Tonigan, J. A., & Pagano, M. E. (2011). Spirituality in recovery: A lagged mediational analysis of Alcoholics Anonymous' principal theoretical mechanism of behavior change. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 35(3), 454463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J.F., & White, W.L. (2012). Broadening the base of addiction mutual-help organizations. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 7, 82–101. doi: 10.1080/1556035X.2012.705646
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, H.A. (2002). Alcoholics Anonymous discourse and members’ resistance in a virtual community: Exploring tensions between theory and practice. Contemporary Drug Problems, 29, 749–778.
   Google Scholar
• Klaw, E., & Humphreys, K. (2000). Communication patterns in an online mutual help group for problem drinkers. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 535–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, E. (1980). Not God: A history of Alcoholics Anonymous. Center City, MN: Hazelden Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, E. (2008). The collected Ernie Kurtz, Hindsfoot Foundation Series on Treatment and Recovery. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Kvalitativt forskningsintervju [Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing] (2nd ed.). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2007). Analysing qualitative longitudinal research in evaluations. Social Policy and Society, 6, 545–556.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E.A. (2003). Leadership: Starting at the top. In C.L. Pearce & J.A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 271–284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, K., Arminen, I., Bloomfield, K., Eisenbach-Stangl, I., Bergmark, K.H., Kurube, N., … Zielinski, A. (1996). Alcoholics Anonymous as a mutual-help movement: A study in eight societies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mantell, J., Alexander, E., & Kleiman, M. (1976). Social work and self-help groups. Health & Social Work, 1(1), 86–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matthiesen, S.B. (2002). Situasjonsbestemt ledelse—keiserens nye klær? [Situational Leadership: Emperor's new clothes?] In A. Skogstad & S. Einarsen (Eds.), Ledelse på godt og vondt. Effektivitet og trivsel, side [Leadership for better or worse] (pp. 289–309). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D.M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W.R., & Rose, G.R. (2009). Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. American Psychologist, 64, 527–537. doi: 10.1037/a0016830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, O., Borg, M., Karlsson, B., Almåsbakk, L., Solberg, P., & Torkelsen, I.H. (2013). ‘Å delta med det du kan’: Betydningen av meningsfulle aktiviteter i recoveryprosesser [“To participate with what you can”: The importance of meaningful activities in recovery processes]. Tidsskrift for Psykisk Helsearbeid, 10, 219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, M.E., Zeltner, B.B., Jaber, J., Post, S.G., Zywiak, W.H., & Stout, R. (2009). Helping others and long-term sobriety: Who should I help to stay? Alcohol Treatment Quarterly, 27, 38–50. doi: 10.1080/07347320802586726
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C.L., & Conger, J.A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C.L., & Sims, H.P. (2001). Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 7, 115–139.
   Google Scholar
• Report to the Parliament. (2011/2012). Se meg!: en helhetlig rusmiddel- politikk: alkohol – narkotika – doping (White Paper 30). Oslo, Norway: Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, F. (1997). Ten self-help principles. Journal of Social Policy, 27, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Safran, J.D., & Muran, J.C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Seers, C.A., Keller, T., & Wilkerson, J.M. (2003). Can team members share leadership? Foundations in research and theory. In Pearce C.L. & J.A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 78–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M.E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toseland, R., & Hacker, L. (1982). Self-help groups and professional involvement. Social Work, 27, 341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trice, H.M., & Beyer, J. (1986). Charisma and its routinization in two social movement organizations. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 113–164). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Trice, H.M., & Roman, P.M. (1970). Sociopsychological predictors of affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous: A longitudinal study of ‘treatment success.’ Social Psychiatry, 5, 51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Vederhus, J.K., Laudet, A., Kristensen, O., & Clausen, T. (2009). Obstacles to 12-step group participation as seen by addiction professionals: Comparing Norway to the United States. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 39, 210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (1982). Studying the implementation of public programs. In W. Williams, R. F. Elmore, R. P. Nathan, & S. A. Macmanus (Eds.), Studying implementation: Methodological and administrative issues. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2011). Applications of case study research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and method. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zemore, S.E., & Pagano, M.E. (2008). Kickbacks from helping others: Health and recovery. Recent Developments in Alcoholism, 18, 141–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Borkman, T. (1997). Emergent order and self-organization: A case study of Alcoholics Anonymous. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 527–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar