2,807
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

New “Crises,” Old Habits: Online Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in UK Migration Policy Discourses

References

  • Adi, A., Erickson, K., & Lilleker, D. (2014). Elite tweets: Analyzing the Twitter communication patterns of labour party peers in the House of Lords. Policy and Internet, 6(1), 1–27.
  • Allen, N. (2011). Labour's third term: A tale of two prime ministers. In A. Nicholas & J. Bartle (Eds.), Britain at the polls 2010, (pp. 1–36). London, UK: Sage.
  • Barros, M. (2014). Tools of legitimacy: The case of the Petrobras corporation blog. Organizational Studies,. 35(8), 1211–1230.
  • Bennett, S. (2015). Constructions of migrant integration in British public discourse ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań, Poznań, Poland.
  • Bernstein, B. (1990). The social construction of pedagogic discourse: Vol. IV. Class, codes and control. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Boukala, S. & Wodak, R. (2015). European identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union—a discourse-historical approach. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(1), 87–109.
  • British newspapers. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 1–28.
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Longman.
  • Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38.
  • Hermida, A. (2013). Reconfiguring journalism research about Twitter, one tweet at a time. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 295–313.
  • Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 34–61). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2010). The discursive construction of European identities. A multi-level approach to discourse and identity in the transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2013). Policy, policy communication and discursive shifts: Analysing EU policy discourses on climate change. In P. Cap & U. Okulska (Eds.), Analysing genres in political communication (pp. 101–133). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Mitchell, A., & Hitlin, P. (2013, March). Twitter reaction to events often at odds with overall public opinion. Retrieved from the Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/04/Twitter-reaction-to-events-often-at-odds-with-overall-public-opinion/
  • Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and DHA: A methodological framework. In C. Hart and P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
  • Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Richardson, J. (2004). (Mis)representing Islam: The racism and rhetoric of British broadsheet newspapers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Richardson, J., & Wodak, R. (2009). Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: Right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the UK. Critical Discourse Studies, 6(4), 251–267.
  • Saggar, S. (2001). The Race Card, again. In P. Norris (Ed.), Britain votes 2001 ( Hansard Society Series in Politics and Government; pp. 195–210). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Schuster, L., & Solomos, J. (1999). The Politics of refugee and asylum policies in Britain: Historical patterns and contemporary realities. In A. Bloch & C. Levy (Eds.), Refugees, citizenship and social policy in Europe (pp. 51–75). Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan.
  • Unger, J., Wodak, R., & KhosraviNik, M. (2016). Critical discourse studies and social media data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (4th edition). London, UK: Sage.
  • Van Eemeren, F., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse and Communication, 1(1), 91–112.
  • Van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001001005
  • Verweij, P. (2012). Twitter links between politicians and journalists. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 680–691.
  • Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). London, UK: Sage.
  • Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What r/wing populist discourses mean. London, UK: Sage.
  • Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19–40.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.