Where Do I Stand?: An Exploration of the Rules That Regulate Victim Participation in the Criminal Justice System

REFERENCES

• Acker , J. 1992 . Social sciences and the criminal law: Victims of crime-plight vs. rights . Criminal Law Review , 28 : 64 – 77 .
   Google Scholar
• Arrigo , B. and Williams , C. 2003 . Victim vices, victim voices, and impact statements: On the place of emotion and the role of restorative justice in capital sentencing . Crime & Delinquency , 49 ( 4 ) : 603 – 626 .
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth , A. 1993 . Victim impact statements and sentencing . Criminal Law Review , : 498 – 509 .
   Google Scholar
• Bandes , S. 1996 . Empathy, narrative, and victim impact statements . University of Chicago Law Review , 63 ( 2 ) : 361 – 412 .
   Google Scholar
• Bandes , S. 1999 . Reply to Paul Cassell: What we know about victim impact statements . Utah Law Review , : 545 – 552 .
   Google Scholar
• Barnes , A. 2002 . Reverse impact testimony: A new and improved victim impact statement . Capital Defense Journal , 14 : 245 – 264 .
   Google Scholar
• Berger , V. 1992 . Symposium: Payne and suffering—A personal reflection and a victim-centered critique . Florida State University Law Review , 20 : 21 – 65 .
   Google Scholar
• Bronet , F. 2001 . Design and how it affects human needs-met, personal participation in daily life, and our sense and practice of justice . Contemporary Justice Review , 4 : 137 – 143 .
   Google Scholar
• Caplan , J. M. 2010 . Parole release decisions: Impact of positive and negative victim and nonvictim input on a representative sample of parole-eligible inmates . Violence and Victims , 25 : 224 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Carlen , P. 1976 . The staging of magistrate justice . British Journal of Criminology , 16 : 48 – 55 .
   Google Scholar
• Cassell , P. 1999 . Barbarians at the gates? A reply to the critics of the victims' rights amendment . Utah Law Review , : 479 – 544 .
   Google Scholar
• Christie , N. 1977 . Conflicts as property . British Journal of Criminology , 17 : 1 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , R. , Kunreuther , F. and Connick , E. 1984 . Expanding the victim's role in the criminal court dispositional process: The results of an experiment . Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology , 75 : 491 – 505 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , R. and Smith , B. 1994 . The effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decisions: A test in an urban setting . Justice Quarterly , 11 : 453 – 512 .
   Google Scholar
• Denzin , N. K. and Lincoln , Y. S. 2005 . “ Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research ” . In The Sage handbook of qualitative research , 3rd , Edited by: Denzin , N. K. and Lincoln , Y. S. 1 – 32 . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Douglas , R. , Laster , K. and Inglis , N. 1994 . Victim of efficiency: Criminal justice reform in Australia . International Review of Victimology , 3 : 95 – 110 .
   Google Scholar
• Edwards , I. 2001 . Victim participation in sentencing: The problems of incoherence . The Howard Journal , 40 : 39 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Edwards , I. 2004 . An ambiguous participant: The crime victim and criminal justice decision-making . British Journal of Criminology , 44 : 967 – 982 .
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg , T. , Garvey , S. and Wells , M. 2003 . Victim characteristics and victim impact evidence in South Carolina capital cases . Cornell Law Review , 88 ( 2 ) : 306 – 342 .
   Google Scholar
• Englebrecht , C. M. 2011 . The struggle for “ownership of conflict”: An exploration of victim participation and voice in the criminal justice system . Criminal Justice Review , 36 : 129 – 151 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , E. 1994 . Victim participation in sentencing: And the debate goes on . International Review of Victimology , 3 : 17 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , E. 1999 . Who's afraid of the big bad victim? Victim impact statements as victim empowerment and enhancement of justice . Criminal Law Review , : 545 – 556 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , E. and Laster , K. 1999 . Neutralizing victim reform: Legal professionals' perspectives on victims and impact statements . Crime & Delinquency , 45 : 530 – 553 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , E. and Roeger , L. 1995 . The effect of victim impact statements on sentencing patterns and outcomes: The Australian experience . Journal of Criminal Justice , 23 : 363 – 375 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , E. , Roeger , L. and Morgan , F. 1997 . Victim harm, impact statements, and victim satisfaction with justice: An Australian experience . International Review of Victimology , 5 ( 1 ) : 37 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , E. and Rogers , L. 1999 . Victim impact statements and sentencing outcomes and processes: The perspectives of legal professionals . British Journal of Criminology , 39 : 216 – 239 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , E. and Tontodonato , P. 1990 . The effect of victim participation in sentencing on sentence outcome . Criminology , 28 : 451 – 474 .
   Google Scholar
• Erez , E. and Tontodonato , P. 1992 . Victim participation in sentencing and satisfaction with justice . Justice Quarterly , 9 : 393 – 417 .
   Google Scholar
• Frazier , P. A. and Haney , B. 1996 . Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives . Law and Human Behavior , 20 : 607 – 628 .
   Google Scholar
• Gerkin , P. M. 2009 . Participation in victim-offender mediation: Lessons learned from observations . Criminal Justice Review , 34 : 226 – 247 .
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz , P. 1996 . “ Victims and voyeurs: Two narrative problems at the criminal trial ” . In Law's Stories , Edited by: Brooks , P. and Gewirtz , P. 135 – 161 . New Haven : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Glaser , B. and Strauss , A. 1967 . The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research , Chicago : Aldine .
   Google Scholar
• Green , D. L. and Pomeroy , E. 2007 . Crime victimization: Assessing differences between violent and nonviolent experiences . Victims and Offenders , 2 : 63 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Greene , E. , Koehring , H. and Quiat , M. 1998 . Victim impact evidence in capital cases: Does the victim's character matter? . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 28 : 145 – 156 .
   Google Scholar
• Henderson , L. 1985 . The wrongs of victims' rights . Stanford Law Review , 37 : 937 – 1021 .
   Google Scholar
• Herman , J. L. 2005 . Justice from the victim's perspective . Violence Against Women , 11 : 571 – 602 .
   Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand , S. W. and Smith , B. E. 1989 . Victims' rights legislation: An assessment of its impact on criminal justice practitioners and victims , Washington , D.C : American Bar Association .
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, S. (2002). Victims for the prosecution, 27, Boston Review www.bostonreview.net/BR27.5/hirsch.htlm (http://www.bostonreview.net/BR27.5/hirsch.htlm)
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman , J. 2003 . Revenge or mercy? Some thoughts about survivor opinion evidence in death penalty cases . Cornell Law Review , 88 : 530 – 542 .
   Google Scholar
• Jordan , J. 2001 . Worlds apart? Women, rape and the police reporting process . British Journal of Criminology , 41 : 679 – 706 .
   Google Scholar
• Karmen , A. 2010 . Crime victims: An introduction to victimology , Belmont , CA : Wadsworth .
   Google Scholar
• Karp , D. and Warshaw , J. 2006 . “ Their day in court: The role of murder victims' families in capital juror decision making ” . In Wounds that do not bind: Victim-based perspectives on the death penalty , Edited by: Acker , J. and Karp , D. 275 – 296 . Durham , NC : Carolina Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Koss , M. 2000 . Blame, shame, and community: Justice responses to violence against women . American Psychologist , 55 : 1332 – 1343 .
   Google Scholar
• Latimer , J. , Dowden , C. and Muise , D. 2005 . The effectiveness of restorative justice: A meta-analysis , The Prison Journal, 85, 127--144 .
   Google Scholar
• Luginbuhl , J. and Burkhead , M. 1995 . Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death . American Journal of Criminal Justice , 20 ( 1 ) : 1 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• Lurigio , A. J. 1987 . Are all victims alike? The adverse, generalized, and differential impact of crime . Crime & Delinquency , 33 : 452 – 467 .
   Google Scholar
• Maley , Y. and Fahey , R. 1991 . Presenting the evidence: Constructions of reality in court . International Journal for the Semiotics of Law , 4 : 3 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• McNamara , M. 2004 . From tavern to courthouse: Architecture and ritual in American law, 1658–1860 , Baltimore , MD : Johns Hopkins University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mileski , M. 1971 . Courtroom encounters: An observation study of a lower criminal court . Law and Society Review , 5 : 473 – 538 .
   Google Scholar
• Morgan , K. and Smith , B. L. 2005 . Victims, punishment, and parole: The effect of victim participation on parole hearings . Criminology and Public Policy , 4 : 333 – 360 .
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty , L. 2005 . Victim participation at parole hearings: Balancing victim, offender, and public interest . Criminology and Public Policy , 4 : 385 – 390 .
   Google Scholar
• Myers , B. and Arbuthnot , J. 1999 . The effects of victim impact evidence on the verdicts and sentencing judgments of mock jurors . Journal of Offender Rehabilitation , 29 : 95 – 112 .
   Google Scholar
• Myers , B. , Lynn , S. and Arbuthnot , J. 2002 . Victim impact testimony and juror judgments: The effects of harm information and witness demeanor . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 32 : 2393 – 2412 .
   Google Scholar
• Nadler , J. and Rose , M. 2003 . Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment . Cornell Law Review , 88 : 419 – 456 .
   Google Scholar
• N.Y. Criminal Procedure Law. § 380.50. (CPL).
   Google Scholar
• New York State Unified Court System. Rules of the Chief Judge. Guidelines for New York State Court Facility. http://www.nycourts.gov/rules/chiefjudge/34.shtml (http://www.nycourts.gov/rules/chiefjudge/34.shtml)
   Google Scholar
• Orth , U. 2002 . Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings . Social Justice Research , 15 : 313 – 325 .
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster , R. and Deise , J. 2011 . A heavy thumb on the scale: The effect of victim impact evidence on capital decision making . Criminology , 49 : 129 – 161 .
   Google Scholar
• People v. Arroyo. 284 AD 2d 735. (2001).
   Google Scholar
• People v. Harrington. 14 AD 3d 944. (2005).
   Google Scholar
• People v. Iovinella. 295 AD 2d 753. (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson-Badali , M. and Broeking , J. 2010 . Parents' involvement in the youth justice system: Rhetoric and reality . Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice , 52 : 1 – 27 .
   Google Scholar
• Phillips , A. K. 1997 . Thou shalt not kill any nice people: The problem of victim impact statements in capital sentencing . American Criminal Law Review , 35 : 93 – 118 .
   Google Scholar
• Presser , L. and Hamilton , C. A. 2006 . The micropolitics of victim-offender mediation . Sociological Inquiry , 76 : 316 – 342 .
   Google Scholar
• Regehr , C. and Alaggia , R. 2006 . Perspectives of justice for victims of sexual assault . Victims and Offenders , 1 : 33 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Regehr , C. , Alaggia , R. , Lambert , L. and Saini , M. 2008 . Victims of sexual violence in the Canadian criminal courts . Victims and Offenders , 3 : 99 – 113 .
   Google Scholar
• Reiff , R. 1979 . The invisible victim: The criminal justice system's forgotten responsibility , New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Sanders , A. , Hoyle , C. , Morgan , R. and Cape , E. 2001 . Victim impact statements: Don't work, can't work . Criminal Law Review , : 447 – 458 .
   Google Scholar
• Sarat , A. 2001 . When the state kills: Capital punishment and the American condition , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sherman , L. , Strang , H. , Angel , C. , Woods , D. , Barnes , G. , Bennett , S. and Inkpen , N. 2005 . Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials . Journal of Experimental Criminology , 1 : 367 – 395 .
   Google Scholar
• Sims , B. , Yost , B. and Abbott , C. 2005 . Use and nonuse of victim services programs: Implications from a statewide survey of crime victims . Criminology & Public Policy , 4 : 361 – 383 .
   Google Scholar
• Snel , B. 1978 . Observation in the courtroom . The Netherlands Journal of Sociology , 14 : 173 – 190 .
   Google Scholar
• Sperry , W. 1992 . Victim impact evidence within a retributive system of justice . Creighton Law Review , 25 : 1275 – 1310 .
   Google Scholar
• Strang , H. 2004 . “ Is restorative justice imposing its agenda on victims? ” . In Critical issues in restorative justice , Edited by: Zehr , H. and Toews , B. 95 – 106 . Monsey , NY : Criminal Justice Press .
   Google Scholar
• Strang , H. , Sherman , L. , Angel , C. , Woods , D. , Bennett , S. , Newbury-Birch , D. and Inkpen , N. 2006 . Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice conferences: A quasi-experimental analysis . Journal of Social Issues , 62 : 281 – 306 .
   Google Scholar
• Sundby , S. E. 2003 . The capital jury and empathy: The problem of worthy and unworthy victims . Cornell Law Review , 88 ( 2 ) : 343 – 381 .
   Google Scholar
• Sundby , S. E. 2005 . A life and death decision: A jury weighs the death penalty , New York : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Tait , D. 2001 . Popular sovereignty and the justice process: Towards a comparative methodology for observing courtroom rituals . Contemporary Justice Review , 4 ( 2 ) : 201 – 218 .
   Google Scholar
• Teuber , A. 2000 . Victims' rights: Justice or revenge? . Imprint , 20 ( 2 ) : 1 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Tobolowsky , P. 1999 . Victim participation in the criminal justice process: Fifteen years after the president's task force on victims of crime . New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement , 25 : 21 – 105 .
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit , M. , Coates , R. and Vos , B. 2001 . The impact of victim-offender mediation: Two decades of research . Federal Probation , 65
   Google Scholar
• Van Ness , D. and Strong , K. H. 2002 . Restoring justice , Cincinnati , OH : Anderson .
   Google Scholar
• Vollum , S. and Longmire , D. R. 2007 . Covictims of capital murder: Statements of victims' family members and friends made at the time of execution . Violence and Victims , 22 : 601 – 619 .
   Google Scholar
• Wall , B. 2001 . Navajo conceptions of justice in the peacemaker court . Journal of Social Philosophy , 32 ( 4 ) : 532 – 546 .
   Google Scholar
• Wemmers , J. 2008 . Victim participation and therapeutic jurisprudence . Victims and Offenders , 3 : 165 – 191 .
   Google Scholar
• Zion , J. 1983 . The Navajo peacemaker court: Deference to the old and accommodation of the new . American Indian Law Review , 21 : 89 – 109 .
   Google Scholar