“Victim Refuses to Cooperate”: A Focal Concerns Analysis of Victim Cooperation in Sexual Assault Cases

REFERENCES

• Avakame, E. F., Fyfe, J. J., & Mccoy, C. (1999). “Did you call the police? What did they do?” An empirical assessment of black’s theory of mobilization of law. Justice Quarterly, 16(4), 765–792. doi:10.1080/07418829900094361
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, R. (1993). Predicting the reporting of rape victimizations: Have rape reforms made a difference? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(3), 254–270. doi:10.1177/0093854893020003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, R. (1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest: New evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(1), 8–29. doi:10.1177/0093854898025001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law & Society Review, 26(2), 343. doi:10.2307/3053901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Block, R. (1974). Why notify the police: The victim’s decision to notify the police of an assault. Criminology, 11(4), 555–569. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1974.tb00614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, A., & Holmstrom, L. (1978). Recovery from rape and prior life stress. Research in Nursing & Health, 1, 165–174. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess-Proctor, A. (2012). Pathways of victimization and resistance: Toward a feminist theory of battered women’s help-seeking. Justice Quarterly, 29(3), 309–346. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.553727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. D., Johnson, B. D., & Slocum, L. A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(2), 151–178. doi:10.1007/s10940-007-9024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. & Raja, S. (1999). Secondary victimization of rape victims: Insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence and Victims, 14, 261–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson, M., & Dinovitzer, R. (2001). Victim cooperation and the prosecution of domestic violence in a specialized court. Justice Quarterly, 18(3), 593–622. doi:10.1080/07418820100095031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichter, M. E., Cerulli, C., Kothari, C. L., Barg, F. K., & Rhodes, K. V. (2011). Engaging with criminal prosecution: The victim’s perspective. Women & Criminal Justice, 21(1), 21–37. doi:10.1080/08974454.2011.536053
   Google Scholar
• Du Mont, J., Miller, K.-L., & Myhr, T. L. (2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9(4), 466–486. doi:10.1177/1077801202250960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez, E., & Belknap, J. (1998). In their own words: Battered women’s assessment of the criminal processing system’s responses. Violence and Victims, 13(3), 251–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felson, R. B., Messner, S. F., Hoskin, A., & Deane, G. (2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology, 40(3), 617–648. doi:10.1111/crim.2002.40.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felson, R. B., & Pare, P.-P. (2008). Gender and the victim’s experience with the criminal justice system. Social Science Research, 37(1), 202–219. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., & Cullen, F. T. (2010). What distinguishes single from recurrent sexual victims? The role of lifestyle-routine activities and first-incident characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 102–129. doi:10.1080/07418820902763061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. (1991). Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships. Law & Society Review, 25(2), 313–334. doi:10.2307/3053801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (Ed.). (1991). Regression diagnostics: An introduction (Vol. 79). Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L., Bennett, L., & Dutton, M. A. (1999). Obstacles to victims’ cooperation with the criminal prosecution of their abusers: The role of social support. Violence and Victims, 14(4), 427–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenberg, M. S., Ruback, R. B., & Westcott, D. R. (1982). Decision making by crime victims: A multimethod approach. Law & Society Review, 17(1), 47. doi:10.2307/3053532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronau, R. (1974). Wage comparisons: A selectivity bias. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1119–1155. doi:10.1086/260267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models with truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. The Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Hindelang, M., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1976). The victim’s decision not to invoke the criminal justice process. In W. F. McDonald (Ed.), Criminal justice and the victim (pp. 57–78). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and revictimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49(2), 313–336. doi:10.1177/0011128702251067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerstetter, W. A., & Van Winkle, B. (1990). Who decides? A study of the complainant’s decision to prosecute in rape cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(3), 268–283. doi:10.1177/0093854890017003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, R. F., & Chayet, E. F. (1984). Why do victims fail to report? The psychology of criminal victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 40(1), 39–50. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. F., & Macintosh, R. C. (2004). Domestic violence: Predictors of victim support for official action. Justice Quarterly, 21(2), 301–328. doi:10.1080/07418820400095821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. F., Macintosh, R. C., Berdahl, T., Blades, C., & Rossi, S. (2001). Domestic violence: The role of interracial/ethnic dyads in criminal court processing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17(2), 123–141. doi:10.1177/1043986201017002004
   Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. F., MacIntosh, R. C., & Sutherland, S. (2002). Criminal charge or probation violation? Prosecutorial discretion and implications for research in criminal court processing. Criminology, 40(3), 553–578. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00966.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court “corrections” to Pennsylvania’s sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40(4), 897–932. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00977.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFree, G. D. (1981). Official reactions to social problems: Police decisions in sexual assault cases. Social Problems, 28(5), 582–594. doi:10.2307/800232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, H. G. (1974). Comments on selectivity biases in wage comparisons. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1145–1155. doi:10.1086/260268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Narra, P., & Weintraub, S. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 71–84. doi:10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizotte, A. (1985). The uniqueness of rape: Reporting assaultive violence to the police. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 169–190. doi:10.1177/0011128785031002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y., & Powell, M. (1994). Accounting for the “second assault”: Legal organizations framing of rape victims. Law and Social Inquiry, 19, 853–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, M. (1983). Victim noncooperation in the prosecution of domestic assault: A research note. Criminology, 21(3), 395–416. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. B. (1958). Lower class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 14(3), 5–19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1958.tb01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neal, E. N., & Spohn, C. (in press). When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault case processing—A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, D. (2011). The impact of detectives’ manner of questioning on rape victims’ disclosure. Violence against Women, 17(11), 1349–1373. doi:10.1177/1077801211434725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino, N., & Meier, R. (1999). Gender differences in rape reporting. Sex Roles, 40, 979–990. doi:10.1023/A:1018837524712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruback, R. (1993). Comment on Bachman (1993): The victim-offender relationship does affect victims’ decisions to report sexual assaults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 271–279. doi:10.1177/0093854893020003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J., & Steury, E. (1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27, 487–510. doi:10.1111/crim.1989.27.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L. A. L., Burcart, J. J., & Wilson, L. A. (1976). The role of attitudes in the decision to report crimes to the police. Portland, OR: Oregon Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G. (1976). Citizen reporting of crime: Some national panel data. Criminology, 13(4), 535–549. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1976.tb00685.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G. (1984). Reporting crimes to the police: The status of world research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21(2), 113–137. doi:10.1177/0022427884021002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the “gateway to justice.” Social Problems, 48(2), 206–235. doi:10.1525/sp.2001.48.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Fornango, R. (2009). U.S. Attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity. Criminology, 47(3), 813–846. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., Rodriguez, N., & Koss, M. P. (2008, November). The “victim declined to prosecute”: Accounting for lack of cooperation in sexual assault cases. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Tellis, K. (2014). Policing & prosecuting sexual assault: Inside the criminal justice system. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., White, C., & Tellis, K. (2014). Unfounding sexual assault: Examining the decision to unfound and identifying false reports. Law & Society Review, 48(1), 161–192. doi:10.1111/lasr.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1998). The interaction of race, gender and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellis, K., & Spohn, C. (2008). The sexual stratification hypothesis revisited: Testing assumptions about simple versus aggravated rape. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(3), 252–261. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence against Women survey. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. D. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137–178. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00516.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T., Kurlychek, M. C., & Kramer, J. H. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(4), 427–458. doi:10.1177/0022427807305853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven, W., & Van Praag, B. (1981). The demand for deductibles in private health insurance. Journal of Econometrics, 17(2), 229–252. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90028-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services. (2011). Sexual Assault Response Teams (SART): A model protocol for Virginia. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. E. (1984). Secondary victimization: Confronting public attitudes about rape. Victimology: An International Journal, 9, 66–81.
   Google Scholar
• Whitcomb, D. (2003). Legal interventions for child victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(2), 149–157. doi:10.1023/A:1022895106297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar