Legal Cynicism, Antisocial Attitudes, and Recidivism: Implications for a Procedurally Just Community Corrections

References

• Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52. doi:10.1177/0093854890017001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Kiessling, J. J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of CaVIC research. In R. R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 441–463). Toronto, ON: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What works and what does not. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Pelfrey, W. V., Bedard, L. E., Dhungana, K., Gertz, M., & Golden, K. (2014). Female inmates’ procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Is there a spill-over of police effects? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 144–162. doi:10.1177/0093854813497479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. E., Eichelsheim, V. I., Van Der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoner’s misconduct: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 196–218. doi:10.1177/0093854814550710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter? Criminal Justice & Behavior, 43, 63–82. doi:10.1177/0093854815609643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review, 48, 34–45. doi:10.2307/2095143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T.-L., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., & Li, J. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1127–1148. doi:10.1177/0093854811420678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T. L., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. K. (2008). Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 248–270. doi:10.1080/10509670802134085
   Google Scholar
• Bourgon, G., & Gutierrez, L. (2012). The general responsivity principle in community supervision: The importance of probation officers using cognitive intervention techniques and its influence on recidivism. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35, 149–166. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2012.674816
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunson, R. K., & Miller, J. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613–640. doi:10.1093/bjc/azi093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, M., & Drake, D. H. (2007). Reconsidering respect: Its role in Her Majesty’s prison service. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 115–127. doi:10.1111/hojo.2007.46.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, N., DeWolf, A., & Serin, R. (2015). Effectively training community supervision officers: A meta-analytic review of the impact on offender outcome. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 42, 977–989. doi:10.1177/0093854815595661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clear, T. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged communities worse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clear, T. R., & Austin, J. (2009). Reducing mass incarceration: Implications of the iron law of prison populations. Harvard Law and Policy Review, 3, 901–918.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the academy of criminal justice sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11, 527–559. doi:10.1080/07418829400092421
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (2003). What correctional treatment can tell us about criminological theory: Implications for social learning theory. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century (Advances in criminological theory: Vol. 11, pp. 339–362). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 203–214. doi:10.1177/0306624X03257765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, E. (2013). Inventory of evidence-based and research-based programs for adult corrections (Document No. 13-12-1901). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, M. R., Cooper, A. D., & Snyder, H. N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, J., & Piquero, A. R. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 715–748. doi:10.1111/jels.2007.4.issue-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18, 217–242. doi:10.1007/s11211-005-6823-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, D., Bierie, D., & MacKenzie, D. (2010). Legitimacy in corrections: A randomized experiment comparing a boot camp with a prison. Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 89–117. doi:10.1111/cpp.2010.9.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M. (2013). Consent searches as a threat to procedural justice and police legitimacy: An analysis of consent requests during traffic stops. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 759–777. doi:10.1177/0887403412464547
   Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M. (2015). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and legal cynicism: A test for mediation effects. Police Practice and Research, 16, 402–415. doi:10.1080/15614263.2014.927766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27, 255–279. doi:10.1080/07418820902763889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Grant, B. A., Leipciger, M., & Collins, S. (1979). Norms and recidivism rates for the MMPI and selected experimental scales on a Canadian delinquent sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 11, 21–31. doi:10.1037/h0081569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adults offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575–607. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Smith, P., & French, S. A. (2006). The theory of effective correctional intervention: Empirical status and future directions. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (Advances in criminological theory: Vol. 15, pp. 419–446). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Glaze, L. E., & Herberman, E. J. (2013). Correctional populations in the United States, 2012. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Gleicher, L., Manchak, S. M., & Cullen, F. T. (2013). Creating a supervision tool kit: How to improve probation and parole. Federal Probation, 77, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Grattet, R., & Lin, J. (2016). Supervision intensity and parole outcome: A competing risks approach to criminal and technical parole violations. Justice Quarterly, 33, 565–583 doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.932001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grattet, R., Lin, J., & Petersilia, J. (2011). Supervision intensity and parole outcomes: a competing risks approach to criminal and technical parole violations. Justice Quarterly, 33, 565–583. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.932001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M. K., Fields, M., & Maxwell, S. R. (2001). Examining probation violations: Who, what, and when. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 537–557. doi:10.1177/0011128701047004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J., & Albonetti, C. (1982). Race, class, and the perception of criminal injustice in America. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 329–355. doi:10.1086/227674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J., Shedd, C., & Payne, M. R. (2005). Race, ethnicity, and youth perceptions of criminal injustice. American Sociological Review, 70, 381–407. doi:10.1177/000312240507000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M. L., Cullen, F. T., Cao, L., Browning, S. L., & Kopache, R. (1997). The impact of race on perceptions of criminal injustice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 447–462. doi:10.1016/S0047-2352(97)00032-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, H., Wells, W., Maguire, E. R., & Gray, J. (2010). Evaluating the measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 384–399. doi:10.1177/0093854809360193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, D. J. (1999). Getting the most out of correctional treatment: Testing the responsivity principle on male and female offenders. Federal Probation, 71, 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Huq, A. Z., Tyler, T. R., & Schulhofer, S. J. (2011). Why does the public cooperate with law enforcement? The influence of the purposes and targets of policing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 419–450. doi:10.1037/a0023367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. A., & Wright, R. (2006). Street justice: Retaliation in the criminal underworld. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennealy, P. J., Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S. M., & Eno-Louden, J. (2012). Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protects against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 496–505. doi:10.1037/h0093935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. S., & Matsuda, M. (2011). Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology, 49, 443–472. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. S., & Papachristos, A. V. (2011). Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1190–1233. doi:10.1086/655754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, K., Garner, B. R., Simpson, D. D., Morey, J. T., & Flynn, P. M. (2006). An assessment for criminal thinking. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 159–177. doi:10.1177/0011128705281749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (1998). The structure of antisocial attitudes among violent and sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 246–257. doi:10.1177/0306624X9804200306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrecque, R. M., Schweitzer, M., & Smith, P. (2014). Exploring the perceptions of the offender-officer relationship in a community supervision setting. Journal of International Criminal Justice Research, 1, 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Labrecque, R. M., & Smith, P. (in press). Does training and coaching matter? An 18-month evaluation of a community supervision model. Victims & Offenders. doi:10.1080/15564886.2015.1013234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrecque, R. M., Smith, P., Schweitzer, M., & Thompson, C. (2013). Targeting antisocial attitudes in community supervision using the EPICS model: An examination of change scores on the criminal sentiment scale. Federal Probation, 77, 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., Smith, P., Schweitzer, M., & Labrecque, R. M. (2013). Evaluation of the effective practices in community supervision model (EPICS) in Ohio. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. M., Steinberg, L., Piquero, A. R., & Knight, G. P. (2011). Identity-linked perceptions of the police among African American juvenile offenders: A developmental perspective. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 23–37. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9553-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A., & Wilson, S. J. (2007). Effects of cognitive behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Nashville, TN: Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lutze, F. E. (2014). Professional lives of community corrections officers: The invisible side of reentry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lutze, F. E., Johnson, W., Clear, T., Latessa, E. J., & Slate, R. (2012). The future of community corrections is now: Stop dreaming and take action. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 28, 42–49. doi:10.1177/1043986211432193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchak, S. M., Kennealy, P. J., & Skeem, J. L. (2014). Officer-offender relationship quality matters: Supervision process as evidence-based practice. Perspectives: The Journal of the American Parole Association, 38, 56–70.
   Google Scholar
• Manchak, S. M., Skeem, J. L., & Rook, K. S. (2014). Care, control, or both? Characterizing major dimensions of the mandated treatment relationship. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 47–57. doi:10.1037/lhb0000039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & Immarigeon, R. (Eds.). (2004). After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., Reisig, M. D., & McCluskey, J. D. (2002). Police disrespect toward the public: An encounter-based analysis. Criminology, 40, 519–551. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00965.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., Snipes, J. B., & Supina, A. E. (1996). The public’s response to specific police requests. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 269–305. doi:10.1177/0022427896033003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51, 33–63. doi:10.1111/crim.2013.51.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meares, T., & Kahan, D. (1998). Law and (norms of) order in the inner city. Law & Society Review, 32, 805–838. doi:10.2307/827740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163–204. doi:10.2307/3054098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., & Odgers, C. (2005). Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 96, 267–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Gomez-Smith, Z., & Langton, L. (2004). Discerning unfairness where others may not: Low self-control and unfair sanction perceptions. Criminology, 42, 699–734. doi:10.1111/crim.2004.42.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., West, V., Fagan, J., & Holland, J. (2006). Neighborhood, race, and the economic consequences of incarceration in New York City, 1985–1996. In R. D. Peterson & L. J. Krivo (Eds.), The many colors of crime: Inequalities of race, ethnicity, and crime in America (pp. 256–273). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. R., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005–1028. doi:10.1177/0093854807301275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. R., & Mesko, G. (2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 41–59. doi:10.1080/10683160802089768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. R., Wolfe, S. E., & Holtfreter, K. (2011). Legal cynicism, legitimacy, and criminal offending: The nonconfounding effect of low self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1265–1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, S. C., Austin, J., & Jones, R. S. (2004). Thinking about prison release and budget crisis in the bluegrass state. Critical Criminology, 12, 243–263. doi:10.1007/s10612-004-3895-6
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. R., Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., VanBenschoten, S., Alexander, M., & Oleson, J. C. (2012). A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (STARR): Using core correctional practices in probation interactions. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35, 167–188. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2012.674823
   Google Scholar
• Rocque, M., Bierie, D. M., Posick, C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2013). Unraveling change: Social bonds and recidivism among released offenders. Victims & Offenders, 8, 209–230. doi:10.1080/15564886.2012.755141
   Google Scholar
• Sachwald, J. (2000). Proactive community supervision: A plan for making Maryland communities safer. Towson, MD: Report to the Budget Committees of the Maryland General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32, 777–804. doi:10.2307/827739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 445–473. doi:10.1177/0022427893030004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, I. W., & Simourd, D. J. (1991). Predicting predatory behavior in a population of incarcerated young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 180–194. doi:10.1177/0093854891018002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, I. W., & Whitehall, G. (1991, December). The pride in delinquency scale. Paper presented at the eastern Ontario correctional psychologists’ winter conference, Burritts Rapids, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Simourd, D. J. (1997). The criminal sentiments scale-modified and pride in delinquency scale: Psychometric properties and construct validity of two measures of criminal attitudes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 52–70. doi:10.1177/0093854897024001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simourd, D. J., & Olver, M. E. (2002). The future of criminal attitudes research and practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 427–446. doi:10.1177/0093854802029004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. L., Eno-Louden, J., Polaschek, D., & Camp, J. (2007). Assessing the relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19, 397–410. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. L., & Manchak, S. (2008). Back to the future: From Klockars’ model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 220–247. doi:10.1080/10509670802134069
   Google Scholar
• Skilling, T. A., & Sorge, G. B. (2014). Measuring antisocial values and attitudes in justice-involved male youth: Evaluating the psychometric properties of the pride in delinquency scale and the criminal sentiments scale-modified. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 992–1007. doi:10.1177/0093854814521415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G., & Frydl, K. (Eds.). (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G., Van Craen, M., & Hennessy, C. (2015). Training police for procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 319–334. doi:10.1007/s11292-014-9223-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Gendreau, P., & Swartz, K. (2009). Validating the principles of effective intervention: A systematic review of the contributions of meta-analysis in the field of corrections. Victims & Offenders, 4, 148–169. doi:10.1080/15564880802612581
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Schweitzer, M., Labrecque, R. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2012). Improving probation officers’ supervision skills: An evaluation of the EPICS model. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35, 189–199. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2012.674826
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, A. L., Kachnowski, V., & Bhati, A. (2005). Does parole work? Analyzing the impact of postprison supervision on rearrest outcomes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, A. L., Osborne, J. W. L., Winterfield, L., Elderbroom, B., Burke, P., Stroker, R. P. … Burrell, W. D. (2008). Putting public safety first: 13 parole supervision strategies to enhance reentry outcomes. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, I. Y., & Wu, Y. (2006). Citizens’ perceptions of the courts: The impact of race, gender, and recent experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 457–467. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for police. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–548. doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatar, J. R., Kaasa, S. O., & Cauffman, E. (2012). Perceptions of procedural justice among female offenders: Time does not heal all wounds. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 268–296. doi:10.1037/a0025118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2002). Supervision: Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation, 66, 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2008). No illusions: Offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision efforts. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 275–302. doi:10.1111/cpp.2008.7.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, C. (2006). Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, C. (2013). Reducing recidivism through probation supervision: What we know and don’t know from four decades of research. Federal Probation, 77, 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 283–358). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322–342. doi:10.1177/1098611104271105
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Darley, J. M. (2000). Building a law-abiding society: Taking public views about morality and the legitimacy of legal authorities into account when formulating substantive law. Hofstra Law Review, 28, 707–739.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, S., Oudekerk, B. A., Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. (2015). Examining the link between perceptions of relationship quality with parole officers and recidivism among female youth parolees. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13, 60–76. doi:10.1177/1541204013507959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C., LaVigne, N., & Travis, J. (2004). Returning home: Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D. (1995). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles: Part I—Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 307–325. doi:10.1177/0093854895022003008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werth, R. (2012). I do what I’m told, sort of: Reformed subjects, unruly citizens, and parole. Theoretical Criminology, 16, 329–346. doi:10.1177/1362480611410775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollard, J. L., Harvell, S., & Graham, S. (2008). Anticipatory injustice among adolescents: Age and racial/ethnic differences in perceived unfairness of the justice system. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26, 207–226. doi:10.1002/bsl.805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. A., & Cesar, G. T. (2013). Toward a more complete model of offender reintegration: Linking the individual-, community-, and system-level components of recidivism. Victims & Offenders, 8, 373–398. doi:10.1080/15564886.2013.803004
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. A., Kim, B., Chassin, L., Losoya, S. H., & Piquero, A. R. (2014). Ecological context, concentrated disadvantage, and youth reoffending: Identifying the social mechanisms in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1781–1799. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0173-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. A., & Rosky, J. W. (2011). Too early is too soon: Lessons from the Montana Department of Corrections early release program. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 881–908. doi:10.1111/capp.2011.10.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. E. (1976). The criminal personality: Volume 1. A profile for change. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar