The Best Way Out is Always Through: Addressing the Problem of Untested Sexual Assault Kits (SAKs) through Multidisciplinary Collaboration

References

• Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2019). The Sexual Assault Initiative (SAKI) program. Retrieved from https://www.bja.gov/ProgramDetails.aspx?Program_ID=117
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. M. (2005). Forensic DNA typing: Biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. M. (2014). Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: Interpretation. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., Feeney, H., Fehler-Cabral, G., Shaw, J., & Horsford, S. (2017). The national problem of untested sexual assault kits (SAKs): Scope, causes, and future directions for research, policy, and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18, 363–376. doi:10.1177/1524838015622436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., Fehler-Cabral, G., Pierce, S. J., Sharma, D., Bybee, D., Shaw, J., … Feeney, H. (2015). The Detroit sexual assault kit (SAK) action research project (ARP), final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., Pierce, S. J., Sharma, D. B., Feeney, H., Goodman-Williams, R., & Ma, W. (2018). Serial sexual assaults: A longitudinal examination of offending patterns using DNA evidence. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., Shaw, J., & Fehler-Cabral, G. (2015). Shelving justice: The discovery of thousands of untested rape kits in Detroit. City & Community, 14, 151–166. doi:10.1111/cico.12108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. (2011). Victim confidentiality on sexual assault response teams (SART). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 360–376. doi:10.1177/0886260510362895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. (2018). Structural, organizational, and interpersonal factors influencing interprofessional collaboration on sexual assault response teams. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 2682–2703. doi:10.1177/0886260516628809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J., & Logan, T. K. (2008). Negotiating the challenges of multidisciplinary responses to sexual assault victims: Sexual assault nurse examiner and victim advocacy programs. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 76–85. doi:10.1002/nur.20234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R.C., Auchter, B., Wells, W., Camp, T., & Howley, S. (in press). The effects of legislation mandating DNA testing in sexual assault cases: Results in Texas. Violence Against Women (preprint online).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R. C., & Wells, W. (2019). DNA testing in sexual assault cases: When do the benefits outweigh the costs? Forensic Science International, 299, 44–48. (in press). doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, D., Galloway, I., & Cytron, N. (2012). Routinizing the extraordinary. In N. O. Andrews & D. J. Erickson (Eds.), Investing in what works for America’s communities (pp. 377–406). San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Greeson, M., Neal, J. W., & Campbell, R. (2019). Using social network analysis to identify successful relationship patterns within Sexual Assault Response Teams (SARTs). Violence Against Women, 25, 968–998. doi:10.1177/1077801218801115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeson, M. G., Soibatian, C., & Houston-Kolnik, J. D. (2018). The influence of community sociocultural context on creating an effective coordinated response to sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42, 445–460. doi:10.1177/0361684318790233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeson, M. R., & Campbell, R. (2013). Sexual assault response teams (SARTs): An empirical review of their effectiveness and challenges to successful implementation. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 83–95. doi:10.1177/1524838012470035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeson, M. R., & Campbell, R. (2015). Coordinated community efforts to respond to sexual assault: A national study of Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) implementation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2470–2487. doi:10.1177/0886260514553119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeson, M. R., Campbell, R., Bybee, D., & Kennedy, A. (2016). Improving the community response to sexual assault: An empirical examination of the effectiveness of sexual assault response teams (SARTs). Psychology of Violence, 6, 280–291. doi:10.1037/a0039617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2012). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2012, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2009). Testing justice: The rape kit backlog in Los Angeles City and County. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2010). “I used to think the law would protect me” Illinois’s failure to test rape kits. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Klofas, J., Hipple, N. K., & McGarrell, E. (Eds.). (2010). The new criminal justice: American communities and the changing world of crime control. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, J. A., & Neal, Z. P. (2016). Networked community change: Understanding community systems change through the lens of social network analysis. American Journal Of Community Psychology, 57, 426–436. doi:10.1002/ajcp.12052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, R., Luminais, M., Flannery, D. J., Bell, R., & Kyker, B. (2018). Describing the process and quantifying the outcomes of the Cuyahoga County sexual assault kit initiative. Journal of Criminal Justice, 57, 106–115. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2005). Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mattessich, P. W., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. R. (2001). Collaboration: What makes it work. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C. (2001). The applegate partnership: Innovation in crisis. In D. Kemmis (Ed.), Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation and the American west (pp. 102–111). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moylan, C. A., & Lindhorst, T. (2015a). “Catching flies with honey” The management of conflict in sexual assault response teams. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1945–1964. doi:10.1177/0886260514549464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moylan, C. A., & Lindhorst, T. (2015b). Institutionalizing an ethic of coordinated care for rape victims: Exploring processes of legitimacy and decoupling in sexual assault response teams. Social Services Review, 89, 138–165. doi:10.1086/679977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moylan, C. A., Lindhorst, T., & Tajima, E. A. (2015). Sexual Assault Response Teams (SARTs) mapping a research agenda that incorporates an organizational perspective. Violence Against Women, 21, 516–534. doi:10.1177/1077801215569607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moylan, C. A., Lindhorst, T., & Tajima, E. A. (2017). Contested discourses in multidisciplinary sexual assault response teams (SARTs). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3–22. doi:10.1177/0886260515585530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent-Borakove, M. E., Fanfilk, P., Troutman, D., Johnson, N., Burgess, A., & O’Connor, A. L. (2006). Testing the efficacy of SANE/SART programs: So they make a difference in sexual assault arrest and prosecution outcomes? Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., Johnson, D., Herz, D., Graziano, L., & Oehler, T. (2012). Sexual assault kit backlog study. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Pinchevsky, G. M. (2018). Criminal justice considerations for unsubmitted and untested sexual assault kits: A review of the literature and suggestions for moving forward. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29, 925–945. doi:10.1177/0887403416662899
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal Of Public Administration Research And Theory, 18, 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, S. (2015, July 16). Tens of thousands of rape kits go untested across USA. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/07/16/untested-rape-kits-evidence-across-usa/29902199/
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, N. (2011). The road ahead: Unanalyzed evidence in sexual assault cases. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, N. (2016). Down the road: Testing evidence in sexual assaults. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, R. M. (2002). The skilled facilitator: Practical wisdom for developing effective groups (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Speaker, P. J. (2019). The jurisdictional return on investment from processing the backlog of untested sexual assault kits. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 1, 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Tellis, K. (2010). Justice denied? The exceptional clearance of rape cases in Los Angeles. Albany Law Review, 74, 1379–1421.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K. J., & Hickman, M. J. (2010). Unanalyzed evidence in law-enforcement agencies: A national examination of forensic processing in police departments. Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 381–404. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00635.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, K. J., & Hickman, M. J. (2016). Untested sexual assault kits: Searching for an empirical foundation to guide forensic case processing decisions. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(15), 593. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12213
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Wein, L. M. (2018). Analyzing approaches to the backlog of untested sexual assault kits in the USA. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 63, 1110–1121. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne County sexual Assault Kit Task Force. (2019, April). Frequently asked questions (FAQ). Detroit, MI: Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office.
   Google Scholar